Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:08 PM
 
2 posts, read 8,631 times
Reputation: 22

Advertisements

NYC, Chicago, SF, Philly and Boston are pretty universally regarded as the top 5 most traditionally urban cities in the US.

After them, which would you say come next?
I would think DC, Seattle, Baltimore and maybe LA. Maybe Miami, Portland, Pittsburgh, New Orleans?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:17 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,133,368 times
Reputation: 6338
L.a.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:22 PM
 
Location: San Diego
591 posts, read 820,414 times
Reputation: 610
Seattle/DC, then LA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,694,435 times
Reputation: 3668
I would say LA next, since it's urbanize core is larger than the entire cities of DC and Seattle.

I would put DC next, then likely Seattle. After that it gets pretty difficult.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:31 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,915,941 times
Reputation: 7419
DC for sure
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:31 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,133,368 times
Reputation: 6338
D.C is more walkable than LA, but LA is still the more urban city. LA > DC > Seattle. Seattle is also more walkable than LA, but LA is vastly the more urban city.

A nice unique picture of LA's downtown: https://www.flickr.com/photos/piizzi...71974/sizes/h/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,853,364 times
Reputation: 4049
LA and DC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,853,364 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
D.C is more walkable than LA, but LA is still the more urban city. LA > DC > Seattle. Seattle is also more walkable than LA, but LA is vastly the more urban city.

A nice unique picture of LA's downtown: https://www.flickr.com/photos/piizzi...71974/sizes/h/
I don't think as an aggregate Seattle is more walkable. It has the nicer, more walkable very-urban area (downtown and surrounding neighborhoods), but Los Angeles has so many more walkable areas in the middle-urban level - there are a few neighborhoods outside of Seattle's core comparable to Hollywood / West Hollywood / East Hollywood, Miracle Mile, DT Beverly Hills, DT Culver City, DT Santa Monica, DT Pasadena, DT Glendale, DT Burbank, Venice, Westwood. And then there are even more innumerable walkable stretches in other less "destination" type neighborhoods like Boyle Heights, Echo Park, Larchmont, Mid City, Pico Robertson, Fairfax, Mar Vista, Sawtelle, Highland Park, Eagle Rock, South Pasadena, Alhambra - and I could go on for 5 more lines stating all of the little walkable areas all over the city/metro.

I guess you could say Seattle's core is more urban than Los Angeles, but outside of a small area the Los Angeles metro is multiple times more urban and walkable than Seattle's is.

DC's core is even more urban than Seattle's is, and it is more urban over a larger area outside the core. It also has way more satellite cities like Los Angeles does, though the suburbs in between contain a lot less of the "walkable stretch" areas that the LA metro does.

With LA and Seattle, I think that their less-walkable areas are still significantly more walkable than DC's Southern-ish extremely low density suburbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 05:30 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,133,368 times
Reputation: 6338
I agree. Areas like Hollywood is very walkable and very vibrant...I remember visiting LA back in 2012 and walking on Hollywood BLVD thinking to myself how urban and walkable the neighborhood was. Interesting street scene too with some good restaurants. Had great Pizza there. Love LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Fountain Square, Indianapolis
644 posts, read 1,018,415 times
Reputation: 682
LA
DC
Baltimore
Miami
Detroit
Minneapolis
Seattle
Cincinnati
Pittsburgh
St. Louis
New Orleans
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top