Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Most gritty west coast area
SF/OAK metro 29 38.67%
LA/LBC metro 36 48.00%
SEA/TAC metro 8 10.67%
Other 2 2.67%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-06-2020, 11:13 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,629 posts, read 12,754,191 times
Reputation: 11221

Advertisements

None of the SEA/TAC street views are holding a candle to LA or Vegas imo. They don't really look gritty. Just Like normal older urban squares or run down single family homes. Lots of physical space, amenities, and transit or just generic commericial stripsthat whle not sexy arent at all gritty.

The last image V-A posted..this s directly on the side street: https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6987...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.7005...7i16384!8i8192

this is half a block up from the fist image: https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2537...7i16384!8i8192

I just dont see it..not compared to North/West Vegas or South/East LA County
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-06-2020, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Oakland
765 posts, read 898,545 times
Reputation: 765
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
None of the SEA/TAC street views are holding a candle to LA or Vegas imo. They don't really look gritty. Just Like normal older urban squares or run down single family homes. Lots of physical space, amenities, and transit or just generic commericial stripsthat whle not sexy arent at all gritty.

The last image V-A posted..this s directly on the side street: https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6987...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.7005...7i16384!8i8192

this is half a block up from the fist image: https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2537...7i16384!8i8192

I just dont see it..not compared to North/West Vegas or South/East LA County
Tacoma's nickname is literally grit city. I see your point, and Tacoma has come a long way in rehabbing itself. There are still some serious elements of grit though imo.

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2546...4!8i8192?hl=en

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2318...4!8i8192?hl=en

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2346...4!8i8192?hl=en

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2642...4!8i8192?hl=en
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2020, 03:28 PM
 
2,304 posts, read 1,711,779 times
Reputation: 2282
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
None of the SEA/TAC street views are holding a candle to LA or Vegas imo. They don't really look gritty. Just Like normal older urban squares or run down single family homes. Lots of physical space, amenities, and transit or just generic commericial stripsthat whle not sexy arent at all gritty.

The last image V-A posted..this s directly on the side street: https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6987...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.7005...7i16384!8i8192

this is half a block up from the fist image: https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2537...7i16384!8i8192

I just dont see it..not compared to North/West Vegas or South/East LA County
Aurora Avenue in Seattle between 85th and 105th is gritty by any standard, even if the neighborhoods that border it aren't necessarily. The businesses are largely run down, there are a bunch of flophouses, infrastructure is dilapidated, and the majority of people you see walking around (aside from those waiting for transit) are prostitutes, pimps, and drug dealers/addicts. It's hard to see on streetview because the street is so wide.

This is a national news story about prostitution that focuses on Aurora:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGpWZtBnDrU

Here's another video showing the gritty landscape of Aurora:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A74_TQKLO-s

Just to clarify, I voted for LA, and I think the Bay Area (really just the inner East Bay) would be second. But the Seattle metro has plenty of gritty sections, especially by Western metro standards.

I don't think Vegas is up there in terms of grittiness. It has some serious ghettos and crime issues but it just doesn't look that gritty. Most of those streetviews you posted just look desolate above all else, or in some cases they actually look nice. How is this (one of the views you posted) gritty? https://www.google.com/maps/@36.1750...7i13312!8i6656

Last edited by Vincent_Adultman; 04-06-2020 at 03:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2020, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Redondo Beach
373 posts, read 252,758 times
Reputation: 182
Part of SF metro are more gritty than anything in western U.S but on average as a whole metro is more debatable
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2020, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,629 posts, read 12,754,191 times
Reputation: 11221
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent_Adultman View Post
Aurora Avenue in Seattle between 85th and 105th is gritty by any standard, even if the neighborhoods that border it aren't necessarily. The businesses are largely run down, there are a bunch of flophouses, infrastructure is dilapidated, and the majority of people you see walking around (aside from those waiting for transit) are prostitutes, pimps, and drug dealers/addicts. It's hard to see on streetview because the street is so wide.

