Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which cali city is more cosmo?
Los Angeles 98 54.14%
San Francisco 83 45.86%
Voters: 181. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-17-2009, 10:34 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,656,174 times
Reputation: 13635

Advertisements

I agree with Krudmonk and Coldwine have said. While SF is more sophisticated and prettier I don't think its more cosmopolitan than LA. LA is huge and more diverse, its just not the prettiest looking city on the outside.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-17-2009, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Mile high city
795 posts, read 2,410,525 times
Reputation: 266
I don't think this is even close. SF is far more cosmopolitan
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 11:25 AM
 
3,674 posts, read 8,662,137 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
I agree with Krudmonk and Coldwine have said. While SF is more sophisticated and prettier I don't think its more cosmopolitan than LA. LA is huge and more diverse, its just not the prettiest looking city on the outside.
Yeah. Cosmopolitanism is a lot more dirty, chaotic and grungy than the well-lacquered image San Francisco tries to air.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 11:40 AM
rah
 
Location: Oakland
3,314 posts, read 9,238,078 times
Reputation: 2538
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldwine View Post
Yeah. Cosmopolitanism is a lot more dirty, chaotic and grungy than the well-lacquered image San Francisco tries to air.
SF tries to air that image but it doesn't really mean it's true. SF has had a higher crime rate than LA for a few years now (and was actually neck and neck with LA's crime rate back in the early/mid 90's), and there's no shortage of graffiti, litter, old crumbling roads, even in some of the nice/touristy areas.

As far as diversity, LA probably does have SF beat. If we're talking the entire Bay Area though, I'd say they're about equal all things considered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 01:27 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,515,553 times
Reputation: 5884
Hrrmm...

Apparently some people on here misunderstand what cosmopolitan means and implying it means sophisticated.

Not even going to get into it...

LA is much more cosmopolitan... SF is pretty much super white collar white, and asian.

When posting I always refer to city proper, unless otherwise stated.

That being said, the terms cosmopolitan, sophisticated, and international get misconstrued on this board ALL the time and would paint a very different image of cities than they actually are for somebody that has never been there. I knew this was going to be the case in this thread also as soon as I saw the OP use the slang "cosmo."

Personally I think this board should have a sticky with what certain terms mean before posting on here.

/rant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 02:15 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,350,211 times
Reputation: 2975
It's the magazine and cocktail which have skewed people's interpretation of the word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 03:21 PM
 
9,526 posts, read 30,477,668 times
Reputation: 6435
LA is the epicenter of culture and commerce for the western united states... which used to be SF.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles-213.323.310.818/San Diego-619.858.760
705 posts, read 3,298,304 times
Reputation: 445
Los Angeles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2009, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Irvine,Oc,Ca
1,423 posts, read 4,687,009 times
Reputation: 689
Los Angeles Though not saying Sf isn't cosmo at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2009, 02:01 AM
 
1,669 posts, read 4,241,768 times
Reputation: 978
A city doesn't need to be full of people from all over the world to be cosmopolitan, Tokyo is very cosmopolitan and it's pretty much exclusively populated by ethnic Japanese.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top