Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What are the best cities to meet single Black/African-American females, ages 21-30?
Boston 10 5.10%
Providence 5 2.55%
NYC 49 25.00%
Philadelphia 26 13.27%
Wilmington, DE 5 2.55%
Baltimore 24 12.24%
Washington, D.C. 93 47.45%
Richmond 7 3.57%
Hampton Roads, VA 11 5.61%
Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill 16 8.16%
Charlotte, NC 32 16.33%
Winston-Salem-Greensboro 5 2.55%
Atlanta 120 61.22%
Charleston, SC 6 3.06%
Savannah, GA 6 3.06%
Nashville 6 3.06%
Tampa-St. Pete 5 2.55%
Orlando 3 1.53%
Miami-Ft. Lauderdale 13 6.63%
New Orleans 22 11.22%
Houston 46 23.47%
Dallas 29 14.80%
Memphis 17 8.67%
Chicago 38 19.39%
St. Louis 14 7.14%
Cleveland 10 5.10%
Columbus, OH 7 3.57%
Detroit 19 9.69%
Milwaukee 6 3.06%
Other (please specify) 10 5.10%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 196. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Old 02-26-2024, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,095 posts, read 34,696,690 times
Reputation: 15093

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wpipkins2 View Post
I would argue that the DC metro area has the fittest women. This is based on lifestyle and income. LA has some beautiful black women for sure but not in concentrated numbers like DC and the metro area.
You could argue that but the data doesn't bear it out.

Like I said, the entire U.S. is in denial about weight. Most people lash out against BMI but completely ignore that waistline circumference, upper arm circumference and sagittal abdominal diameter have also increased dramatically in only 30 years. Everyone on the internet claims to be 225 lb of solid muscle with 11% body fat yet the CDC says the median waist circumference for a man is around 40 inches. Only about 25% of American men have a waist smaller than 36 inches. In 1994, it was about 40-45%.

We also know that COVID-19 mortality is positively correlated with obesity.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-33093-3

So it has very real world consequences.

Last edited by BajanYankee; 02-26-2024 at 04:24 PM..
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2024, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Miami-Dade
137 posts, read 50,037 times
Reputation: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
Yeah, only that's not the case. We know this is not the case because because 41.4% of the women in that age group have a BMI of at least 30. So no, it's not the case that you have hundreds of thousands in the ATL metro hovering around 25.1 lol.
You haven't established that unless you can say where exactly that other 58% falls on the spectrum.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2024, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,095 posts, read 34,696,690 times
Reputation: 15093
California has produced a ton of gorgeous Black women. Here are some who grew up in the state.

Gabrielle Union (moved to the Bay at 8)
Lauren London (grew up in LA)
Malika Andrews (grew up in Oakland)
Misty Copeland (grew up in San Pedro)
Ananda Lewis (grew up in LA)
Christina Milian (born in NJ; moved to MD, then LA at 13)
Lark Voorhies (moved to LA at 2)
Paula Patton (grew up in LA)
Jhene Aiko (grew up in LA)
Yara Shahidi (moved to LA as a child)
Meagan Good (grew up in LA)
Maia Campbell (born in MD; grew up in Ladera Heights)
Nia Long (born in NY, moved to LA at 7)
Zoe Kravitz (grew up in LA)
Zendaya Coleman (grew up in Oakland)
Bianca Lawson (grew up in LA)
Chloe and Halle Bailey (moved to LA from ATL)
Tessa Thompson (grew up in LA)
Jennifer Freeman (grew up in LA)
Amber Stevens-West (grew up in LA)

Last edited by BajanYankee; 02-26-2024 at 06:22 PM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2024, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,095 posts, read 34,696,690 times
Reputation: 15093
NY can go toe-to-toe with LA at the top end though.

Kerry Washington (Bronx)
Susan Kelechi-Watson (Brooklyn)
Amel Larrieux (Manhattan)
Tatyana Ali (Long Island)
Zazie Beetz (Harlem)
Stacey Dash (Harlem)
Jurnee Smollett (born in Manhattan; bi-coastal)
Rochelle Aytes (Harlem)
Robinne Lee (Mt. Vernon)
Shari Headley (Queens)
Sanaa Lathan (Harlem)
Vanessa Williams (Westchester)
Lena Horne (Brooklyn)
Diahann Carroll (Bronx)
Essence Atkins (Brooklyn)
Samantha Logan (Manhattan)
Alicia Keys (Manhattan)

Last edited by BajanYankee; 02-26-2024 at 06:01 PM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2024, 06:09 AM
 
Location: Houston(Screwston),TX
4,379 posts, read 4,620,046 times
Reputation: 6704
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
OP's poll is trash because there's no option for LA, which is easily the best of the lot IMHO. You can come across women like this in Inglewood or Leimert Park and they're actually accessible and down to earth because so many successful Black men there are not trying to date Black women. As a result, a lot of the Black women there will have this strange inferiority complex where they might be a 7.5 in reality but think of themselves as a 6. In any other city they would be getting 4-5X the attention.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27U5PyeUN2w
Imma keep it real the last time I was in LA didn't see a ton of Black women in comparison to cities like Atlanta, Houston, DC, NYC, DAL or even Philly. And the Black women I did see frequently they were fit but they were with White Men and it wasn't a ton of them at that.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2024, 07:06 AM
 
Location: The Greatest city on Earth: City of Atlanta Proper
8,485 posts, read 14,993,141 times
Reputation: 7333
Quote:
Originally Posted by godrestores View Post
There is no way this is fully accurate. What metrics are you using and from what source?

