Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
^^ No, I've been to NYC before. This was my 1st time back in over a year. And I said I liked some of the newer buildings. And you've posted a million pictures up already of buildings in NYC.
I still have my same opinion. I'm not alone in my view. You also failed to show a lot of the bad and downright depressing architecture of NYC.
You also failed to see that you never stated anything about the bad architecture in Chicago You seem like you are not a person who is into architecture. There is higher ratio of good buildings to bad buildings in NY than in chicago.
You also failed to see that you never stated anything about the bad architecture in Chicago You seem like you are not a person who is into architecture. There is higher ratio of good buildings to bad buildings in NY than in chicago.
You can't be serious? If that was the case, Chicago would have no chance of being in the same class as NYC as far as skylines go.
There are very few unnappealing buildings in Chicago's actual skyline. As you travel north on lakeshore there are some, but those aren't considered part of the actual skyline.
Probably been there more times than you. I almost lived in Chicago two years ago. Was there for a month two years back, things with work fell through. Would have stayed. Spent time in the Navy back in 93 too. Did my A school there. Know exactly what I am talking about. I also know that Chicago does a better hotdog than any other city in this country including NY. Most just don't know that yet. They can keep their deepdish though....As far as the loop.
I doubt it, Slick. Ive been going to Chicago on business since before you were ever in the Navy, and partially grew up in the Midwest. I was in the Navy too, and Waukeegan (sp?) is hardly the city. I'm guessing you took a couple of quick day trips in on Metra. I can see where you probably didn't ever really get the whole "feel" for the city.
You can't be serious? If that was the case, Chicago would have no chance of being in the same class as NYC as far as skylines go.
There are very few unnappealing buildings in Chicago's actual skyline. As you travel north on lakeshore there are some, but those aren't considered part of the actual skyline.
Chicago skyline is fairly new and unappealing to me. It lack architectural icon like Flatiron or Guggenheim museum. Bad achitecture in Chicago? Most of the city is an example of bad taste. As we all know Midwest was never famous for good taste, art or styling. There are few nice buidlings in Chicago including the one that was styled on Chrysler building but most are either unappealing postmodernist boxes like Sears, excuse me, Willis Tower or Hancock. New York is over a hundred years older then Chicago and it has its relfection in architecture.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.