Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-25-2010, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Bentonville, AR
1,134 posts, read 3,191,352 times
Reputation: 919

Advertisements

This isn't a "MOST URBAN" thread. I just want to know about cities that you would describe as a good urban environment that may be unknown. Portland and NY come to mind as obvious answers. Anyone out there live in a good area we may not think of as urban?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2010, 06:07 PM
 
Location: Cleveland bound with MPLS in the rear-view
5,509 posts, read 11,880,875 times
Reputation: 2501
Milwaukee?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2010, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Ventura County, Ca
137 posts, read 703,012 times
Reputation: 104
San Francisco
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Orlando, FL
1,988 posts, read 7,150,500 times
Reputation: 656
I think usually the densest most walkable cities are the most urban.
I also think cities with a lot of unique neighborhoods with individual personalities make a great urban atmosphere. I think NY, SF, DC, Philly, Baltimore, Chicago, Boston are some great ones. There are a lot of cities with great atmospheres but they are kind of sprawly and have restaurants in strip malls and are less walkable. They are great cities in their own right but cities like LA, Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Miami, Charlotte are all kind of suburban and urban mixed and less urban overall IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 08:48 AM
 
10,624 posts, read 26,739,553 times
Reputation: 6776
I think LA is at the top of the list when it comes to misunderstood cities. I've far too often seen it described as "suburban," but I bet most of the city is nothing what like what most Americans think of as suburban. It's not walkable in the sense that there's one single compact urban core that you can walk in one burst, but that's not true of most cities.

I know people are going to hate this, but I would never place NYC and Portland together in the same sentence when talking about urban cities. Portland is nice and it is urban, but it's nothing like LA. It's not even that dense. A nice city, don't get me wrong, but I wouldn't put it at the pinnacle of "urban" cities, either.

I guess it also means by what one means by urban. A city doesn't have to look like Manhattan to be truly urban, walkable, and where I can easily live without a car. Many cities fit that criteria, beyond the obvious choices like the biggest cities.

Pittsburgh was a city that surprised me. I didn't know much about modern Pittsburgh before visiting, but it seems like an exciting, vibrant city that was urban and very livable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Orlando, FL
1,988 posts, read 7,150,500 times
Reputation: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by uptown_urbanist View Post
I think LA is at the top of the list when it comes to misunderstood cities. I've far too often seen it described as "suburban," but I bet most of the city is nothing what like what most Americans think of as suburban. It's not walkable in the sense that there's one single compact urban core that you can walk in one burst, but that's not true of most cities.

I know people are going to hate this, but I would never place NYC and Portland together in the same sentence when talking about urban cities. Portland is nice and it is urban, but it's nothing like LA. It's not even that dense. A nice city, don't get me wrong, but I wouldn't put it at the pinnacle of "urban" cities, either.

I guess it also means by what one means by urban. A city doesn't have to look like Manhattan to be truly urban, walkable, and where I can easily live without a car. Many cities fit that criteria, beyond the obvious choices like the biggest cities.

Pittsburgh was a city that surprised me. I didn't know much about modern Pittsburgh before visiting, but it seems like an exciting, vibrant city that was urban and very livable.
I am not a big fan or Portland and I don't see it as all that urban. They have done a great job with mass transit and walkability. There is a good restaurant scene, but that is about it IMO. LA has walkable areas and definite neighborhoods but I do not see it as urban. It is in a middle category if possible like Atlanta, Houston, and Dallas that are really large and have walkable areas but overall are not and are more sprawl oriented.

I almost put Pittsburgh in my list but I have less experience with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 12:57 PM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,783,641 times
Reputation: 3774
I hate when people put Atlanta, Houston, and Dallas in the same category. Houston is the most urban out of the 3! NOT ATLANTA!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 01:05 PM
 
221 posts, read 798,300 times
Reputation: 169
I think downtown Portland is remarkably urban for how small its metro is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 01:15 PM
 
2,106 posts, read 6,632,896 times
Reputation: 963
Quote:
Originally Posted by erin3465 View Post
I think downtown Portland is remarkably urban for how small its metro is.
I'd hope the downtown is Urban.... it's the urban core of the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 01:25 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,153 posts, read 39,418,669 times
Reputation: 21252
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M Bulldawg View Post
I hate when people put Atlanta, Houston, and Dallas in the same category. Houston is the most urban out of the 3! NOT ATLANTA!
How so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top