This is a national news story about prostitution that focuses on Aurora:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGpWZtBnDrU

Here's another video showing the gritty landscape of Aurora:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A74_TQKLO-s

Just to clarify, I voted for LA, and I think the Bay Area (really just the inner East Bay) would be second. But the Seattle metro has plenty of gritty sections, especially by Western metro standards.

I don't think Vegas is up there in terms of grittiness. It has some serious ghettos and crime issues but it just doesn't look that gritty. Most of those streetviews you posted just look desolate above all else, or in some cases they actually look nice. How is this (one of the views you posted) gritty? https://www.google.com/maps/@36.1750...7i13312!8i6656
40 feet up a dude has a huge shopping cart full of trash and belongings. Another dude just pouring gasoline into a gas container (is it gasoline?)

No trees

No walkability/landscaping

Matters/dresses on the sidewalk

Brown, dry, drab apartment blocks that look super cheap

No visible shops or stores

Some busted looking vehicles


To me, the of the ghettos of Vegas looks desolate, underdeveloped, dusty, old, junky, ranch-like, vast, dull, hot and hellish. Landscape looks bare and unforgiving especially when I th ink of that heat, the lack of foliage harshness the appearance. I see junk in everyone yards, and sand in the road, with very little color to liven things up. Tons of vacant lots. Bars on the windows. No nice central village streets like in SEA/TAC.

Not that I don’t see a little bit of grit in SEA/TAC but I do think it looks more lush, developed, clean and orderly than Vegas.

Last edited by BostonBornMassMade; 04-06-2020 at 05:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2020, 06:24 PM
 
2,304 posts, read 1,711,779 times
Reputation: 2282
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
40 feet up a dude has a huge shopping cart full of trash and belongings. Another dude just pouring gasoline into a gas container (is it gasoline?)

No trees

No walkability/landscaping

Matters/dresses on the sidewalk

Brown, dry, drab apartment blocks that look super cheap

No visible shops or stores

Some busted looking vehicles


To me, the of the ghettos of Vegas looks desolate, underdeveloped, dusty, old, junky, ranch-like, vast, dull, hot and hellish. Landscape looks bare and unforgiving especially when I th ink of that heat, the lack of foliage harshness the appearance. I see junk in everyone yards, and sand in the road, with very little color to liven things up. Tons of vacant lots. Bars on the windows. No nice central village streets like in SEA/TAC.

Not that I don’t see a little bit of grit in SEA/TAC but I do think it looks more lush, developed, clean and orderly than Vegas.
Oh I agree that they look desolate, underdeveloped, hot, nightmarish, but that doesn't translate to gritty necessarily to me. I lived in Tucson for 5 years and it reminds me quite a bit of some of the areas there. Empty, desolate, dystopian even, yes - but not my idea of what is meant by gritty. It's a Mad Max vibe in that anything goes but the built environment is pretty nondescript and there are very few people around.

To me the definition of West Coast grittiness is the Tenderloin in SF or some of the denser corridors in East LA - plenty of commerce, restaurants, transit, etc. but generally run down with a lot of sketchy activity. Not a classically dangerous ghetto a la Southside Chicago but very gritty.

The gritty areas in the Seattle metro are more in that vein - they have that more more rundown look and sketchy vibe. Not desolate, underdeveloped, or dull necessarily. The heavy foilage makes it harder to translate via streetview, hence why I included some videos. Tacoma and Everett are still largely blue collar cities and have plenty of gritty areas in that respect.

For example, in my mind a block like this in Seattle is significantly grittier than those areas in Vegas (not more dangerous, but grittier):

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6006...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6007...7i16384!8i8192

Last edited by Vincent_Adultman; 04-06-2020 at 06:33 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2020, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,629 posts, read 12,754,191 times
Reputation: 11221
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent_Adultman View Post
Oh I agree that they look desolate, underdeveloped, hot, nightmarish, but that doesn't translate to gritty necessarily to me. I lived in Tucson for 5 years and it reminds me quite a bit of some of the areas there. Empty, desolate, dystopian even, yes - but not my idea of what is meant by gritty. It's a Mad Max vibe in that anything goes but the built environment is pretty nondescript and there are very few people around.

