Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: ...
Sydney 21 33.87%
Los Angeles 41 66.13%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-09-2009, 06:00 PM
 
6,558 posts, read 12,048,122 times
Reputation: 5253

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAnative10 View Post
The city that Sydney reminds me the most of is Toronto (in the summer time of course). The urban cores of both cities remind me of each other. Circular Quay reminds me alot of Dundas Square and Yonge Street, the suburbs are very similar, and both cities have a very European flair.
The thing about Sydney that reminds me most of Toronto is Sydney's AMP Tower, which looks like Toronto's CN Tower. Their skylines look similar with their clean look to them.

On that subject, you can also match other Australian cities to Canadian cities:

Melbourne = Montreal (2nd largest cities, European influence)

Perth or Brisbane = Vancouver

Canberra = Ottawa (national capitals that are often overlooked)

Adelaide = Calgary

 
Old 12-09-2009, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in the universe
2,155 posts, read 4,581,318 times
Reputation: 1470
I think Sydney is prettier, but LA has more of the diversity for me.
 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
196 posts, read 614,316 times
Reputation: 157
I'm going to match up Australian cities to European cities, with almost no firsthand knowledge of either! Wheeeeee!

Sydney - London
Melbourne - Paris
Brisbane - Amsterdam
Adelaide - Naples
Perth - Barcelona
 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
196 posts, read 614,316 times
Reputation: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovely95 View Post
I think Sydney is prettier, but LA has more of the diversity for me.

Demographics of Sydney - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"At the 2006 census 39.4% of Sydney residents declared themselves to have been born overseas. The most common countries of birth outside Australia declared were the United Kingdom (4.3%), China (3.5%), New Zealand (2.0%), Vietnam (1.5%), India, The Philippines, Lebanon (about 1.3% each) and Italy (1.1%). Indigenous Australians were about 2% of all Sydney residents."

Whereas:

Demographics of Los Angeles - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"As of the 2000 US Census, the racial distribution in Los Angeles was 46.9% White American, 11.2% African American, 10.5% Asian American, 0.8% Native American, 0.2% Pacific Islander, 25.7% from other races, and 5.2% from two or more races. 46.5% of the population was Hispanic or Latino (of any race)."


Both cities are very diverse. I think Sydney is probably slightly more so.
 
Old 12-09-2009, 07:35 PM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,054,732 times
Reputation: 11862
^ Any stats for % of Los Angelenos born overseas (I don't know if Mexico would count, lol) - or rather then, outside the US?

Sydney is a very diverse city. There are parts of Sydney which resemble Beirut or Hong Kong more than Australia, and where 'white people' are definitely the minority.
 
Old 12-10-2009, 07:19 AM
 
Location: Somewhere in the universe
2,155 posts, read 4,581,318 times
Reputation: 1470
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFriendlyGod View Post
Demographics of Sydney - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"At the 2006 census 39.4% of Sydney residents declared themselves to have been born overseas. The most common countries of birth outside Australia declared were the United Kingdom (4.3%), China (3.5%), New Zealand (2.0%), Vietnam (1.5%), India, The Philippines, Lebanon (about 1.3% each) and Italy (1.1%). Indigenous Australians were about 2% of all Sydney residents."

Whereas:

Demographics of Los Angeles - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"As of the 2000 US Census, the racial distribution in Los Angeles was 46.9% White American, 11.2% African American, 10.5% Asian American, 0.8% Native American, 0.2% Pacific Islander, 25.7% from other races, and 5.2% from two or more races. 46.5% of the population was Hispanic or Latino (of any race)."


Both cities are very diverse. I think Sydney is probably slightly more so.
What I meant was that it had the diversity for me. African American culture mosty, but I accept diversity in general though and wouldn't mind living in the down under.
 
Old 12-10-2009, 09:35 AM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,349,098 times
Reputation: 2975
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovely95 View Post
What I meant was that it had the diversity for me. African American culture mosty
One culture does not diversity make.
 
Old 12-10-2009, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in the universe
2,155 posts, read 4,581,318 times
Reputation: 1470
And when did I say that? I am just saying that I am used to more of the type of diversity in L.A.(and the African American culture would be apart of that) not Sydney. You can't tell me that the demographics are exactly the same. L.A. has all different types of people including African Americans, Mexicans, etc., what I would be more used to. What's wrong with going with what I'd be more used to? Maybe I worded it wrong or something, but I didn't mean it was more diverse than Sydney, just a different diversity more of the kind I'd be used to. It's like you can't mention diversity on CityData without getting chewed up because it has to mean that you are putting another city down or something.

Last edited by Lovely95; 12-10-2009 at 05:30 PM..
 
Old 12-10-2009, 06:06 PM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,054,732 times
Reputation: 11862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovely95 View Post
And when did I say that? I am just saying that I am used to more of the type of diversity in L.A.(and the African American culture would be apart of that) not Sydney. You can't tell me that the demographics are exactly the same. L.A. has all different types of people including African Americans, Mexicans, etc., what I would be more used to. What's wrong with going with what I'd be more used to? Maybe I worded it wrong or something, but I didn't mean it was more diverse than Sydney, just a different diversity more of the kind I'd be used to. It's like you can't mention diversity on CityData without getting chewed up because it has to mean that you are putting another city down or something.
You should have made that clear. To say 'more of the diversity for me' it's hard to know exactly what you are meaning. Since I too think Sydney is just as diverse as LA.
 
Old 12-10-2009, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in the universe
2,155 posts, read 4,581,318 times
Reputation: 1470
Yeah, I was probably rushing around and didn't have time or think to explain. I wouldn't mind living in Sydney though, just too far away and I'm sure there'd be more of a culture shock. I think the beaches are better in general.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top