Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Out of sympathy, I voted Atlanta. But honestly, SF is probably one the most urban cities in the country. NYC, Boston, SF-Oakland, Chicago(due to its CBD), and DC probably standout even among the larger cities as being urban among urbans. However, this does not diminsh how truly Atlanta is. It is sunbelt urban, built around multiple nuclei of development, based automotive transportation.
For some reason a lot of people use the term urban as a synonym for black (I hate that by the way) thus you get terms like "Urban music" and "Urban fashion". In that case then Atlanta and it's not even close.
But if talking about density and walkability then san francisco obviously.
Sympathy only because this was a stupid comparison... That's why i said this thread is going to bring put all the Atlanta bashers.. I think everyone knows it's SF
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
