Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-22-2021, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,698 posts, read 12,836,228 times
Reputation: 11257

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by citidata18 View Post
Your guess is as good as anyone's.

Originally, it was going to be the end of April. But it appears this might have pushed out again (maybe as late as September?).
More likely September thats when ACS numbers come out for places with a population of 65,000+. September 23rd

The 2016-2020 Five year estimates for places of 30-65k don't come out till December 9th.

I wouldn't expect official Census numbers until December at the earliest.

https://www.census.gov/programs-surv...-schedule.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2021, 02:29 PM
 
4,159 posts, read 2,861,640 times
Reputation: 5517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
I don't have an inside track, and you know that. I've been reading about people moving this past year, though, and census numbers will be off for that reason, as well. If you think numbers are the same this year, as compared to last year, you actually know you would be wrong. It would just be wishful thinking, for some cities. Census numbers will be off....explain how they won't be, if you think differently.
I mean there will always be a lagging factor with any of these numbers. The 2021 census estimates might make for an interesting read as it tries and capture some of what the census missed. But all indications is Covid hasn’t really changed the calculus on winners/losers the last decade, just intensified it. It’s unlikely we will see anything too shocking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2021, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,664 posts, read 67,596,324 times
Reputation: 21255
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwj119 View Post
Both too big/important to fail, but I think both will suffer this year more than most.

To Enean's point, this data should change rather dramatically for coastal and legacy cities i'd assume. Less for for southern and sunbelt cities.
Yeah recent developments have largely denunked the notion that CA is having an exodus any greater than normal, and the Bay Area specifically isnt really changing much.

US Postal Service: Only 3.7% of Household and Business Address Changes that Originate in the Bay Area are Out-of-State

Only 4,000 out of 115,000 household and business address changes during the pandemic are out-of-state, that's 3.7%----1.0% moved to Washington State, and 0.6% moved to Texas.
https://s.hdnux.com/photos/01/16/64/...8/7/1200x0.jpg

% of movers who relocated out-of-state
6% San Francisco
5% Santa Clara
2% Alameda
2% Contra Costa
1% Marin
1% San Mateo

% of movers who relocated elsewhere in CA
37% Santa Clara
24% Alameda
19% Contra Costa
13% San Francisco
7% Marin
7% San Mateo

% of movers who relocate within 9-county Bay Area

92% San Mateo
91% Marin
81% San Francisco
79% Contra Costa
74% Alameda
58% Santa Clara

The biggest county-to-county shift during this pandemic has not been from San Francisco to some out-of-state location but from Santa Clara to Sacramento and the Central Valley. That far outstrips any migration to Seattle or Austin or anywhere else.

So 94% of folks who left SF relocated within CA and 81% moved to neighboring counties.

Last edited by JMT; 03-22-2021 at 05:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2021, 03:53 PM
 
Location: West Seattle
6,387 posts, read 5,025,282 times
Reputation: 8469
I mean CA lost population for the first time ever last year. That might just mean the outflow is normal, but almost no one's moving there now --- that's at least supposedly what's happening in Seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2021, 05:04 PM
 
4,159 posts, read 2,861,640 times
Reputation: 5517
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Yeah recent developments have largely denunked the notion that CA is having an exodus any greater than normal, and the Bay Area specifically isnt really changing much.

US Postal Service: Only 3.7% of Household and Business Address Changes that Originate in the Bay Area are Out-of-State

Only 4,000 out of 115,000 household and business address changes during the pandemic are out-of-state, that's 3.7%----1.0% moved to Washington State, and 0.6% moved to Texas.


% of movers who relocated out-of-state
6% San Francisco
5% Santa Clara
2% Alameda
2% Contra Costa
1% Marin
1% San Mateo

% of movers who relocated elsewhere in CA
37% Santa Clara
24% Alameda
19% Contra Costa
13% San Francisco
7% Marin
7% San Mateo

% of movers who relocate within 9-county Bay Area

92% San Mateo
91% Marin
81% San Francisco
79% Contra Costa
74% Alameda
58% Santa Clara

The biggest county-to-county shift during this pandemic has not been from San Francisco to some out-of-state location but from Santa Clara to Sacramento and the Central Valley. That far outstrips any migration to Seattle or Austin or anywhere else.

So 94% of folks who left SF relocated within CA and 81% moved to neighboring counties.
It is 4000 households (and businesses). So maybe around 10,000 people. During a 6 month period where we were told not to leave your house and the labor market nationwide was frugal. California’s government is predicting net exits increased 650% from the Bay Area from 2019. So while yes the movement was mostly in-state, there was a big increase in the intensity of the movement and California will almost assuredly have another year with less people than it had at it’s peak 3 or 4 years ago. That’s West Virginia and Illinois territory of no growth eek.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2021, 05:57 PM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,898,546 times
Reputation: 4908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heel82 View Post
It is 4000 households (and businesses). So maybe around 10,000 people. During a 6 month period where we were told not to leave your house and the labor market nationwide was frugal. California’s government is predicting net exits increased 650% from the Bay Area from 2019. So while yes the movement was mostly in-state, there was a big increase in the intensity of the movement and California will almost assuredly have another year with less people than it had at it’s peak 3 or 4 years ago. That’s West Virginia and Illinois territory of no growth eek.
And New York, let's not forget New York, which has lost even more...eek.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2021, 06:01 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,192,238 times
Reputation: 14762
Omaha??? Last I checked, the city grew more than its county because the city primarily grew through annexation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2021, 06:18 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,664 posts, read 67,596,324 times
Reputation: 21255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heel82 View Post
It is 4000 households (and businesses). So maybe around 10,000 people. During a 6 month period where we were told not to leave your house and the labor market nationwide was frugal. California’s government is predicting net exits increased 650% from the Bay Area from 2019. So while yes the movement was mostly in-state, there was a big increase in the intensity of the movement and California will almost assuredly have another year with less people than it had at it’s peak 3 or 4 years ago. That’s West Virginia and Illinois territory of no growth eek.
Yeah those estimates have since been retracted and debunked, due to actual data.

This story is from March 5, 2021 and is titled: Study: Reports Of Mass Exodus From California in 2020 Are False

Fewer people moved in due to the pandemic but outward migration was actually normal...I know that must be disappointing to Enean and others...but here:

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBS News Bay Area
Departures from the state were consistent with historical patterns but the biggest statewide change was fewer people moving into California, the lab said in a press release.
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/20...020-are-false/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2021, 06:37 PM
 
Location: Elk Grove, CA
580 posts, read 516,928 times
Reputation: 1099
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post

The biggest county-to-county shift during this pandemic has not been from San Francisco to some out-of-state location but from Santa Clara to Sacramento and the Central Valley. That far outstrips any migration to Seattle or Austin or anywhere else.

So 94% of folks who left SF relocated within CA and 81% moved to neighboring counties.
Yeah we are seeing it big time in Sacramento County. The gap between Rents and Home Prices between the Sac-Joaquin region and the Bay Area has gotten a bit smaller too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2021, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,555 posts, read 2,344,435 times
Reputation: 3807
Quote:
Originally Posted by mascoma View Post
Looks like Baltimore is the new Detroit.
It still #10 or #11 in the country by population radius so no.. I wouldn’t call it the new Detroit as there population losses are different
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top