Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-28-2010, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Chicago
4,745 posts, read 5,568,351 times
Reputation: 6009

Advertisements

I have not seen all of Brooklyn but it seemed like a cool place. Parts of it are quite gritty and ugly though. It's hard to compare a borough to a whole city. It's an apples-oranges comparison.

I'll take Chicago here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2010, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Detroit's eastside, downtown Detroit in near future!
2,053 posts, read 4,391,825 times
Reputation: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
pretty sure this is what detroit is doing.
wouldn't be fair though, south and west sides have some of the nicest parks in the city, they just are surrounded by ghetto and drug dealers. I'd be all for tearing down some of the urban decay but not the historic landmarks.
really??? hmmm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 07:08 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,496,781 times
Reputation: 5879
Quote:
Originally Posted by detroitlove View Post
really??? hmmm
yuh really

Detroit to Demolish 10,000 Abandoned Properties - WSJ.com


Even when the demolitions are complete, Detroit will still have a huge problem on its hands. The city has roughly 90,000 abandoned or vacant homes and residential lots, according to Data Driven Detroit, a nonprofit that tracks demographic data for the city.

Unless of course you have the insider information on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 08:56 PM
 
Location: New York, NY
70 posts, read 86,874 times
Reputation: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago South Sider View Post
I have not seen all of Brooklyn but it seemed like a cool place. Parts of it are quite gritty and ugly though. It's hard to compare a borough to a whole city. It's an apples-oranges comparison.

I'll take Chicago here.
Yes, because there are no ugly and gritty parts of Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 09:06 PM
 
301 posts, read 639,660 times
Reputation: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10013 View Post
Yes, because there are no ugly and gritty parts of Chicago.
Brooklyn has its part but it is still full of character what I like best about BK. Chicago is still cool city though and has character of its own
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 09:15 PM
 
Location: Chicago
4,745 posts, read 5,568,351 times
Reputation: 6009
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10013 View Post
Yes, because there are no ugly and gritty parts of Chicago.
Of course not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,382,016 times
Reputation: 1802
Any comparison of a major American city to any of the boroughs of New York is totally a laugh. Manhattan is what most people think New York City looks like and should look like. But Brooklyn and all the other boroughs are unremarkable and almost depressingly plain with blocks of very old 10-story tenement buildings, no trees or grass, garbage in the streets and a not very pleasant odor of too many people living too close to each other. The impression is of a eastern European country when they were under communism. Chicago's inner-city neighborhoods probably resemble Brooklyn but I know from photos that Chicago is far superior to anything Brooklyn can offer. Seriously!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 09:37 PM
 
1,694 posts, read 5,679,510 times
Reputation: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
Any comparison of a major American city to any of the boroughs of New York is totally a laugh. Manhattan is what most people think New York City looks like and should look like. But Brooklyn and all the other boroughs are unremarkable and almost depressingly plain with blocks of very old 10-story tenement buildings, no trees or grass, garbage in the streets and a not very pleasant odor of too many people living too close to each other. The impression is of a eastern European country when they were under communism. Chicago's inner-city neighborhoods probably resemble Brooklyn but I know from photos that Chicago is far superior to anything Brooklyn can offer. Seriously!
Just....no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 09:51 PM
 
2,598 posts, read 4,922,458 times
Reputation: 2275
You can find similarities in any large city (or borough) - that doesn't mean it's a fair comparison. Certainly you can compares blocks of city streets in Brooklyn to those in Queens, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, etc. What is Brooklyn's ranking in the GAWC? It's not there, because it's part of NYC. How does Brooklyn's skyline compare to Chicago's skyline? You can compare one block to another in any city, but you can't compare Brooklyn to Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 10:27 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
25 posts, read 36,430 times
Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
Any comparison of a major American city to any of the boroughs of New York is totally a laugh. Manhattan is what most people think New York City looks like and should look like. But Brooklyn and all the other boroughs are unremarkable and almost depressingly plain with blocks of very old 10-story tenement buildings, no trees or grass, garbage in the streets and a not very pleasant odor of too many people living too close to each other. The impression is of a eastern European country when they were under communism. Chicago's inner-city neighborhoods probably resemble Brooklyn but I know from photos that Chicago is far superior to anything Brooklyn can offer. Seriously!
You obviously don't know what you're talking about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top