Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which major city has increased in relevance following a major population loss?
St. Louis 2 4.88%
New Orleans 4 9.76%
Milwaukee 1 2.44%
Cleveland 1 2.44%
Pittsburgh 13 31.71%
Chicago 11 26.83%
Cincinatti 0 0%
Baltimore 2 4.88%
Other 6 14.63%
Detroit 1 2.44%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2024, 08:11 PM
 
Location: Born + raised SF Bay; Tyler, TX now WNY
8,514 posts, read 4,759,184 times
Reputation: 8431

Advertisements

Chicago - it has really anchored the western Great Lakes by maintaining a strong metro area and world class amenities. It’s quite diversified, and maintains a food vernacular, good transit, and international prominence. Chicago has by far weathered the rust belt phenomenon the best and maintained or enhanced its stature over the last 50ish years. It’s still corrupt and city schools suck, with a crime problem. But no question in my mind, it’s floated above all the rest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old Yesterday, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee
1,738 posts, read 1,901,088 times
Reputation: 1594
Other- New York City due to the rise of Brooklyn, Even tho Estimates say NY is losing population Brooklyn's profile has risen in recent years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 11:09 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,013 posts, read 12,607,565 times
Reputation: 8930
10 years ago I would have said Baltimore by a mile. Not so much anymore. My gut said 'None' I picked Pittsburgh but barely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 01:21 PM
 
Location: New York City
9,381 posts, read 9,355,195 times
Reputation: 6515
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueRedTide View Post
Other- New York City due to the rise of Brooklyn, Even tho Estimates say NY is losing population Brooklyn's profile has risen in recent years
Eh. NYC had a blip due to Covid, and the loss was likely overstated. Many big cities had population blips from 2020-2023.

The cities listed in the poll have lost significant population (25%+) over a long period of time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 01:32 PM
 
3,769 posts, read 4,109,568 times
Reputation: 7794
The two cities that have gone down in population while remaining relevant are Detroit and Washington, DC, and neither of them are in the survey.

Detroit had over two million people in the city alone, now the city population gone down to about 600,000. Meanwhile, it is still a major industrial center, port and important trade center with many corporate headquarters remaining.

Washington, DC has lost population for decades, and only started gaining population in recent years. Yet it has become more relevant due to the increased regulation of our lives and the military industrial complex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Yesterday, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Central Mass
4,639 posts, read 4,906,264 times
Reputation: 5384
Boston's gone from the most important city to just another city to a hub of biotech.

it's several thousand percent bigger than when it was the most important city, but 20% smaller today than it was in 1950 when it was just another city.

IMHO Boston was the most important city in North America from 1630 to sometime in the first half of the 1700s. In the 1730s Philadelphia and Boston both had about 12,000 people. NYC only had ~8000 people in 1730.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 07:09 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,187 posts, read 22,765,736 times
Reputation: 17399
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
I doubt even the Pittsburgh voters think it's gained relevance since 1950. It's arguably gained in the past 10-15 years.
Pittsburgh's relevance bottomed out in the 1990s. Its foreign-born population percentage reached its nadir in 1990, versus 1970 for everyplace else, and it always seemed to be the last major metropolitan area get the upscale retail and restaurant chains that everybody in other major metropolitan areas took for granted. For example, Pittsburgh didn't even get a Nordstrom until 2008, which appears to have been a major oversight by Nordstrom, given how full its parking lot gets during the holidays and other special events, and the fact that they've opened a Nordstrom Rack not too far away on McKnight Road. Also, Pittsburgh was, by far, the largest metropolitan area in the U.S. to be left out of the Olympic Torch Relay in 1996. It was the only metropolitan area with at least 2,000,000 population that was left out, and the only others with at least 1,000,000 population that were left out were Virginia Beach/Norfolk and San Antonio, the latter of which was barely over 1,000,000 at the time. In terms of relevance, Pittsburgh had nowhere to go but up from the 1990s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old Today, 09:18 PM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,226 posts, read 3,307,915 times
Reputation: 4149
Quote:
Originally Posted by james777 View Post
The two cities that have gone down in population while remaining relevant are Detroit and Washington, DC, and neither of them are in the survey.

Detroit had over two million people in the city alone, now the city population gone down to about 600,000. Meanwhile, it is still a major industrial center, port and important trade center with many corporate headquarters remaining.

Washington, DC has lost population for decades, and only started gaining population in recent years. Yet it has become more relevant due to the increased regulation of our lives and the military industrial complex.
The question is has Detroit increased in relevance since it began losing population. I'd say no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top