Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-05-2010, 06:00 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,935,335 times
Reputation: 7976

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vermolas View Post

my zip 19103 got a 100 out of 100

Guess that is good

 
Old 05-05-2010, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Northridge, Los Angeles, CA
2,684 posts, read 7,385,389 times
Reputation: 2411
The crayon names AREN'T NEARLY as weird as how Ben and Jerry gets the name of the flavors for their ice cream. Seriously...why don't they just start naming their flavors after types of metamorphic rocks?

To answer your REAL question, here's what walkscore has to say
America's Most Walkable Neighborhoods - Walkability Rankings of the Largest 40 U.S. Cities

CityScoreMost Walkable Neighborhoods
1San Francisco86 (47 sq. miles)
2New York83 (304 sq. miles)
3Boston79 (48 sq. miles)
4Chicago76 (227 sq. miles)
5Philadelphia74 (127 sq. miles)
6Seattle72 (83 sq. miles)
7Washington D.C.70 (61 sq. miles)
8Long Beach 69 (50 sq. miles)
9Los Angeles67 (469 sq. miles)
10Portland 66 (145 sq. miles)
*Note: Size of the city is only LAND SIZE, not total municipal size which includes water

To be fair to NYC though, San Francisco gets such a high score because its only 47 square miles, while NYC is 304 square miles, much of which is in parts of Staten Island and Queens that aren't walkable friendly. To still maintain a that high of a score DESPITE its somewhat suburban areas (and trust me, I lived on Staten Island to know that it wasn't very walkable) is extremely impressive.


If it were limited to Manhattan, then I would think it would be more walkable than SF since there is not only no place on Manhattan that isn't within walking distance of the subway, but has a much higher density than SF. However, Manhattan is also only 22.96 square miles, so to make it truly fair SF would be more limited by half its size (roughly the size of the Sunset/Outer Richmond/Hunters Point).

San Francisco is fun to walk though. I personally love all those hills. It makes life exciting Force you to be fit. It just sucks that Muni is horrible.
 
Old 05-05-2010, 06:07 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,935,335 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lifeshadower View Post
The crayon names AREN'T NEARLY as weird as how Ben and Jerry gets the name of the flavors for their ice cream. Seriously...why don't they just start naming their flavors after types of metamorphic rocks?

To answer your REAL question, here's what walkscore has to say
America's Most Walkable Neighborhoods - Walkability Rankings of the Largest 40 U.S. Cities

CityScoreMost Walkable Neighborhoods
1San Francisco86 (47 sq. miles)
2New York83 (304 sq. miles)
3Boston79 (48 sq. miles)
4Chicago76 (227 sq. miles)
5Philadelphia74 (127 sq. miles)
6Seattle72 (83 sq. miles)
7Washington D.C.70 (61 sq. miles)
8Long Beach 69 (50 sq. miles)
9Los Angeles67 (469 sq. miles)
10Portland 66 (145 sq. miles)
*Note: Size of the city is only LAND SIZE, not total municipal size which includes water

To be fair to NYC though, San Francisco gets such a high score because its only 47 square miles, while NYC is 304 square miles, much of which is in parts of Staten Island and Queens that aren't walkable friendly. To still maintain a that high of a score DESPITE its somewhat suburban areas (and trust me, I lived on Staten Island to know that it wasn't very walkable) is extremely impressive.


If it were limited to Manhattan, then I would think it would be more walkable than SF since there is not only no place on Manhattan that isn't within walking distance of the subway, but has a much higher density than SF. However, Manhattan is also only 22.96 square miles, so to make it truly fair SF would be more limited by half its size (roughly the size of the Sunset/Outer Richmond/Hunters Point).

San Francisco is fun to walk though. I personally love all those hills. It makes life exciting Force you to be fit. It just sucks that Muni is horrible.

I agree and if you exclude NE Philly (almost suburban) the Philly scores is in the 80s overall - all the downtown cores you listed are nearly a 100
 
Old 05-05-2010, 08:16 PM
 
Location: Boston, MA
289 posts, read 1,025,648 times
Reputation: 134
Really, Long Beach? Last time I checked stats Long Beach was a fifth Port. Sea Port isnt reall good for walking.
 
Old 05-05-2010, 08:21 PM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,068,476 times
Reputation: 11862
What was the purpose of the crayon-related tagline? Even though there have been tons of threads on this very topic, people will still reply...
 
Old 05-05-2010, 08:22 PM
 
Location: southern california
61,288 posts, read 87,431,754 times
Reputation: 55562
its a french word.
 
Old 05-05-2010, 10:28 PM
 
Location: West Cobb County, GA (Atlanta metro)
9,191 posts, read 33,889,276 times
Reputation: 5311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vermolas View Post
OK, Now that I got your attention, heres the reall question:

Most Walkable Cities?
Here's the real answer:

1) The topic has been discussed before more than once, so please do a search and add to existing threads.

2) Please never start a topic with a subject line that has nothing to do with the real subject to lure people in, then say, " Now that I got your attention, heres the reall question"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top