Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-08-2020, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
10,072 posts, read 14,449,392 times
Reputation: 11257

Advertisements

I thought I'd segment this tier of metro areas out for the largest in the US, over 3 million in population.

Thought it would be fascinating to see a good snapshot of how these sizes of metros stack up with total number of skyscrapers completed, in 2020.

Numbers are for completed skyscrapers and then in parentheses, a rough under construction count. I used wikipedia as a source, and I realize it may be off by a few for each city.

For skyscrapers, I'm including 300 feet or higher only, as a baseline.

Metro area populations are for 2018 estimates.

Sorted by highest number of completed skyscrapers to least number of completed:


1. New York City: 19.979 million
Skyscrapers: 375+
(under construction 10+)

2. Chicago: 9.498 million
Skyscrapers: 175+
(under construction 13)

3. Miami-Ft Lauderdale: 6.198 million
Skyscrapers: 110+
(under construction 6)

4. San Francisco-Oakland: 4.729 million
Skyscrapers: 80+
(under construction 7+)

5. Houston: 6.997 million
Skyscrapers: 65+
(under construction 3)

6. Seattle: 3.939 million
Skyscrapers: 60+
(under construction 15+)

7. Los Angeles: 13.291 million
Skyscrapers: 60+
(under construction 12)

8. Dallas-Ft Worth: 7.539 million
Skyscrapers: 55+
(under construction 4)

9. Atlanta: 5.949 million
Skyscrapers: 50+
(under construction 2)

10. Boston: 4.875 million
Skyscrapers: 45+
(under construction 7)

11. Philadelphia: 6.096 million
Skyscrapers: 45+
(under construction 3)

12. Minneapolis: 3.629 million
Skyscrapers: 40
(under construction 3)

13. San Diego: 3.343 million
Skyscrapers: 37
(under construction 4)

14. Detroit: 4.326 million
Skyscrapers: 37
(under construction 3)

15. Phoenix: 4.857 million
Skyscrapers: 17
(under construction 1)

16. Tampa-St Petersburg: 3.142 million
Skyscrapers: 14
(under construction 3)

17. Washington, DC: 6.249 million
Skyscrapers: Height zoning limits height--none over 300 ft
(under construction none)

18. Riverside-San Bernardino: 4.622 million
Skyscrapers: 0 *all buildings in both cities under 200 feet
(under construction none currently)


Observations:

*New York City blows away all of these by far, more than doubling Chicago, the next closest metro
*At this rate of construction, Seattle will easily be in the top 4 by 2030
*Atlanta's skyscraper growth has slowed considerably the past 8-10 years
*Huge gap between Detroit and then Phoenix and Tampa
*Phoenix and Tampa are not in this skyscraper league at all. They are lagging way behind for such large metro areas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2020, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Medfid
6,808 posts, read 6,049,019 times
Reputation: 5257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago_Person View Post
The top 3 are a big jump from the 3 million metro cut off.
Top 2?

LA is in no way close to NYC or Chicago when it comes to skyscrapers and skylines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2020, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,684 posts, read 9,402,860 times
Reputation: 7267
No competition: New York, Chicago

Above average: Atlanta, Miami, Seattle, San Francisco

Average: Philadelphia, Boston, Houston

Below Average: Dallas, Detroit, Minneapolis, San Diego

Terrible: Los Angeles, Tampa, Phoenix
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 06:52 AM
 
4,344 posts, read 2,812,398 times
Reputation: 5273
I think the numbers for Houston are a little low.
I think Houston has 103 buildings over 100M and 3 under construction.
Houston should be right after Miami.
Check out SSpage
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 07:00 AM
 
Location: New York City
9,380 posts, read 9,342,287 times
Reputation: 6510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
No competition: New York, Chicago

Above average: Atlanta, Miami, Seattle, San Francisco

Average: Philadelphia, Boston, Houston

Below Average: Dallas, Detroit, Minneapolis, San Diego

Terrible: Los Angeles, Tampa, Phoenix
I don't think Philadelphia, Boston or Houston are "Average", but Atlanta should be in the group. Why would Atlanta be in the "above average" with similar numbers to Philadelphia and Boston, and Dallas in "below average" with higher numbers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 07:02 AM
 
Location: New York City
9,380 posts, read 9,342,287 times
Reputation: 6510
The numbers under construction are off for a few cities, based on a search of new sources and the skyscraper forum.

For example, Philadelphia has 8 towers under construction over 300'. There is a 9th, but its basically finished (W Hotel), so I didn't include that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 07:10 AM
 
Location: Medfid
6,808 posts, read 6,049,019 times
Reputation: 5257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago_Person View Post
Population:smac k::smack :
So? LA may have a higher population, but that doesn’t make a difference in this thread.

Anyway, my personal preference might go:

1) NYC
2) Chicago
3) Seattle
4) San Francisco
5) LA
6) Miami
7) Atlanta
8) Philly
9) Dallas
10) Minneapolis
11) Boston
12) Houston
13) San Diego
14) Detroit
15) Tampa
16) Phoenix

Last edited by Boston Shudra; 04-09-2020 at 07:22 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 08:23 AM
 
1,798 posts, read 1,124,913 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
No competition: New York, Chicago

Above average: Atlanta, Miami, Seattle, San Francisco

Average: Philadelphia, Boston, Houston

Below Average: Dallas, Detroit, Minneapolis, San Diego

Terrible: Los Angeles, Tampa, Phoenix
Is your evaluation based purely on population size and quantity of skyscrapers? Not sure how Minneapolis and San Diego are "below average" when they clearly have more 300-footers relative to population than most other metros besides the top 5.

Or are you thinking aesthetics too?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 09:09 AM
 
Location: New York City
9,380 posts, read 9,342,287 times
Reputation: 6510
Quote:
Originally Posted by newgensandiego View Post
Is your evaluation based purely on population size and quantity of skyscrapers? Not sure how Minneapolis and San Diego are "below average" when they clearly have more 300-footers relative to population than most other metros besides the top 5.

Or are you thinking aesthetics too?
I wasn't sure of that myself. Either way I wouldn't consider Philadelphia, Boston or Houston to be "average", especially Philadelphia and Boston since their skylines are among the most varied in the nation (old and new).

I would say the "above average" and "average" groups should be one group with a few standouts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2020, 10:19 AM
 
4,344 posts, read 2,812,398 times
Reputation: 5273
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpomp View Post
Why would Atlanta be in the "above average" with similar numbers to Philadelphia and Boston, and Dallas in "below average" with higher numbers?
Atlanta booster
Quote:
Originally Posted by newgensandiego View Post
Is your evaluation based purely on population size and quantity of skyscrapers? Not sure how Minneapolis and San Diego are "below average" when they clearly have more 300-footers relative to population than most other metros besides the top 5.

Or are you thinking aesthetics too?
It's based purely on boosting ATL
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpomp View Post
I wasn't sure of that myself. Either way I wouldn't consider Philadelphia, Boston or Houston to be "average", especially Philadelphia and Boston since their skylines are among the most varied in the nation (old and new).

I would say the "above average" and "average" groups should be one group with a few standouts.
Houston, Seattle, SF, Minneapolis along with Miami are above average. Houston and Miami with over 100 each has twice the number as DFW, Atlanta, Boston and Philly although they are comparable in size. Minneapolis and Seattle are impressive for their size

Philadelphia, Boston Atlanta and Dallas would be average.
LA below average.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top