Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Most scenic metro?
Atlanta, GA 15 16.67%
Birmingham, AL 5 5.56%
Boston, MA 10 11.11%
Buffalo, NY 1 1.11%
Charlotte, NC 1 1.11%
Cincinnati, OH 2 2.22%
Houston, TX 4 4.44%
Miami, FL 16 17.78%
Minneapolis, MN 1 1.11%
Pittsburgh, PA 24 26.67%
Raleigh, NC 0 0%
Rochester, NY 2 2.22%
San Antonio, TX 0 0%
Virginia Beach-Norfolk, VA 4 4.44%
Other (Please list) 5 5.56%
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-10-2022, 08:21 AM
 
136 posts, read 134,326 times
Reputation: 141

Advertisements

Since we've held regional polls for the South, Midwest and Northeast, why not combine the winners (and runner-ups) of all three? I'm also including some notable exemptions of the original polls.

What do you personally think is the most naturally scenic metro in the central and eastern U.S.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-10-2022, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
2,991 posts, read 3,429,168 times
Reputation: 4944
Miami
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2022, 08:50 AM
 
405 posts, read 395,921 times
Reputation: 901
Never been to Pittsburgh, but see people on here frequently saying it’s scenic. Why isn’t it more of tourist destination?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2022, 08:54 AM
 
4,344 posts, read 2,822,482 times
Reputation: 5273
Interesting that San Antonio is listed but Austin isn't.

I like Birmingham and Pittsburgh natural settings
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2022, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Chicago- Hyde Park
4,079 posts, read 10,404,673 times
Reputation: 2658
For me Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Atlanta….Buffalo metro is scenic because of Niagara Falls, Niagara River, Lake Erie and Lake Ontario
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2022, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Oklahoma
374 posts, read 258,423 times
Reputation: 970
Of these choices I think Pittsburgh would win by a landslide, though Austin (not mentioned), Birmingham, KCMO (not mentioned), and Cincinnati all have really pretty and scenic spots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2022, 11:00 AM
 
544 posts, read 562,269 times
Reputation: 948
Pittsburgh has the nice combination of rivers and mountains winding together in a nice, compact layout which works gorgeously together (though I'll never live there since hills near water + snow terrify me).

Points for Birmingham for having a National Natural Landmark right next to the downtown area. :P Preserving the green areas like Ruffner Mountain, Red Mountain, Oak Mountain and Lake Purdy is paying off.

As a side note, I'm kinda surprised to not see Nashville considering it's pretty similar to some of the other inland South cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2022, 11:04 AM
 
3,217 posts, read 2,365,246 times
Reputation: 2742
Chattanooga, TN
Asheville NC
Austin easily over San Antonio too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2022, 11:32 AM
 
Location: Flawduh
17,271 posts, read 15,467,080 times
Reputation: 23828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losfrisco View Post
In MIami's case, tropical does not equal scenic, IMO.

Miami is scenic in the same way Milwaukee or Cleveland is.

I voted Pittsburgh.
I disagree...
The tropical vegetation of Miami has a huge impact on its scenery. That and the bright blue waters of Biscayne Bay set it far apart from Milwaukee and Cleveland.

I'm no fan of Miami in general, but the comparison to those two cities is quite puzzling. The only thing they have in common is a skyline built along a coastline. And the Great Lakes is not the same as the Atlantic Ocean or Biscayne Bay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2022, 12:20 PM
 
133 posts, read 96,263 times
Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by nadnerb View Post
In what way? Unlike Miami, Singapore is actually located within the tropics.

Either way, Miami is certainly not the only tropical first world urban area.

Do you want me to just start naming all the major ways in which Singapore and Miami are completely different? In my mind the Miami area is the only large urban area in the first world with a tropical vibe. Singapore might as well be on a different planet.






Miami is technically tropical




Last edited by Harbits; 01-10-2022 at 01:39 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top