Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-04-2021, 10:26 AM
 
626 posts, read 463,612 times
Reputation: 672

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by R1070 View Post
That FW growth is taking place in far out land that extends into exurbia that is within the city limits of FW. There’s been some smaller scale development downtown with a few high rises, but most new development in the core has been low to mid rise development.

What's really crazy is that a lot of the largest and fastest growing urbanized areas are actually losing population density every year. They just keep building single family homes around the outside of the metro instead of infilling with multifamily etc. It's a pretty sad situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-06-2021, 10:49 PM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,726 posts, read 6,724,376 times
Reputation: 7580
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjbradleynyc View Post

11 Boston, 55+ total, with 5+ under construction

4 San Francisco, 100+ total, with 5+ under construction
Have lived in both, but was recently back in Boston and the skyline definitely felt smaller than SF's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2021, 05:46 AM
 
Location: Medfid
6,807 posts, read 6,038,878 times
Reputation: 5252
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheseGoTo11 View Post
Have lived in both, but was recently back in Boston and the skyline definitely felt smaller than SF's.
The skyline's always been underwhelming for a city its size, but you must've noticed the drastic change? Including the Winthrop Center, 3 out of the 5 tallest buildings in the city were built in the last 10 years. South Station Tower will be #7 (I think) when it's finished.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2021, 12:31 PM
 
1,393 posts, read 860,383 times
Reputation: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Shudra View Post
The skyline's always been underwhelming for a city its size, but you must've noticed the drastic change? Including the Winthrop Center, 3 out of the 5 tallest buildings in the city were built in the last 10 years. South Station Tower will be #7 (I think) when it's finished.
Winthrop not really visible yet…getting there…Winthrop and govt center garage tower will be the two most stunning in skyline when complete…
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2021, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,161 posts, read 7,997,139 times
Reputation: 10134
From 2016-2025, Boston will have had 5/10 of its tallest built

One Dalton- 741ft (2017)
Winthrop Center- 691ft (2022)
Millennium Tower- 681ft (2016)
South Station Tower- 678ft (2024)
SSHQ- 647ft (2022)

The bulk of Boston’s construction has been/will continue to be 200-485ft.

This year, we have had roughly 20 approvals in Boston, within this range.

Development will not slow (its actually picking up…), but I think SST will be the last 600Ft+ for a while. Which is okay, I do not really like super talls or 600+ footers if not done right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2021, 03:19 PM
 
1,526 posts, read 1,985,611 times
Reputation: 1529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joakim3 View Post
This is a list of completed +200’ buildings in each city. Paints a lot different picture in skyline size as buildings in the 200’ range play a huge roll in skyline infill/visual density.

Houston - 281+
SF - 223
Philly - 181
Dallas - 171
Boston - 156 (Does not include Cambridge)
Seattle - 147

Denver - 98
MSP - 93
SD - 86
St. Louis - 76
Austin - 68
Pittsburgh - 65+ (Does not include Clayton)
Baltimore - 65+ (Does not include Towson)
Portland - 61
Charlotte - 58

NYC, Chicago, Miami, LA are all major step above the “top” tier

MSP as in the Minneapolis - St. Paul metro area? If so, the metro is well over 93. Heck, the core cities of Minneapolis and St Paul have over 100.


I'd say at this point, give it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2021, 04:03 PM
 
Location: OC
12,830 posts, read 9,552,972 times
Reputation: 10620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losfrisco View Post
I wonder where the significant population density is?


We've been hearing about how "crazy" growth there is for several decades now.


Population density right around where Albuquerque is.
Not sure. Both cities are your typical sunbelt sprawls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2021, 05:04 PM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,527 posts, read 2,320,333 times
Reputation: 3774
Quote:
Originally Posted by YIMBY View Post
MSP as in the Minneapolis - St. Paul metro area? If so, the metro is well over 93. Heck, the core cities of Minneapolis and St Paul have over 100.


I'd say at this point, give it up.
MSP, as in the two city proper's, not the entire metro.

Minneapolis + St. Paul, cumulatively have ~93 completed buildings over 200' (Minneapolis has a hair over 80)

So again, what am I exactly giving up?

Last edited by Joakim3; 08-07-2021 at 06:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2021, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,161 posts, read 7,997,139 times
Reputation: 10134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ne999 View Post
Winthrop not really visible yet…getting there…Winthrop and govt center garage tower will be the two most stunning in skyline when complete…
The view from the Milk Bottle will be so impressive of the Winthrop Tower. As will the Common. It's starting to pierce up.

SSHQ fits very well where it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2021, 06:06 PM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,527 posts, read 2,320,333 times
Reputation: 3774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losfrisco View Post
Houston has one building over 1000 feet.


If we go by the universal definition of skyscraper, a building 492 feet or taller, then yes, nearly all of the skyscrapers in Los Angeles city are within a few mile radius downtown. Hollywood doesn't even have a 300 foot structure, so high rises in general around the city are of course there, but not really as prominent as you imply. You included Long Beach for some reason, another city over 20 miles away.

So going by actual skyscrapers, Los Angeles has considerably more in a smaller area than Philadelphia, Boston, or Seattle and is ahead of San Francisco (31 minus two in Century City and one in the Valley, vs 27 in San Francisco).

Supertall cut off is 300m, not 1000'. So yes, Houston has 2 supertalls. The JPMorgan Chase Tower (305m) & the Wells Fargo Bank Plaza (302m)

Regarding skyscrapers..... LA has 31 (28 in DT), SF has 27, Boston has 26, Seattle has 24 while Philly trails at "only" 19 (despite it being the only city outside of NYC, Chicago & Houston with 3 or more +900' tall buildings)

So yeah I stand by my statement that LA does not have a "considerably" more skyscrapers (or high-rises) in its core than any of those cities I listed when 36 sq. mi Miami (proper) alone has 57 completed buildings over 150m and 103 over 400' for context.

Last edited by Joakim3; 08-07-2021 at 06:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top