Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That’s accurate to a degree. I also meant that they be noticeable and stand out, which would involve them being clustered to some degree anyway. To me a cluster is at least 5 within walking distance to each other, thus making their overall presence more noticeable.
Houston has some nice new tall towers though.
Houston has areas with multiple (more than 5) within walking distance from each other, they are just not lining a main drag like peachtree.
You said you were in Uptown, I can think of:
Highland
Wilshire
Belfiore
Arabella
Willowick
Park Square
Montebello
Houston Estates
Woodway
Montebello
Astoria
Cosmopolitan
Four leaf
Manhattan
Hanover Post Oak
Texas
St James
Oxford
Mercer
This are just the ones I can think of.
There are tons more that are not 15 plus floors and Iam sure that Iam missing some that are 15 plus.
There are a many in the Museum District - UK area
And as many in the Montrose- River Oaks area
There are clusters Downtown and more along Allen Parkway. Midtown was previously a midrise strong hold but hirise condos are starting to pop up there too
Video of a friend's friend who is studying in Atlanta from Korea and living in a highrise in midtown (Studio for $1650 a month). It's all in Korean but you can get a feel of studio living.
Pittsburgh - Tier B
Austin
Baltimore
Dallas
Houston
Denver
This pretty much sums it up... each category no city is listed above or below they all kind of fill into the same class of density/projects and "apartment dwellings"..
In terms of high rise luxury condos that are 25+ stories...
I believe the only cities that have any substantial market are:
NYC
Chicago
Miami
LA
Boston
San Fran
Philadelphia
Seattle
Atlanta
Dallas has grown 12.2% 2010-2019 while Atlanta has grown 20.5%. Metro Atlanta has grown 13.5%, Metro Dallas grew 17.3%. Nashville Grew 11.7%, Metro Nashville grew 19.2%. Houston grew 10.5%, Metro Houston grew 20.2%. Las Vegas grew 11.6%, Metro Las Vegas grew 18.6%.
Charlotte grew 20.2% Metro Charlotte 19.6%.
So Atlanta is a city really outpacing it’s metro in the South. Houston, Dallas, Nashville, Charlotte, And others are not.
Dallas has grown 12.2% 2010-2019 while Atlanta has grown 20.5%. Metro Atlanta has grown 13.5%, Metro Dallas grew 17.3%. Nashville Grew 11.7%, Metro Nashville grew 19.2%. Houston grew 10.5%, Metro Houston grew 20.2%. Las Vegas grew 11.6%, Metro Las Vegas grew 18.6%.
Charlotte grew 20.2% Metro Charlotte 19.6%.
So Atlanta is a city really outpacing it’s metro in the South. Houston, Dallas, Nashville, Charlotte, And others are not.
Let's not be shifty with stats here.
Percentages work when you are comparing things of similar quantity.
Atlanta city has what 400k people?
Houston has 2,300 k people?
A 20% increase for Atlanta means 80k, while Houston 10% means 250K. So we are not measuring the same thing.
Atlanta city is the smallest city of all the cities you mentioned so a proportional increase is going to have a higher percentage than the others.
2nd you throw out a few cities to try to support the argument but failed to include the faster growing cities.
Or is the implication that the cities you mentioned are the only sunbelt cities?
Where is Austin? Orlando? And dozens of other sunbelt cities growing faster than Atlanta.
I mean if you have stats for 100 sq miles for Atlanta and want to compare it to 100 sq miles for other cities you might be able to make a point.
But 20% of 400k is not more than 10% of 2,300k. That's just deceptive stats
Let's not be shifty with stats here.
Percentages work when you are comparing things of similar quantity.
Atlanta city has what 400k people?
Houston has 2,300 k people?
A 20% increase for Atlanta means 80k, while Houston 10% means 250K. So we are not measuring the same thing.
Atlanta city is the smallest city of all the cities you mentioned so a proportional increase is going to have a higher percentage than the others.
2nd you throw out a few cities to try to support the argument but failed to include the faster growing cities.
Or is the implication that the cities you mentioned are the only sunbelt cities?
Where is Austin? Orlando? And dozens of other sunbelt cities growing faster than Atlanta.
I mean if you have stats for 100 sq miles for Atlanta and want to compare it to 100 sq miles for other cities you might be able to make a point.
But 20% of 400k is not more than 10% of 2,300k. That's just deceptive stats
Fine, Fulton County grew by 17.7% and is easily comparable to most city limits. Still faster than the metro as a whole.
Also Orland grew faster than Atlanta but slower than its metro 20.6% vs 23.3%
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
