Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which of these states have the best example of preserved historical urban environments along their c
Georgia 13 32.50%
Florida 5 12.50%
South Carolina 21 52.50%
North Carolina 1 2.50%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-13-2022, 10:09 PM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
Calling Conway and Summerville "coastal" is kinda pushing it. It's almost like claiming Richmond is a coastal city in Virginia.
If Conway is pushing it, then Savannah is in the same boat as it is actually a little farther from the coast than Conway is. And Summerville is urbanized Charleston through and through.

Quote:
Also, the historic fabric is...eh? Good for the south, but nothing spectacular. A few blocks of 19th century storefronts, some old churches, wood framed homes, etc. You can tell they were towns of a few thousand people in the antebellum era, not substantial cities.

You can honestly find better historic fabric than that in just about any random small town in eastern Pennsylvania.
Yes, we're talking about Southern states here so all of this is a given.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2022, 10:21 PM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
The question is where you draw the line though. If you use the historic "fall line" (where the piedmont ends and the coastal plain begins), then you could say Rocky Mount/Greenville/Wilson/Goldsboro/Fayetteville are all coastal NC cities, that Columbia is a coastal SC city, that Augusta is a coastal Georgia city, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2022, 10:38 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,165,301 times
Reputation: 14762
There's a difference between being coastal and being on the coastal plain. In the Carolinas and Georgia, there's a lot of coastal plain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2022, 10:51 PM
 
16,701 posts, read 29,526,453 times
Reputation: 7671
Quote:
Originally Posted by FL_Expert View Post
Brunswick doesn’t strike me as that historic, definitely not like Beaufort.
Um, Brunswick is totally historic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2022, 05:53 AM
 
Location: Mobile,Al(the city by the bay)
5,003 posts, read 9,157,880 times
Reputation: 1959
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDFan View Post
The only historic area in FL that is really THAT coastal are older parts of Jacksonville (but it's a really small slice) and St. Augustine.
Pensacola
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2022, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Mobile
865 posts, read 589,289 times
Reputation: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by PortCity View Post
Pensacola
Indeed, Pensacola was founded a whole 250 years before Jacksonville, Pensacola just might be older than most if not all the cities that have been discussed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2022, 09:19 AM
 
4,159 posts, read 2,851,262 times
Reputation: 5517
Pensacola wasn’t founded in the 1500s. It had a settlement there, but it was abandoned for over a century. Just like Manteo doesn’t claim its founding with the Lost Colony. Historic Pensacola has buildings from around the beginning of the 19th century I think. St. Augustine is the more historic Florida (and American) town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2022, 09:07 PM
 
110 posts, read 92,478 times
Reputation: 51
I used to frequent st Augustine in the 90s, early 2000s...it was a nice quaint beach town...went there a couple years ago and could not believe how much it changed. Beach side extremely busy with very "uppity attitude" types. I used to love St Augustine but it has definitely changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2022, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Richmond, Va
2 posts, read 914 times
Reputation: 23
Charleston and Savannah are the unquestionable leaders if the metric is the surviving amount of antebellum structures in their historic cores. While Savannah is perhaps the most atmospheric and contains hundreds of 19th century structures, it really can’t hold a candle to the antiquity of Charleston’s oldest buildings. Surveys of both historic districts show that there are 100s of surviving 18th century buildings in Charleston while Savannah contains a mere handful. Tradd street alone in the south of broad neighborhood contains several times more pre revolutionary buildings than all of Savannah. While Charleston did indeed suffer great destruction during the war, it is not true that even a majority of the city was destroyed. Similar to Richmond’s destruction, the damage was extensive and total in some concentrated areas while leaving much of the city relatively intact. Additionally, Charleston’s many hundreds of antebellum buildings stretch throughout the peninsula and outnumber Savannah’s impressive total.

Depending how you measure it, St. Augustine or Georgetown actually contain more 18th century buildings than Savannah, but Savannah still blows either away by the sheer number of surviving antebellum structures. Outside of St. Augustine, Florida does not really have any really significant historic towns, which makes since given its rather pitiful population and state of urbanization in the early days of the republic. St. Augustine really is a sad case, as the tourism and commercialization is so extensive that it makes what would be a very beautiful and unique small city feel like a cross between Disney world and colonial Williamsburg.

New Bern and Wilmington are North Carolina’s best surviving examples, but neither come close to Charleston or Savannah. A list of the populations of cities and towns in the four states being discussed illustrates the state of urbanization at the time of the 1790 census. Most of these numbers are close estimates based on Spanish colonial censuses or the 1800 census data if 1790 is missing.

Charleston, SC- 16,359
Savannah, GA- ~4,000
New Bern, NC- ~2,250
St. Augustine, FL- ~2,000
Wilmington, NC- ~1,550
Augusta, GA- ~1,500
Pensacola, FL- ~1,000

Compare this to a list of southern cities in 1860, and you will get a relatively good idea of the prominence of cities and towns during these eras. Of course, the historical populations don’t completely account for a city’s current state of historic preservation, but they are pretty useful for understanding the potential for a certain area to contain preserved buildings. For example, the three largest southern cities in 1860 (NO, Charleston, Richmond) have 3 of the 4 best preserved urban cores. Savannah wasn’t quite on their level population wise but still boasts a remarkable degree of surviving buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2022, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
9,818 posts, read 7,933,624 times
Reputation: 9991
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
Key West is absolutely historic (it was the largest city in Florida in the 19th century). It's just not really southern in terms of either architecture or culture.



Charleston has lots of surviving pre-Civil War buildings (some going back to the 18th century), though the classic "Charleston house" (narrow, often brick, side entrance) was built as late as 1890.

I prefer Savannah's architecture, and the Olmstead plan is wonderful because there is so much green space. Charleston was a city of wealthy estates, meaning very little space was set aside for parkland. However, Savannah's rowhouse vernacular really isn't that unique nationally - it's basically a Mid-Atlantic city which happens to be in the Deep South. Charleston doesn't look like anywhere else in the country however.



This is underselling Virginia a bit, because there are beautiful historic portions of Norfolk and Portsmouth as well.

Virginia's not in the poll, but I would probably put it in second after SC, taking into account all of that and Old Town Alexandria. If you included Richmond as "coastal" it would be even clearer, since Richmond has a pretty wide selection of rowhouse-ish neighborhoods within the urban core (probably 50,000 people live in this area, making it much more functionally like a city than the tourist-dominated downtown areas of Charleston and Savannah).
Savannah's famous Squares were designed by Englishman James Oglethorpe in the 1730's, not Olmstead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top