Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Title is pretty much self explanitory. I'd like to see what people think the census estimations for the following cities and metro areas are going to be come April 1, 2010. Feel free to follow my template or make your own.
1. New York City
City: 8,450,000
Metro: 19,900,000
2. Los Angeles
City: 4,050,000
Metro: L.A is a confusing one. Urban L.A has around 12 million+ residents while "Metro" L.A has over 17 million. Going by Urban L.A, I'll say 13,200,000.
3. Chicago
City: 2,900,000
Metro: 10,100,000+easily.
4. Houston
City: 2,400,000
Metro: 6,200,000
5. Philadelphia
City: 1,300,000
Metro: 6,100,000
6. Boston
City: 620,000
Metro: 7,900,000 (CSA)
Metro D/FW: 6,400,000
Country as a whole: 330,000,000
Add any others you think should be here
Is there a better way for projections other than linearly applying previous growth rate? I don't think so. It is definite to be inaccurate but that is what a projection is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spire
Title is pretty much self explanitory. I'd like to see what people think the census estimations for the following cities and metro areas are going to be come April 1, 2010. Feel free to follow my template or make your own.
1. New York City
City: 8,450,000
Metro: 19,900,000
2. Los Angeles
City: 4,050,000
Metro: L.A is a confusing one. Urban L.A has around 12 million+ residents while "Metro" L.A has over 17 million. Going by Urban L.A, I'll say 13,200,000.
3. Chicago
City: 2,900,000
Metro: 10,100,000+easily.
4. Houston
City: 2,400,000
Metro: 6,200,000
5. Philadelphia
City: 1,300,000
Metro: 6,100,000
6. Boston
City: 620,000
Metro: 7,900,000 (CSA)
Metro D/FW: 6,400,000
Country as a whole: 330,000,000
Add any others you think should be here
We won't know the 2010 census until April of 2011 though. I think DFW will pass 6.4 million by that time and Houston will come up just a little short of 6 million. I also do not believe Chicago will pass 10 million as well. But they will be around 9.9 million.
Title is pretty much self explanitory. I'd like to see what people think the census estimations for the following cities and metro areas are going to be come April 1, 2010. Feel free to follow my template or make your own.
1. New York City
City: 8,450,000
Metro: 19,900,000
2. Los Angeles
City: 4,050,000
Metro: L.A is a confusing one. Urban L.A has around 12 million+ residents while "Metro" L.A has over 17 million. Going by Urban L.A, I'll say 13,200,000.
3. Chicago
City: 2,900,000
Metro: 10,100,000+easily.
4. Houston
City: 2,400,000
Metro: 6,200,000
5. Philadelphia
City: 1,300,000
Metro: 6,100,000
6. Boston
City: 620,000
Metro: 7,900,000 (CSA)
Metro D/FW: 6,400,000
Country as a whole: 330,000,000
Add any others you think should be here
are these the only cities in the United States? what happened to the estimation in other cities?
Title is pretty much self explanitory. I'd like to see what people think the census estimations for the following cities and metro areas are going to be come April 1, 2010. Feel free to follow my template or make your own.
1. New York City
City: 8,450,000
Metro: 19,900,000
2. Los Angeles
City: 4,050,000 Metro: L.A is a confusing one. Urban L.A has around 12 million+ residents while "Metro" L.A has over 17 million. Going by Urban L.A, I'll say 13,200,000.
3. Chicago
City: 2,900,000
Metro: 10,100,000+easily.
4. Houston
City: 2,400,000
Metro: 6,200,000
5. Philadelphia
City: 1,300,000
Metro: 6,100,000
6. Boston
City: 620,000
Metro: 7,900,000 (CSA)
Metro D/FW: 6,400,000
Country as a whole: 330,000,000
Add any others you think should be here
Not sure what is confusing about LA...There is the MSA which is about 12mil and the CSA which is about 17, no different than Baltimore/Washington or Boston/Providence or SF/SJ
I don't think Chicagoland will pass 10mil, and I would predict about 30k loss for Chicago city limits.
Right. Every city has the MSA and CSA (except for a few like Miami doesn't have a CSA). There is no confusion about LA there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prelude91
Not sure what is confusing about LA...There is the MSA which is about 12mil and the CSA which is about 17, no different than Baltimore/Washington or Boston/Providence or SF/SJ
I don't think Chicagoland will pass 10mil, and I would predict about 30k loss for Chicago city limits.
Title is pretty much self explanitory. I'd like to see what people think the census estimations for the following cities and metro areas are going to be come April 1, 2010. Feel free to follow my template or make your own.
1. New York City
City: 8,450,000
Metro: 19,900,000
2. Los Angeles
City: 4,050,000
Metro: L.A is a confusing one. Urban L.A has around 12 million+ residents while "Metro" L.A has over 17 million. Going by Urban L.A, I'll say 13,200,000.
3. Chicago
City: 2,900,000
Metro: 10,100,000+easily.
4. Houston
City: 2,400,000
Metro: 6,200,000
5. Philadelphia
City: 1,300,000
Metro: 6,100,000
6. Boston
City: 620,000
Metro: 7,900,000 (CSA)
Metro D/FW: 6,400,000
Country as a whole: 330,000,000
Add any others you think should be here
If you're going to use CSA for one (which I agree you should), use CSA for all. Don't be mixing and matching. NY CSA is already over 22 million.
use CSA for all. Don't be mixing and matching. NY CSA is already over 22 million.
Nah................ It's at least a couple million less than that. Ask a native NY'er. NJ does not count.
Unless it's convenient & they want to win the "metro area" contest. Then the
Garden State counts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.