Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which West Coast City/Metro Area? (Listed from North to South)
Seattle 20 34.48%
Portland 4 6.90%
San Francisco (Bay Area) 5 8.62%
Los Angeles 26 44.83%
San Diego 1 1.72%
Other - Please Name 2 3.45%
Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-26-2022, 09:05 AM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,211 posts, read 3,293,492 times
Reputation: 4133

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnGuterson View Post
San Diego and Portland are definitely better than theyre getting credit for.
A light rail station 3 miles from downtown Seattle:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Th...4d-122.2969701

A light rail station 14 miles from downtown San Diego:
:https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7645...7i16384!8i8192
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-26-2022, 09:22 AM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
Check that Seattle station out in 2030...the topic of this thread. It won't be cute, but it'll be heavily populated.

I like San Diego, but if LA and Portland have bad transit commute stats SD is utterly horrific based on 2019, like the worst Sunbelt sprawlers. New rail will help but only incrementally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2022, 10:30 AM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,211 posts, read 3,293,492 times
Reputation: 4133
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
Check that Seattle station out in 2030...the topic of this thread. It won't be cute, but it'll be heavily populated.

I like San Diego, but if LA and Portland have bad transit commute stats SD is utterly horrific based on 2019, like the worst Sunbelt sprawlers. New rail will help but only incrementally.
Bringing up byzantine transit share stats (what an unexpected surprise!) can't whitewash Seattle's downtown adjacent suburban transit stops. The fact is that Seattle had to be dragged kicking and screaming just to get into the light rail game in the 2000's. The funniest thing about all this is that they now shout from the rooftops of what an urban/transit mecca they are, something San Diego has never done despite being a national pioneer in next generation light rail.

In 2030, Seattle's Link will still be five miles shorter than the San Diego Trolley, despite it's task of serving a 20% larger metro area.


Anyhow, back on the fact of how ridiculous it is that Seattle would be anywhere close to Los Angeles:

Here's what a subway entrance three miles from downtown Los Angeles looks like:
https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0622...7i16384!8i8192

Here's what a light rail station 15 miles from downtown Los Angeles looks like:

https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0137...7i16384!8i8192

Here's what a light rail station 25 miles from downtown Los Angeles looks like:

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.7688...7i16384!8i8192
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2022, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
2,991 posts, read 3,420,434 times
Reputation: 4944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losfrisco View Post
Here's what a light rail station 15 miles from downtown Los Angeles looks like:

https://www.google.com/maps/@34.0137...7i16384!8i8192
That's Santa Monica, kind of disingenuous to insinuate that is some far flung suburban rail station.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2022, 11:09 AM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,211 posts, read 3,293,492 times
Reputation: 4133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guineas View Post
That's Santa Monica.
Did I say it was in Los Angeles? Is "metro areas" part of the thread title? The third link is Long Beach, a "Metro Los Angeles Blue Line Station", just like the SaMo stop has "Los Angeles Metro" in the name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2022, 11:10 AM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
You sure love to ignore other transit types and cherry pick street views!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2022, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
2,991 posts, read 3,420,434 times
Reputation: 4944

Even before Covid, LA's transit ridership was in decline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2022, 02:01 PM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
Lots of data is out there to illustrate our points.

This one shows LA's long ridership decline, and Seattle as the one city with a long increase. https://www.thetransportpolitic.com/...banized-areas/

This one shows Seattle's UA at 71.2 unlinked trips per capita in 2019 vs. LA at 44.3. Page 34: https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uplo...-Fact-Book.pdf

CoStar shows that linked Wilshire intersection having affordable housing at a decent 0.45 parking ratio, but market rate buildings at 1.29 and (UC) at 1.91! Dense but massively car oriented. (No link)

Development isn't close. The Seattle market is building 9.7 msf of offices per CoStar, vs. 6.0 msf for their LA County, OC, and IE market breakouts combined. The Seattle area projects are almost universally transit-dependent with less parking than their LA equivalents. We're building vastly more office TOD. (No link)

Seattle's apartment construction market totals 22,733 units UC, the vast majority in TOD or downtown locations. The three LA markets total 37,000 combined, with 27,500 in LA County. Even just LA County has well under half of the Seattle metro's per capita volume. Break out King County (analogous to LA County) and the difference would be more stark...I took a quick crack at a hand-drawn map and got 21,668 apartments UC in a county less than 1/4 LA County's population.

Since most people don't have CoStar and it omits condos, permits are easier. The LA metro awarded permits for 18,085 new housing units in buildings of 5+ units in 2021. Seattle did 20,500. Go here and click on Dec 2021 for a full year. 2022 is playing to form, with 10,021 for Seattle and 9,091 for LA. https://www.census.gov/construction/bps/msamonthly.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2022, 04:10 PM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,211 posts, read 3,293,492 times
Reputation: 4133
Quote:
Originally Posted by grega94 View Post
That will probably be when east link extension opens next year.

Pre-pandemic data Q4 2019

City: daily ridership / miles / ridership per mile
Portland: 119,600 / 60 / 1,993
San Diego: 117,700 / 65 / 1,811
Seattle: 80,780 / 20.4 / 3,960

Pandemic Q4 2021

San Diego: 84,500 / 65 / 1,300
Seattle: 60,900 / 26.25 / 2,320
Portland: 51,100 / 60 / 852

Now let’s assume that next year the ridership per miles will be something in between 2019 and 2021 here is how things will look (sorry ahead of time if San Diego or Portland are also opening new lines next year)

Seattle: 125,600 / 40 / 3,140
San Diego: 101,108 / 65 / 1,556
Portland: 85,350 / 60 / 1,423

And then in 2024 we have the Federal Way and Lynwood extensions.

Seattle: 177,410 / 56.5 / 3,140

Which would give it the highest ridership of any light rail system in the US
Whether residents of Mercer Island and Redmond take an interest in light rail remains to be seen.

Keep in mind, while Seattle opens light rail that travels to 2000-4000 ppsm suburbs, Los Angeles will be opening a rapid transit subway that travels under 20,000-40,000 ppsm neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2022, 04:24 PM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,859,567 times
Reputation: 8666
They already take buses. Here are examples from the Census Dept. five-year commute stats, based entirely on buses for the Seattle area examples. These are places that will get rail by 2024:

Shoreline: 12.7%
Bellevue: 10.8%
Redmond: 10.2%
Lynnwood: 10.1%
Mercer Island: 9.6%
Federal Way: 7.5%

Pasadena: 5.9%
Long Beach: 5.3%
Compton: 4.8%
Santa Monica: 3.6%
Anaheim: 2.8%

I tried to pick high-use areas for LA...NOT cherrypicking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top