Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
why? which one do u prefer? is the weather that bad in the whole bay area? is life in LA that awful??? how are most of the people (in general I mean; I know everone is deifferent^^!) in each city? Which city has the best nightlife (is the other's bad?)?
well, I have no more questions I think^^lol!
well, i'm sorry if this question has been asked dozens/hundreds/thousands of times but I really don't have time to check other posts right now sorry!!^^ so thanks for ur help^^ have a good day!
I like LA better because it has better museums, more shopping options (Beverly Hills+South Coast Plaza is divine, only NYC can compare), more movie theater and other theater choices, more authentic Chinese food. SF has a beautiful skyline and better public transportation, but, I am just the kind of the larger the better person. Having more options is always good for me, and I don't mind driving that much. I'd like to go to movies and museums and shopping and restaurants in my spare time so these are my only concerns. The density thing, only works for me if it makes the city feel larger. SF feels larger than Detroit (not actually larger), but definitely still a lot smaller than LA, in terms of everything. And I don't think I want to state again LA's metro density is larger than SF, even than NYC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nick1212
why? which one do u prefer? is the weather that bad in the whole bay area? is life in LA that awful??? how are most of the people (in general I mean; I know everone is deifferent^^!) in each city? Which city has the best nightlife (is the other's bad?)?
well, I have no more questions I think^^lol!
Last edited by fashionguy; 06-20-2009 at 01:16 PM..
LA is more exciting and vital and of course the weather is 100 times better (unless you are one of those who gets the vapors if it's over 70 and thinks having cold clammy clothing adhering to your body is romantic). On the other SF is more relaxed and enjoyable at a slow pace. You can walk just about anywhere in SF and pretty much everything in LA has to be driven to. LA has more cultural offerings, the ones available in SF are more sophisticated. LA is up-to-the-minute, SF has the force of history behind it. Really is a very personal choice.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
