Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Even if you took away the setting and location, the sheer density of SF's skyline is remarkable. It has far more tall buildings than Dallas in a much smaller space. Dallas' skyline is shinier--thats really its only advantage.
Approaching SF from the Bay Bridge or from highway 280, the skyline makes you feel like you are driving into a *Big City*. Driving towards Dallas you feel like youre approaching some bizarre outpost with tall buildings.
Even if you took away the setting and location, the sheer density of SF's skyline is remarkable. It has far more tall buildings than Dallas in a much smaller space. Dallas' skyline is shinier--thats really its only advantage.
Approaching SF from the Bay Bridge or from highway 280, the skyline makes you feel like you are driving into a *Big City*. Driving towards Dallas you feel like youre approaching some bizarre outpost with tall buildings.
Wow....I'm a little shocked SF is leading by so much. I picked Dallas. SF has never impressed me much and lacks uniqueness. The hills only help so much.
Wow....I'm a little shocked SF is leading by so much. I picked Dallas. SF has never impressed me much and lacks uniqueness. The hills only help so much.
Exactly! The only reason SF is winning is because of the scenery! If SF was in the same place Dallas was SF would not be winning!
I think in scenery SF is the lead, but skyline wise its Dallas.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.