Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-08-2020, 03:40 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
3,416 posts, read 2,472,470 times
Reputation: 6166

Advertisements

Salt Lake City
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2020, 05:34 AM
 
7,075 posts, read 16,778,681 times
Reputation: 3575
No idea how people aren't seeing the rise of Louisville
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,510 posts, read 26,378,264 times
Reputation: 13304
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjoseph View Post
I am shocked by NOLA; who knew how tall that skyline was. Unfortunately, I don't see Buffalo or Rochester adding anything closely resembling a skyscraper in the near and distant future. Way too stagnant.
It's not really tall, it's really really dense though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,510 posts, read 26,378,264 times
Reputation: 13304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter1948 View Post
No idea how people aren't seeing the rise of Louisville
Shocking, isn't it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,704 posts, read 9,452,501 times
Reputation: 7278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter1948 View Post
No idea how people aren't seeing the rise of Louisville
Louisville continues to make progress. The city appears to be falling in line with older cities with a focus on infill rather than skyscrapers. The list of projects are impressive.

https://www.bizjournals.com/louisvil...re/crane-watch
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 02:52 PM
 
1,798 posts, read 1,130,311 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
I am not seeing it.
How familiar are you with Richmond and when's the last time you visited?

There is a lot of momentum for the region and the city & state are making all the right moves to support a future boom.

Also, as a city, I find that Richmond has a lot more character than many of the "trendy" places like Austin, Nashville, Denver, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 03:41 PM
 
37,904 posts, read 42,090,243 times
Reputation: 27325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter1948 View Post
Skyline wise, I rank Louisville a good half notch above Richmond. It's just a better and bigger waterfront back drop.
Their skylines are definitely in the same tier. Louisville's tallest having a decorative top helps, but otherwise its skyline is a bit more dated. Richmond's skyline is the definition of boxy, but it does have a few newer glassy additions that give it a fresh element.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 04:12 PM
 
7,075 posts, read 16,778,681 times
Reputation: 3575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
Their skylines are definitely in the same tier. Louisville's tallest having a decorative top helps, but otherwise its skyline is a bit more dated. Richmond's skyline is the definition of boxy, but it does have a few newer glassy additions that give it a fresh element.
Cannot disagree here....Louisville's skyline looks and feels bigger. Louisville's traditional water front view doesn't show the incredible North/South density of midrises in between.

I think the stats show that too. But it's splitting hairs. Louisville has at least 3 more skyscrapers...that's a big difference in any city with under 20 scrapers!

Louisville and Richmond are virtually twins, the good and bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 04:48 PM
 
37,904 posts, read 42,090,243 times
Reputation: 27325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter1948 View Post
Cannot disagree here....Louisville's skyline looks and feels bigger. Louisville's traditional water front view doesn't show the incredible North/South density of midrises in between.

I think the stats show that too. But it's splitting hairs. Louisville has at least 3 more skyscrapers...that's a big difference in any city with under 20 scrapers!

Louisville and Richmond are virtually twins, the good and bad.
It's been a while since I've been to Louisville so I can't make an up-to-date comparison between the two, but while Richmond has 10 buildings at 300 ft+ and Louisville has 14 buildings at the same height, Richmond's next five tallest buildings or so aren't very far behind. Louisville's edge isn't so much in the number of skyscrapers, but rather height.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2020, 11:19 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
811 posts, read 694,293 times
Reputation: 1232
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post
Observations:

*New Orleans blows away this segment of cities, with a huge amount higher than any of them

*Many in this segment have none over 300 feet under construction, but do have 150-300 ft construction

*Louisville has a nice number of skyscrapers downtown. It has the same number of skyscrapers as both Kansas City and St Louis--much bigger metros

*I predict Raleigh will advance quickly in this segment, over the next decade
New Orleans was a major city prior to the advent of the automobile. There were over 100k residents in 1840!!!

Raleigh has had two major skyscraper roadblocks for a long time; Research Triangle Park, and the City Council. RTP is a massive employment hub, and due to its presence it has historically attracted a lot of commercial development to it instead of downtown Raleigh. However, with the increased focus on urbanization, companies are starting to take more of an interest in downtown. On the governmental side, the City Council has historically not been very helpful at all with restrictive zoning, absurdly long approval processes (by the time anything gets approved, the economy tanks), and too much NIMBY influence. However, the last elections saw several anti-growth council members replaced with new, pro-growth ones who generally seem to be easier to work with, so I am hoping that we will finally start to see some height.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top