Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2021, 06:21 AM
 
Location: the future
2,616 posts, read 4,692,545 times
Reputation: 1603

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
SF: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table...ST1Y2019.S1903



Ive never seen anything to indicate that DC (today) is inherently more hard knock than other cities Ive listed. And countless metrics corroborate that. Its just a different culture in regard to gun violence specifically.
Thats bc you have to know the history and the neighborhood beefs from the past. You have to be on mantime when everybody around you is ready to test you or try you. I dont know if that can be explained on paper. Yes theres jobs and opportunity on paper but theres also real hoods and poverty too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2021, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,819 posts, read 13,031,387 times
Reputation: 11336
Quote:
Originally Posted by boreatwork View Post
Thats bc you have to know the history and the neighborhood beefs from the past. You have to be on mantime when everybody around you is ready to test you or try you. I dont know if that can be explained on paper. Yes theres jobs and opportunity on paper but theres also real hoods and poverty too.
Agree
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2021, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Northern United States
824 posts, read 721,187 times
Reputation: 1495
It might also have to do with neighborhoods being “unstable”. There might be a lot of families moving around DC because of gentrification, and depending on the circumstances, that leads to higher crime, especially among teenagers/young adults because of disconnection. This is more a hypothesis though and I’ve read about it, but I’m not sure how much actual data there is.

South Shore and Austin are two neighborhoods in Chicago that used to be firmly black-middle class, but after a lot of projects got demolished, those areas changed a lot despite still having many middle-class home owners around. Plenty of blocks in those two neighborhoods are made up of well-maintained single family homes, and then there are sections of high-density 3-4 connected apartment blocks and that’s where a lot of crime is super concentrated, and even then a lot of these apartment buildings aren’t terrible looking, it’s just a lot of the residents there are in distress and may have moved from demolished public housing(I don’t know the exact data however). So despite those neighborhoods having plenty of more middle class areas, the homicide rates are among the worst in the city because there are plenty of low-income people who are in bad situations also living in those areas.

I think there has also always been a trend of middle and upper income black people/families living in mixed-economic areas and this is a legacy of extreme housing covenants and segregation. The Cicero race riots are a good example of the blacklash upper-income black people faced when moving to areas that were a bit more upscale. A black couple who had graduated from Fisk University, tried moving into a apartment that had been leased to them in 1951, and the apartment building was surrounded by thousands of white residents and the entire building was set on fire.

It really wasn’t until the mid-1970s that a lot of that type of aggressive segregation went away, and I think there is still a lot of vestiges of that legacy that effect where black people might want to live.

Last edited by Northeasterner1970; 04-28-2021 at 02:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2021, 04:31 AM
 
Location: Flyover part of Virginia
4,337 posts, read 2,526,582 times
Reputation: 5160
Columbus, KCMO, and Indy all come to mind- cities that are doing well on paper, but consistently have much higher than average homicide rates. Their homicides and gun violence are even worse than they look on paper when you consider that the vast majority of land area in all three cities are post war sprawlburbia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2021, 08:48 AM
 
Location: the future
2,616 posts, read 4,692,545 times
Reputation: 1603
Default boredatwork

I guess you can throw Atlanta in the mix as well. The homicide rate was a tick higher than DC last year but is the center of the south.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2021, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 12,025,961 times
Reputation: 5813
Indianapolis


City population 870,000


homicides 245


Indianapolis MSA GDP is approximately the 28th largest in the nation, at around $140 billion annually.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2021, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Northern United States
824 posts, read 721,187 times
Reputation: 1495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taggerung View Post
Columbus, KCMO, and Indy all come to mind- cities that are doing well on paper, but consistently have much higher than average homicide rates. Their homicides and gun violence are even worse than they look on paper when you consider that the vast majority of land area in all three cities are post war sprawlburbia.
Yep, I would say Columbus seems to be a bit less violent than KC and Indianapolis but still. Kansas City east of Troost is in really bad shape, and it makes up a good chunk of the core. Honestly not sure what Indianapolis’ deal is though. Like there are a lot of really rough areas but many of them are gentrifying and none look like areas of Detroit, Cleveland etc. However, it also seems like some-of the more post-World War 2 areas of these cities are in rough shape as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2021, 06:27 PM
 
Location: Flyover part of Virginia
4,337 posts, read 2,526,582 times
Reputation: 5160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northeasterner1970 View Post
Yep, I would say Columbus seems to be a bit less violent than KC and Indianapolis but still. Kansas City east of Troost is in really bad shape, and it makes up a good chunk of the core. Honestly not sure what Indianapolis’ deal is though. Like there are a lot of really rough areas but many of them are gentrifying and none look like areas of Detroit, Cleveland etc. However, it also seems like some-of the more post-World War 2 areas of these cities are in rough shape as well.
Indy:
https://youtu.be/-TjhVAn8eGo

Those neighborhoods appear to be post-war construction- imo the neighborhoods in the first few minutes of the video look just as dilapidated and bleak as anything you'll see in Cleveland, Detroit, or St Louis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2021, 08:33 PM
 
6,621 posts, read 16,642,436 times
Reputation: 4792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northeasterner1970 View Post
It might also have to do with neighborhoods being “unstable”. There might be a lot of families moving around DC because of gentrification, and depending on the circumstances, that leads to higher crime, especially among teenagers/young adults because of disconnection. This is more a hypothesis though and I’ve read about it, but I’m not sure how much actual data there is.

South Shore and Austin are two neighborhoods in Chicago that used to be firmly black-middle class, but after a lot of projects got demolished, those areas changed a lot despite still having many middle-class home owners around. Plenty of blocks in those two neighborhoods are made up of well-maintained single family homes, and then there are sections of high-density 3-4 connected apartment blocks and that’s where a lot of crime is super concentrated, and even then a lot of these apartment buildings aren’t terrible looking, it’s just a lot of the residents there are in distress and may have moved from demolished public housing(I don’t know the exact data however). So despite those neighborhoods having plenty of more middle class areas, the homicide rates are among the worst in the city because there are plenty of low-income people who are in bad situations also living in those areas.

I think there has also always been a trend of middle and upper income black people/families living in mixed-economic areas and this is a legacy of extreme housing covenants and segregation. The Cicero race riots are a good example of the blacklash upper-income black people faced when moving to areas that were a bit more upscale. A black couple who had graduated from Fisk University, tried moving into a apartment that had been leased to them in 1951, and the apartment building was surrounded by thousands of white residents and the entire building was set on fire.

It really wasn’t until the mid-1970s that a lot of that type of aggressive segregation went away, and I think there is still a lot of vestiges of that legacy that effect where black people might want to live.
FYI, Austin was predominately white middle class until the 1970s and South Shore was too. Had a friend who grew up in South Shore as it was transitioning from white to black.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2021, 11:09 PM
 
37,929 posts, read 42,216,291 times
Reputation: 27375
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
I would never bring suburbs into a conversation surrounding inner-city homicide myself. Its a totally different dynamic, socioeconomics, and criminal culture. It does this conversation no justice whatsoever. But this is what suburbanites do-include themselves and their towns in conversation regarding cities no matter what the topic is.
I don't think the whole MSA needs to be taken into account, but bringing jurisdictions adjacent to the city proper is fair game IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top