Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-18-2020, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Redondo Beach
373 posts, read 252,676 times
Reputation: 182

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post


What? DC has more high rise buildings by definition of a "high rise" being 12 story+ than Boston, Philadelphia, SF, and Seattle. It's urban canyons go way beyond those cities. DC is third largest high rise office district in the country after Midtown Manhattan and Chicago. I don't even see why one would attempt to dispute that. High rise and skyscraper are two totally different things.
This isnt true
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-18-2020, 03:48 PM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
Exactly, the bulk of the urban core of DC IS an urban canyon for the exact same reason that these people are saying it’s not. Because of the lack of skyscrapers and inability to build above 14 stories, you have all four quadrants of the city with evenly scattered clusters of 12-14 story buildings throughout. Boston and Philly both experience a quicker drop off in their DT core much quicker to two story buildings than in DC. Of course a 12/14 story canyon isn’t as deep as a canyon of 30 story buildings. The point is BOTH are considered urban canyons with high rise buildings. Chicago’s and Philly’s are just taller.

We’re not going to get anywhere in this thread obviously since the rest of the posters here have asphyxiation over height, and tall skyscrapers. We could go around in circles for 100 pages here, but this is pointless.
You don’t need tall buildings. Salem Street in Boston’s North End has 5-6 floors but is an urban canyon because the Buildings are much taller than the street their on is wide.

If Dc’s streets were 1/2 as wide as they are with the same height buildings it’s have tons of urban canyons
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2020, 03:49 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ne999 View Post
Could you argue dc has more continuous downtown landscraoers than Chicago? Chicago high rises don’t travel uninterrupted for more than 2ish miles north/south and east/west before hitting residential I don’t think...

The canyons you’re showing for dc may meet the definition but they just don’t have that imposing factor so lose for me on feel...they are just kind of wimpy...they are canyons sure but just don’t pass eye test...I would take San Fran, Seattle, philly, Boston over dc on feel..understood dc maintains the 12 story building urbanity over more distance...I understand this thread doesn’t seem to be about feel
Everything you're speaking of is subjective though.

Boston while having urban canyons in some places, feels wimpy to me because they don't stretch as far as the eye can see like this:

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9013...7i16384!8i8192

What about here? Are these buildings not tall? Do you not have to look up to the sky to see the top of them?

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9047...7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9037...7i16384!8i8192

You see I can be subjective too...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2020, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Again, buildings that short can’t be urban canyons according to Pine. Take that up with him/her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2020, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Redondo Beach
373 posts, read 252,676 times
Reputation: 182
These are a few in SF... Its 3rd behind nyc and chicago

399 Market St
https://maps.app.goo.gl/pxEXtouJQVY5u1xU9

243 Montgomery St
https://maps.app.goo.gl/rHh6g1qVNAM5vwUx7
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2020, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Redondo Beach
373 posts, read 252,676 times
Reputation: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Then what is wrong with my opinion that generally DC has a Building height to Street width ratio so that most streets don’t feel like urban Canyons.

You might feel differently and DC is like 3-4 sq miles of urban canyons but that doesn’t mean I’m wrong if it’s subjective.
DC has impressive core but its buildings are too short imo to compete with cities of equal size when talking about highrise walls and canyons
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2020, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C.
13,727 posts, read 15,751,203 times
Reputation: 4081
Quote:
Originally Posted by tion91 View Post
These are a few in SF... Its 3rd behind nyc and chicago

399 Market St
https://maps.app.goo.gl/pxEXtouJQVY5u1xU9

243 Montgomery St
https://maps.app.goo.gl/rHh6g1qVNAM5vwUx7
Since this is your thread, and you didn’t give a definition or criteria for your thread, could you please provide the exact parameters that defines a high-rise building? Also, could you please provide the minimal distance the street has to run with uninterrupted view when looking down the street to constitute a canyon?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2020, 04:02 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,560,868 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by tion91 View Post
These are a few in SF... Its 3rd behind nyc and chicago

399 Market St
https://maps.app.goo.gl/pxEXtouJQVY5u1xU9

243 Montgomery St
https://maps.app.goo.gl/rHh6g1qVNAM5vwUx7
The problem with this thread is there's too much subjectivity in definition by some here claiming that buildings have to be of a certain height to be "high rise". The definition of high rise is 35 meters or 12 stories, in which DC has more high rise buildings than SF, Boston, Philadelphia, and Seattle.

Two blocks down the street in one direction from where you just posted in SF there are 3 and 4 story buildings:

https://www.google.com/maps/@37.7933...7i16384!8i8192

In the other direction you go two blocks you're at Embarcadero waterfront. So which is it, and what is the standard here? Because there are other cities that hold an even street wall and canyon of over 12 stories for MILES in 4 directions like DC and Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2020, 04:02 PM
 
Location: Redondo Beach
373 posts, read 252,676 times
Reputation: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pine to Vine View Post
Philly is impressive!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2020, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Redondo Beach
373 posts, read 252,676 times
Reputation: 182
A high rise should be the minimum height of the the first highrise ever which was 138ft (42.3 meters). That's how I measure them
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top