Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which cities come to mind first as "Costal Elites"
Boston 128 57.66%
New York City 163 73.42%
Philadelphia 31 13.96%
Baltimore 6 2.70%
Washington DC 101 45.50%
Miami 38 17.12%
Seattle 64 28.83%
San Francisco 151 68.02%
San Jose 36 16.22%
Los Angeles 121 54.50%
San Diego 25 11.26%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 222. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-19-2021, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,169 posts, read 8,026,863 times
Reputation: 10139

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duderino View Post
Because Philadelphia's legacy of wealth and eliteness is so well-known...? I'm not sure where an attitude of exasperation comes from. It really can't be overstated, because it's clear that many folks are very ignorant of this legacy in the modern era.

The fact of the matter is that history is that Philadelphia, at one time, was considered one of the most elite urban centers (if not THE most elite) in the country.

The Main Line remains one of the most tangible, robust enclaves of that legacy of Philadelphia's eliteness, hence why it is brought up. Certainly there are a number of classically urban elite enclaves, such as Rittenhouse Square, Society Hill, Washington Square, Fairmount and Chestnut Hill, but to the extent that the image of Philadelphia's more economically challenged neighborhoods have overshadowed these areas (in the mind of some), the Main Line nowadays represents that legacy most vividly.
Yeah in the 1700s Philadelphia was the elite American city. New York was a small dutch thing.. Boston was inbetween the two.

PHL definitely retained most of that wealth in its Main Line suburbs. Im going there this summer and taking pictures, exploring, doing my thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2021, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Boston Metrowest (via the Philly area)
7,271 posts, read 10,605,875 times
Reputation: 8823
Quote:
Originally Posted by masssachoicetts View Post
Yeah in the 1700s Philadelphia was the elite American city. New York was a small dutch thing.. Boston was inbetween the two.

PHL definitely retained most of that wealth in its Main Line suburbs. Im going there this summer and taking pictures, exploring, doing my thing.
Exactly. And nice to hear you'll be making a trip! Heck, take the Paoli-Thorndale rail line if you can and walk around each stop that piques your interest. Always a more unique and sometimes more immersive way to get around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2021, 09:55 AM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,129 posts, read 7,575,946 times
Reputation: 5796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duderino View Post
Because Philadelphia's legacy of wealth and eliteness is so well-known...? I'm not sure where an attitude of exasperation comes from. It really can't be overstated, because it's clear that many folks are very ignorant of this legacy in the modern era. Like painfully and willfully ignorant.

The fact of the matter is that Philadelphia, at one time, was considered one of the most elite urban centers (if not THE most elite) in the country.

The Main Line remains one of the most tangible, robust enclaves of that legacy of Philadelphia's eliteness, hence why it is brought up. Certainly there are a number of classically urban elite enclaves, such as Rittenhouse Square, Society Hill, Washington Square, Fairmount and Chestnut Hill, but to the extent that the image of Philadelphia's more economically challenged neighborhoods have overshadowed these areas (in the mind of some), the Main Line nowadays represents an image of the legacy most vividly.
True, but nowadays many major or top 10 cities have their own "Main Line" version. Not all as classic in build out, but their own equivalents. A major prestigious suburb is only one aspect, and won't change most people's perception on an entire region or cities "eliteness".

I do think Philly has definite elite value that should be acknowledged, an Ivy league school, and Main Line are great, but the overall city/metro is not viewed by most to have an "elitist" population across the board. Which on most threads across C-D is considered a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2021, 09:57 AM
 
Location: New York City
9,380 posts, read 9,344,945 times
Reputation: 6515
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duderino View Post
Because Philadelphia's legacy of wealth and eliteness is so well-known...? I'm not sure where an attitude of exasperation comes from. It really can't be overstated, because it's clear that many folks are very ignorant of this legacy in the modern era. Like painfully and willfully ignorant.

The fact of the matter is that Philadelphia, at one time, was considered one of the most elite urban centers (if not THE most elite) in the country.

The Main Line remains one of the most tangible, robust enclaves of that legacy of Philadelphia's eliteness, hence why it is brought up. Certainly there are a number of classically urban elite enclaves, such as Rittenhouse Square, Society Hill, Washington Square, Fairmount and Chestnut Hill, but to the extent that the image of Philadelphia's more economically challenged neighborhoods have overshadowed these areas (in the mind of some), the Main Line nowadays represents an image of the legacy most vividly.
Wonderful post. And to add, the Philadelphia region is home to many of the nations most venerable institutions, up there with New York and Boston. The city and region should certainly be included in the "Coastal Elite" conversation, absurdly overlooked.

(this thread has run its course though).

Quote:
Originally Posted by masssachoicetts View Post
Yeah in the 1700s Philadelphia was the elite American city. New York was a small dutch thing.. Boston was inbetween the two.

PHL definitely retained most of that wealth in its Main Line suburbs. Im going there this summer and taking pictures, exploring, doing my thing.
Enjoy! The land near the old Ardrossan Estate is a beautiful drive.

Last edited by cpomp; 05-19-2021 at 11:04 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top