To me the definition of West Coast grittiness is the Tenderloin in SF or some of the denser corridors in East LA - plenty of commerce, restaurants, transit, etc. but generally run down with a lot of sketchy activity. Not a classically dangerous ghetto a la Southside Chicago but very gritty.

The gritty areas in the Seattle metro are more in that vein - they have that more more rundown look and sketchy vibe. Not desolate, underdeveloped, or dull necessarily. The heavy foilage makes it harder to translate via streetview, hence why I included some videos. Tacoma and Everett are still largely blue collar cities and have plenty of gritty areas in that respect.

For example, in my mind a block like this in Seattle is significantly grittier than those areas in Vegas (not more dangerous, but grittier):

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6006...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6007...7i16384!8i8192
To me the areas in Seattle would just be considered normal or even moderately upscale/gentrifying back East. Vegas looks distinctly western, alien and hellish. Most of the Seattle pics just looks like a less gritty what I’m used to. But these two pictures were legitimately gritty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2020, 11:00 PM
Status: "See My Blog Entries for my Top 500 Most Important USA Cities" (set 8 days ago)
 
Location: Harrisburg, PA
1,051 posts, read 977,648 times
Reputation: 1406
LA because it is more industrial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2020, 11:21 PM
 
2,304 posts, read 1,711,779 times
Reputation: 2282
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
To me the areas in Seattle would just be considered normal or even moderately upscale/gentrifying back East. Vegas looks distinctly western, alien and hellish. Most of the Seattle pics just looks like a less gritty what I’m used to. But these two pictures were legitimately gritty.
I get what you're saying but in reality Aurora, Rainier Beach, and several other parts of the Seattle region are actually grittier than those two pictures from Pioneer Square.

This is just a random sampling of streetviews from around the Seattle region that I would consider gritty. I think these can hold up to most of the Vegas ones in terms of grittiness. Not as dystopian, alien, desolate, and hellish as you said, but more in line with the traditional definition of gritty.

1) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.5646...7i16384!8i8192

2) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.7045...7i16384!8i8192

3) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2346...4!8i8192?hl=en

4) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.5637...7i16384!8i8192

5) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.5326...7i16384!8i8192

6) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2549...7i16384!8i8192

7) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.4788...7i16384!8i8192

8) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.5737...7i16384!8i8192

9) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.7242...7i16384!8i8192

10) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.1990...7i16384!8i8192

11) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.5558...7i16384!8i8192

12) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.5534...7i13312!8i6656

13) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2546...4!8i8192?hl=en

14)https://www.google.com/maps/@47.2318...4!8i8192?hl=en

15) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.9933...7i16384!8i8192

16) https://www.google.com/maps/@47.5447...7i16384!8i8192

Last edited by Vincent_Adultman; 04-07-2020 at 12:20 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2020, 01:46 AM
 
Location: The Heart of Dixie
10,214 posts, read 15,920,736 times
Reputation: 7197
The Los Angeles area has a lot of gritty parts, like most of South Central, Watts, Compton, and East L.A. like Montebello. A lot of San Bernardino and the Inland Empire have a gritty feel too, at least by West Coast standards. I'd say areas like Mojave and Victorville might count as gritty too. San Francisco has a more yuppie/hipster/techie reputation than gritty. Oakland is one exception, though I wouldn't say its grittier than South Central or East LA.

But there's nothing on the West Coast that's gritty on the level of Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newark or even parts of New Orleans.

During my visit to Seattle I saw more poverty and downtrodden areas than I had expected to, but I wouldn't say Seattle is a gritty city overall, it's probably one of the most plastic cities in the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top