Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Most gritty west coast area
SF/OAK metro 29 38.67%
LA/LBC metro 36 48.00%
SEA/TAC metro 8 10.67%
Other 2 2.67%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-01-2020, 06:22 PM
 
8,276 posts, read 11,917,264 times
Reputation: 10080

Advertisements

The neighborhoods in the above links look perfectly fine, unless this is a case where appearances are deceiving..

If you want ugly, gritty squalor, try Philly or Baltimore....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-01-2020, 11:56 PM
 
2,088 posts, read 1,973,589 times
Reputation: 3169
I think the street views posted so far show the West Coast just really isn't that gritty. There are some areas in each of these towns, but on the whole, they aren't too bad. When I think gritty, I think burned out and abandoned buildings, and with the housing shortage on the West Coast, there aren't too many of those. Also, the lower density, yards, and sunshine all make the areas look nicer, even in areas of the West Coast with higher crime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2020, 01:38 AM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,741 posts, read 6,730,607 times
Reputation: 7588
Walnut Creek - East Bay. Maybe it's considered "rough" if you're looking for a parking spot.

https://www.google.com/maps/@37.9004...7i16384!8i8192
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2020, 03:40 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,631 posts, read 12,773,959 times
Reputation: 11221
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texamichiforniasota View Post
I think the street views posted so far show the West Coast just really isn't that gritty. There are some areas in each of these towns, but on the whole, they aren't too bad. When I think gritty, I think burned out and abandoned buildings, and with the housing shortage on the West Coast, there aren't too many of those. Also, the lower density, yards, and sunshine all make the areas look nicer, even in areas of the West Coast with higher crime.
You can be gritty without being abandoned or burnt out. It’s the yards sunshine, and general newness and lack of density.

I think the thread compares west coast regions specifically because the west coast isn’t al that gritty.

But some parts of the west with their lack of foliage, tight lots, iron fences, cracked pavement, long dry strips, gravel pit yards and graffiti can be pretty gritty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2020, 10:50 AM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,348,308 times
Reputation: 6225
DTLA is the definition of good gritty. It isn't like North Philly or West Baltimore, but it's a good level of not being too bougie yet still having some street life to it. Gritty does not mean totally rundown and dangerous and disgusting. I can't explain it in words, and if you don't know what it is, please don't vote. I.e. The late 2000s and early 2010s in the Bay were still gritty. Places like SoMa, Polk St, southern parts of the Mission, Civic Center were gritty back then. Now you have Twitter in a formerly no-go zone of SF and SoMa is a luxury apartment zone. Oakland was still gritty back then too. However, the spillover of money from SF has changed Oakland as well. The Bay Area has become far too gentrified to hold onto anything gritty besides a few pockets.

In LA, you still have places like DTLA, MacArthur Park, Koreatown, Hollywood, East Hollywood, Echo Park, Lincoln Heights, maybe Boyle Heights, and the entire area of LBC between Downtown LBC and Belmont Shore. There are probably some others I'm forgetting too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2020, 11:46 AM
 
2,304 posts, read 1,713,066 times
Reputation: 2282
Overall, I'd say LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2020, 04:01 PM
 
2,770 posts, read 2,604,192 times
Reputation: 3048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent_Adultman View Post
Overall, I'd say LA.
This^

When I lived in the Bay Area, it's grittiness seemed to be focused to several dense nodes, over small land areas. I'm not proud to say this, but I've been homeless several times in my life, and when I was in San Fran/Oakland, it was just easier to live, because everything was so close together.

LA/Long Beach on the other hand was extremely overwhelming, because it's grittiness was so vast, by a long shot. It was very hard to survive there and made it feel extremely gritty compared to the Bay Area.

I won't comment on Seattle, since I've never lived there.

