U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: I would rather live in the...
Rust Belt 182 44.61%
Sun Belt 226 55.39%
Voters: 408. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-04-2009, 04:39 PM
 
2,757 posts, read 5,521,771 times
Reputation: 1123

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by timeofseasons View Post
If sun belt include west coast, then ofcourse the sun belt.
It does include the West (parts of it anyway).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-04-2009, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Midwest
1,005 posts, read 2,723,737 times
Reputation: 253
^

Yeah if the west is included, than easily sun belt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Midwest
1,005 posts, read 2,723,737 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Summers View Post
I'd take the Sunbelt easily: Pittsburgh, Buffalo, Syracuse, Milwaukee, Detroit, Toledo, Cleveland, etc against ATL, Miami, LA, New Orleans, Houston, San Diego...Keep going?OK, vs Dallas, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Tampa, Orlando,OKC, and San Antonio. I can live in Pittsburgh and Milwaukee easily, but forget the rest of the rustbelt towns. The Sunbelt has more to offer.
Atlanta and Okalahoma are not sun belt cities at all.

When speaking of the southeast there are no sunbelt cities above the lower Arkansas boarder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:01 PM
 
2,757 posts, read 5,521,771 times
Reputation: 1123
Quote:
Originally Posted by timeofseasons View Post
Atlanta and Okalahoma are not sun belt cities at all.

When speaking of the southeast there are no sunbelt cities above the lower Arkansas boarder.
Not trying to be facetious but that's new to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 05:51 PM
 
7,848 posts, read 20,435,371 times
Reputation: 2848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Summers View Post
Not trying to be facetious but that's new to me.
That's what I was thinking...I mean, I hate the term "Sun Belt" and I wish Atlanta wasn't part of it, but I'm afraid it is. If the Sun Belt was only the areas below Arkansas, it would be the Gulf Coast only.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 07:46 PM
 
Location: Closer than you think!
2,767 posts, read 4,412,405 times
Reputation: 2855
I'd take the sunbelt. I don't know if it's just me but the word "rustbelt" doesn't sound too appealing plus the sunbelt has cities with better opportunities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Midwest
1,005 posts, read 2,723,737 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeaconJ View Post
That's what I was thinking...I mean, I hate the term "Sun Belt" and I wish Atlanta wasn't part of it, but I'm afraid it is. If the Sun Belt was only the areas below Arkansas, it would be the Gulf Coast only.
When speaking of the southeast, only cities below Arkansas lower boarder are considered part of the sunbelt, Dalles far northern suburbs are barely within this boarder.

Last edited by timeofseasons; 07-04-2009 at 08:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,407 posts, read 32,592,620 times
Reputation: 11935
Quote:
Originally Posted by timeofseasons View Post
When speaking of the southeast, only cities below Arkansas lower boarder are considered part of the sunbelt.
Since when?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Sarasota, Florida
15,395 posts, read 22,103,453 times
Reputation: 11128
Quote:
Originally Posted by loillon892 View Post
It seems that there is a lot of discussion here about regional preferences, but I couldn't find this poll. Not "North vs. South", but more specifically, Rust Belt (i.e. Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania) versus Sun Belt (i.e., California, Arizona, Nevada, Florida.) Some "northern" states aren't in the Rust Belt (i.e., Vermont) just as some Southern states (i.e., Kentucky or West Virginia) aren't in the Sun Belt.

Which of those two broad regions do you prefer, and why?

Having lived in both...my vote is with the Sun Belt. Rust Belt cities and states had absolutely no appeal to me at all, and I was never happy living in that region.
I have lived in both too but it's the rust belt for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2009, 08:45 PM
 
Location: Midwest
1,005 posts, read 2,723,737 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Since when?
This has always been the boarder ( cities below lower Arkansas boarder, or cities below upper Louisana boarder)

Oh yeah Charleston, South Carolina is also a example of a city thats barely below the boarder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top