Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-01-2011, 04:33 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
208 posts, read 411,381 times
Reputation: 314

Advertisements

I don't quite get how a city as powerful, rich, and large as LA has such a crappy skyline. Sorry folks, but it's true, LA's skyline comes up pitifully short compared to the skylines of some (objectively) less influential cities like Seattle, Pittsburgh, etc.

One legitimate excuse for this could be that maybe architects back in the day (You know, back when people were actually building cities) really feared or didn't even know HOW to build many high skyscrapers in areas that got frequent earthquakes. I mean, people in the 1930's constructing the Empire State Building didn't have to worry about making sure the building could survive a 6.5 on the Richter.

 
Old 08-01-2011, 06:05 AM
 
Location: Charlotte again!!
1,037 posts, read 2,046,494 times
Reputation: 533
NYC
Chicago
Seattle
Pittsburgh
Houston
 
Old 08-01-2011, 06:06 AM
 
Location: Charlotte again!!
1,037 posts, read 2,046,494 times
Reputation: 533
NYC
Chicago
Seattle
Pittsburgh
Houston
 
Old 08-01-2011, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,507 posts, read 26,285,643 times
Reputation: 13288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galactic View Post
I don't quite get how a city as powerful, rich, and large as LA has such a crappy skyline. Sorry folks, but it's true, LA's skyline comes up pitifully short compared to the skylines of some (objectively) less influential cities like Seattle, Pittsburgh, etc.

One legitimate excuse for this could be that maybe architects back in the day (You know, back when people were actually building cities) really feared or didn't even know HOW to build many high skyscrapers in areas that got frequent earthquakes. I mean, people in the 1930's constructing the Empire State Building didn't have to worry about making sure the building could survive a 6.5 on the Richter.
Agree, I hate LA's skyline.
 
Old 08-01-2011, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
1,580 posts, read 2,896,154 times
Reputation: 1717
1. New York: My personal favorite in the world, with great height and density and some really iconic buildings like Chrysler and ESB.

2. Chicago: Easily the second best in the US, and it looks especially cool from the water. Again, it has pretty much the total package of height, density and cool individual buildings.


3. Seattle: Not as big, but I like the mountain the in the background and the Space Needle is a cool "signature".

4. Miami (only recently): The individual buildings are not great, but I love the water and in the last 10-15 years it has really improved on density.
5. Tough one. I like the height and the buildings themselves in Atlanta (191 Peachtree, Suntrust, Westin Peachtree, BOA, 1080 Peachtree), but I really like the density and grouping of Pittsburgh (plus PPG is very cool). San Francisco is also nice, especially with the natural setting.
 
Old 08-01-2011, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Boston
59 posts, read 143,210 times
Reputation: 82
1. Chicago
2. NYC
3. Pittsburgh
4. Seattle
5. San Francisco

Honorable mentions go to Philly and Atlanta
 
Old 08-01-2011, 02:21 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,573,369 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galactic View Post
I don't quite get how a city as powerful, rich, and large as LA has such a crappy skyline. Sorry folks, but it's true, LA's skyline comes up pitifully short compared to the skylines of some (objectively) less influential cities like Seattle, Pittsburgh, etc.

One legitimate excuse for this could be that maybe architects back in the day (You know, back when people were actually building cities) really feared or didn't even know HOW to build many high skyscrapers in areas that got frequent earthquakes. I mean, people in the 1930's constructing the Empire State Building didn't have to worry about making sure the building could survive a 6.5 on the Richter.
Let me answer your question.....LA and SF need to withstand a 7.5 to 8 earthquakes not the puny 6.5 that you mentioned....
 
Old 08-01-2011, 02:24 PM
 
101 posts, read 114,107 times
Reputation: 44
I don't think anyone can argue NYC as undisputed #1 and Chicago as undisputed #2.

IMO, Miami, Philly, LA and SF are the best choices for the next four spots. The order is certainly debatable.
 
Old 08-01-2011, 03:31 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,285,888 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallas101 View Post
I don't think anyone can argue NYC as undisputed #1 and Chicago as undisputed #2.

IMO, Miami, Philly, LA and SF are the best choices for the next four spots. The order is certainly debatable.
That's why there is this thread and about 100 others with the same topic.
 
Old 08-01-2011, 03:49 PM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,111,073 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galactic View Post
I don't quite get how a city as powerful, rich, and large as LA has such a crappy skyline. Sorry folks, but it's true, LA's skyline comes up pitifully short compared to the skylines of some (objectively) less influential cities like Seattle, Pittsburgh, etc.

One legitimate excuse for this could be that maybe architects back in the day (You know, back when people were actually building cities) really feared or didn't even know HOW to build many high skyscrapers in areas that got frequent earthquakes. I mean, people in the 1930's constructing the Empire State Building didn't have to worry about making sure the building could survive a 6.5 on the Richter.

I dont get why Pittsburgh is always so over rated.


NY
Chi
SF
Miami
Seattle
LA
Houston
Dallas
Philly
Minneapolis
Honolulu*
Pittsburgh
San Diego

*under rated or often times forgotten....

Last edited by slo1318; 08-01-2011 at 04:57 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top