Also, I find it funny that grittiness is being treated as an admirable trait(for a city) so far in this thread. Go live on the streets for a couple years and you'll most likely be pining for the burbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2020, 05:05 PM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,348,308 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdaelectro View Post
This^

When I lived in the Bay Area, it's grittiness seemed to be focused to several dense nodes, over small land areas. I'm not proud to say this, but I've been homeless several times in my life, and when I was in San Fran/Oakland, it was just easier to live, because everything was so close together.

LA/Long Beach on the other hand was extremely overwhelming, because it's grittiness was so vast, by a long shot. It was very hard to survive there and made it feel extremely gritty compared to the Bay Area.

I won't comment on Seattle, since I've never lived there.

Also, I find it funny that grittiness is being treated as an admirable trait(for a city) so far in this thread. Go live on the streets for a couple years and you'll most likely be pining for the burbs.
There is a difference, I think to most, between grittiness and downright slums. I.e. I prefer DTLA over West LA because it has some dirt to it. It feels more authentic. It doesn't feel as fake. It's not full of suburban white kids who think they're cool now because they moved to LA. It's not full of bougie people obsessed with luxury brand names. However, it's not Watts either.

Similarly, SF back in the day was different. SoMa in parts was downright bad. Some parts were gritty. Civic Center and the TL were horrible places to be. But now they're nice(?). Now everything is an Apple Store and a coffee shop with $8 pour overs. There is an in between vibe. I'm not sure what it is today in SF. But in LA, it's places like DTLA, parts of LBC east of Downtown LBC, Koreatown, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2020, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,631 posts, read 12,773,959 times
Reputation: 11221
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessemh431 View Post
There is a difference, I think to most, between grittiness and downright slums. I.e. I prefer DTLA over West LA because it has some dirt to it. It feels more authentic. It doesn't feel as fake. It's not full of suburban white kids who think they're cool now because they moved to LA. It's not full of bougie people obsessed with luxury brand names. However, it's not Watts either.

Similarly, SF back in the day was different. SoMa in parts was downright bad. Some parts were gritty. Civic Center and the TL were horrible places to be. But now they're nice(?). Now everything is an Apple Store and a coffee shop with $8 pour overs. There is an in between vibe. I'm not sure what it is today in SF. But in LA, it's places like DTLA, parts of LBC east of Downtown LBC, Koreatown, etc.
Judging off street view..Watts just looks gritty to me. Not a place I’d want to live but it doesn’t look worse than gritty really.

https://goo.gl/maps/aQVtkPYeTuSKqpPL7

https://goo.gl/maps/WLCq5E8iwFG34dAb6

https://goo.gl/maps/g2GUeordcVG9EBrZA

https://goo.gl/maps/noDH4gQHYKGfDKqk9

https://goo.gl/maps/vTpXHB7YgZwrf8X18

https://goo.gl/maps/ndbn7VVgyQEssozG6

https://goo.gl/maps/qaoKVthQFyHThbdNA

https://goo.gl/maps/NPYcJQCUnzu42orw9
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2020, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,631 posts, read 12,773,959 times
Reputation: 11221
Vegas Might could win this

https://goo.gl/maps/scP8KbcXtALApyrH7

https://goo.gl/maps/bnW8kXc1i3g4i1Mu5

https://goo.gl/maps/3gjZUt3goAk7TzfV7

https://goo.gl/maps/h5QSywp5AgYhjEEF6

https://goo.gl/maps/mQerCZ5uKZaBLCWG6

https://goo.gl/maps/stZbjKCzzCiFsL9p7

https://goo.gl/maps/9idhJynAq5E1Yx9d6

https://goo.gl/maps/Wy4sS3ZmuBLHTvwz6

https://goo.gl/maps/WWcZ44KNCB5sPLob6

https://goo.gl/maps/1oyx7Lt5mjTjcH9r5

But it’s probably too much new and subdivision heavy. Much of it is immaculate and brand spanking new. It’s definitely has uglier ugly parts than LA or the Bay..let alone Seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top