Plus the problem with this measure is that having only +/-.1 BMI can have you considered "normal" or "overweight/underweight". So you're discounting thousands of people who's body types are likely very similar to those that fall within your definition of fit.
Right, and what is "normal" anyway...especially in this context. For example, prior to being married I preferred women of a "curvacious" nature whom would be "obese" on the bmi scale.

BMI is a joke and it always have been, but sadly people insist on using despite the fact that it wasn't the intended use for that information when it was developed. Now can you use it as a way to set a personal goal? Absolutely, but BMI isn't straightforward way to tell the health of someoone.

That is of course if you believe a 179 pound 6 foot guy who never works out and eats like a bird is at the same fitness level of another 6 foot tall 230 pound NFL quarterback. One of those people are "unhealthy" according to just BMI, and it's not the skinny guy that eats like crap.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2024, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,095 posts, read 34,696,690 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by waronxmas View Post
Right, and what is "normal" anyway...especially in this context. For example, prior to being married I preferred women of a "curvacious" nature whom would be "obese" on the bmi scale.

BMI is a joke and it always have been, but sadly people insist on using despite the fact that it wasn't the intended use for that information when it was developed. Now can you use it as a way to set a personal goal? Absolutely, but BMI isn't straightforward way to tell the health of someoone.

That is of course if you believe a 179 pound 6 foot guy who never works out and eats like a bird is at the same fitness level of another 6 foot tall 230 pound NFL quarterback. One of those people are "unhealthy" according to just BMI, and it's not the skinny guy that eats like crap.
These BMI critiques are insufferable.

BMI is only one anthropemetric data point tracked by the CDC. The CDC also collects data related to central obesity, arm/leg circumference and abdominal diameter.

People go on the attack against BMI because it can be dismissed as European junk science even though it is strongly correlated with coronary disease, hypertension and Covid mortality. But if the attack is simply based on it being inaccurate as far as appearance goes, then we can look to waist circumference and abdominal diameter instead, which are also strongly correlated with BMI.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2024, 09:26 AM
 
3,144 posts, read 2,046,970 times
Reputation: 4891
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
These BMI critiques are insufferable.

BMI is only one anthropemetric data point tracked by the CDC. The CDC also collects data related to central obesity, arm/leg circumference and abdominal diameter.

People go on the attack against BMI because it can be dismissed as European junk science even though it is strongly correlated with coronary disease, hypertension and Covid mortality. But if the attack is simply based on it being inaccurate as far as appearance goes, then we can look to waist circumference and abdominal diameter instead, which are also strongly correlated with BMI.
Agreed. BMI has very strong correlation with overall health. It's not perfect, but a lot of the criticism towards it is based in denialism - people don't want to accept that they are often above the ideal level so it's dismissed as junk by many.

But the stats are what the stats are - high BMIs, regardless of physical appearance, are associated with higher mortality due to a variety of connected causes.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2024, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,095 posts, read 34,696,690 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Clutch View Post
Agreed. BMI has very strong correlation with overall health. It's not perfect, but a lot of the criticism towards it is based in denialism - people don't want to accept that they are often above the ideal level so it's dismissed as junk by many.

But the stats are what the stats are - high BMIs, regardless of physical appearance, are associated with higher mortality due to a variety of connected causes.
Yeah. Our standards on the whole have become very warped over the years.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2024, 10:10 AM
 
4,177 posts, read 2,956,710 times
Reputation: 3092
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
You could argue that but the data doesn't bear it out.

Like I said, the entire U.S. is in denial about weight. Most people lash out against BMI but completely ignore that waistline circumference, upper arm circumference and sagittal abdominal diameter have also increased dramatically in only 30 years. Everyone on the internet claims to be 225 lb of solid muscle with 11% body fat yet the CDC says the median waist circumference for a man is around 40 inches. Only about 25% of American men have a waist smaller than 36 inches. In 1994, it was about 40-45%.

We also know that COVID-19 mortality is positively correlated with obesity.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-33093-3

So it has very real world consequences.
I am not in denial at all. You can simply look at family photo albums to see the differences over generations. I am a 48 year old black man. I am 6'3" @ 180lbs. My waste size is 34 and this is the biggest I've ever been. I am blessed and this blessing was bestowed upon my children. Both children (male and female) have zero body fat and are built in true human form.

I have family in LA and DC. The fit lifestyle is more pronounced in DC and I have never seen this in LA. The real LA.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top