Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city is the fourth most important in the nation?
San Francisco 118 25.00%
Washington D.C. 217 45.97%
Boston 63 13.35%
Houston 74 15.68%
Voters: 472. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2009, 09:59 AM
 
Location: where my heart is
5,643 posts, read 9,668,771 times
Reputation: 1661

Advertisements

Our nation's capital has to be the most important in the country. What goes on there will affect each and every city in the country.

Now if you ask which we "prefer" of those listed, my choice would be Boston with SF a close second.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2009, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Lower East Side, Milwaukee, WI
2,943 posts, read 5,077,561 times
Reputation: 1113
Doesn't the Dallas-Ft. Worth Metroplex have like 1 million more residents than Greater Houston?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 11:32 AM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,527,896 times
Reputation: 5884
top 4 as a poster said are dc, la, chicago, nyc in no particular order. behind that in the 5-8 range are boston/sf/houston/philly, again in no particular order ... then you have a drop off and get cities like atl, dallas, miami, seattle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,228,339 times
Reputation: 7428
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjacobeclark View Post
Doesn't the Dallas-Ft. Worth Metroplex have like 1 million more residents than Greater Houston?
Size dosen't always determine importance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,466,386 times
Reputation: 4201
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
top 4 as a poster said are dc, la, chicago, nyc in no particular order. behind that in the 5-8 range are boston/sf/houston/philly, again in no particular order ... then you have a drop off and get cities like atl, dallas, miami, seattle.
Agreed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,228,339 times
Reputation: 7428
I love how your all ignoring San Jose; Which is the reasons why San Francisco is even in this debate. You take out San Jose, than San Francisco falls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,466,386 times
Reputation: 4201
I've always paired the two together. When I think of San Francisco, I think "Bay Area", which San Jose is apart of. San Jose just doesn't get as much press as SF.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 12:28 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,527,896 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by jluke65780 View Post
I love how your all ignoring San Jose; Which is the reasons why San Francisco is even in this debate. You take out San Jose, than San Francisco falls.
san jose would be insignificant w/o stanford, menlo park, sand hill road, etc. more like it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 12:44 PM
 
2,957 posts, read 6,477,893 times
Reputation: 1419
Quote:
Originally Posted by jluke65780 View Post
I love how your all ignoring San Jose; Which is the reasons why San Francisco is even in this debate. You take out San Jose, than San Francisco falls.
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
san jose would be insignificant w/o stanford, menlo park, sand hill road, etc. more like it.
Agreed, but I'd also throw in Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara and Cupertino in there as well. San Jose is far from what makes up Silicon Valley by itself, its just the largest city there. But the surrounding cities are just as important.

As for SF, taking away SJ would make this region less important in tech jobs and innovations, and things of that nature. But that's only a fraction of what there is out here and there are plenty more areas that are very important like Oakland, Berkeley, Marin County, Napa, Sonoma, etc. SF proper is more like the central downtown for the Bay Area. It may be the most key component of this region, but it is only that and all the rest surrounding it deserves to be included when looking at it. If SF were taken away, this region would fall significantly as well.

The weirdest thing to me is when people try to split SF and SJ into two different metros when the Bay is obviously one contiguous metro region, with SJ making up the southern portion. Like it or not, we're all interconnected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2009, 01:18 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,527,896 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman650 View Post
Agreed, but I'd also throw in Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara and Cupertino in there as well. San Jose is far from what makes up Silicon Valley by itself, its just the largest city there. But the surrounding cities are just as important.

As for SF, taking away SJ would make this region less important in tech jobs and innovations, and things of that nature. But that's only a fraction of what there is out here and there are plenty more areas that are very important like Oakland, Berkeley, Marin County, Napa, Sonoma, etc. SF proper is more like the central downtown for the Bay Area. It may be the most key component of this region, but it is only that and all the rest surrounding it deserves to be included when looking at it. If SF were taken away, this region would fall significantly as well.

The weirdest thing to me is when people try to split SF and SJ into two different metros when the Bay is obviously one contiguous metro region, with SJ making up the southern portion. Like it or not, we're all interconnected.
Yeah the others are definitely, but the list is pretty long.
Definitely...there is really no break around the bay going down both sides... Would it make a difference if cities like SF and Boston just started annexing places like Chicago and Houston making new political boundaries? Not really...still significant even though the city limits are much smaller.
SF is about 48square miles, Houston is 600... now which feels like you are in the bigger city... :/ I bet most people would say SF.
It is not as if these smaller city limit places have a Berlin wall type structure around them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top