Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2017, 06:46 PM
 
182 posts, read 224,233 times
Reputation: 194

Advertisements

any updates?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2017, 09:47 PM
Status: ""...I wrote it down, now I follow thru..."" (set 10 days ago)
 
Location: North Raleigh x North Sacramento
5,748 posts, read 5,506,702 times
Reputation: 7021
The Five Tier South, 2017

Tier 1
Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, Miami

Tier 2
Charlotte, Tampa, Orlando

Tier 3
Austin, Nashville, New Orleans

Tier 4
Richmond, Louisville, Raleigh, San Antonio

Tier 5
Birmingham, Jacksonville, Oklahoma City, Memphis

Room for variation here, but I think there is a clear seperation between Tiers 2 and 3. I think there is a very thin gap between Tier 3 and 4. I put New Orleans in Tier 3 but there is debate that some of the top-end Tier 4 cities could be Tier 3 if New Orleans is. It definitely isn't Tier 2...

Very small gaps between Tiers 3/4/5...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 10:05 PM
 
151 posts, read 237,000 times
Reputation: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
I'm sorry. I disagree with Tampa in tier 1 and I disagree with the tier 1a thing. Also, if you're going to put Northern VA in there, you might as well put DC in tie 1 and call it a Southern city. Tier 1a is another way of saying that they are near the same level as the tier 1 cities and I don't see that.

Tier 1 in no order
Houston
Atlanta
Dallas
Miami
DC (if you're going to include NOVA)

There really isn't anything close to these cities
Tier 2
New Orleans
Charlotte
San Antonio
Fort Worth
Tampa St-Pete
Orlando

Tier 3
Austin (tho very close to tier 2)
Jacksonville
Memphis
Nashville
Raleigh (also very close to tier 2)
Tidewater/Hampton Roads area
and a few more.
How is San Antonio a Tier 2 city but Austin is not a Tier 2? Ask most any Texan and they will say that the three most economic influential and important cities for the state are DFW, Austin, and Houston. San Antonio is sort of like the black sheep of the bunch and is only 200k more people but the GDP per capita of Austin is much higher, and now tourism is larger in Austin than San Antonio. Austin is also a MAJOR tech city with an amazing skyline, world-class music festivals, and the circuit of America! San Antonio really can't compete. Also Fort Worth stand alone away from Dallas is misleading IMO. Sure it has a major economy, but that is driven because of Dallas being next door. And if we are just looking at Tarrant County as the FW economy, much of the eastern portion are the wealthier Dallas bedroom communities and aren't necessarily tied to the Fort Worth economy (I'm looking at you Colleyville, Grapevine, Southlake).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX and wherever planes fly
1,907 posts, read 3,207,749 times
Reputation: 2128
**For 2017**

Tier 1 in no order
Houston
Atlanta
Dallas
Miami

DC (Is not Southern nor is it Northern, mid-atlantic and that is that) Delete from list.

There really isn't anything close to these cities (Agreed) Miami's saving grace is tourism otherwise...

Tier 2

New Orleans
Charlotte
San Antonio
Fort Worth (Indeed It's own city and rightfully in tier 2)
Tampa St-Pete
Orlando

Tier 3
Austin (tho very close to tier 2) No sports teams, and infrastructure are holding them back form tier 2
Raleigh-Durham (also very close to tier 2) (agreed) (All the right pieces now that light rail has been funded, just needs time, also the most educated of all of the cities pound for pound)
Nashville (also close to tier 2)
Jacksonville
Memphis
Tidewater/Hampton Roads
Richmond

Tier 4

Charleston (Gold star for charm and uniqueness)
Savannah (Gold star for charm uniqueness)
Oklahoma City
Birmingham
Tulsa
Winston-Salem
Little Rock
Huntsville


I think that's all of them...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
992 posts, read 865,532 times
Reputation: 618
Forth worth should be grouped with Dallas, and Dallas is not really tier one if it doesn't include Ft. Worth.
DC is thoroughly Northern, and you can argue that Richmond and Hampton Roads are too.

Other than that, I agree with Taynxtlvl
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 12:45 PM
 
34 posts, read 70,363 times
Reputation: 43
How can you have Winston Salem without having Greensboro? And Huntsville shouldn't even Be on the list without having louisville, Greenville, Asheville and Chattanooga.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 01:49 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,007,684 times
Reputation: 14759
Metro tiers are based on objective data and growth trends of PSAs. Tier 1 is over 5M. Tier 2 is between 3 and 5M. Tier 3 is between 2 and 3 million. Tier 4 is between 1 and 2M.
Populations for now are projected based on 2015 PSA population estimates plus 1-1/2 years of annual growth based on the average 2010-15 growth rates. Variations of green indicate growth rates with the darker greens indicating those with the fastest growth rates and the lighter greens indicating slower growing metros. Metros that are basically stagnant are indicated by grey. I am determining stagnant to mean .25% growth rate or less per annum. Interestingly, the largest metros also tend to be the faster growing with the most rapid growth rates of any group are the ones between 2 and 3 million. By absolute numbers, the big boys keep piling on the largest numbers.
Florida has two fast growing upstarts on its west coast and are anomalies in terms of growth rate compared to the other tier 4 metros.

Tier 1
Dallas-Fort Worth: 7,714,000 - 1.85% (~growth per annum)
Houston: 7,083,000 - 2.2%
Miami: 6,801,000 - 1.46%
Atlanta: 6,501,327 - 1.42%

Tier 2
Orlando: 3,225,000 - 2.02%
Tampa-St Pete: 3,033,000 - 1.28%

Tier 3
Charlotte: 2,647,000 - 1.61%
San Antonio: 2,458,249 - 2.06%
Raleigh-Durham: 2,179,000 - 1.95%
Austin: 2,091,000 - 2.97%
Nashville: 2,001,000 - 1.68%

Tier 4
Hampton Roads: 1,842,000 - .52%
Greensboro-Winston Salem: 1,658,000 - .63%
Jacksonville: 1,604,000 - 1.3%
Louisville: 1,518,000 - .58%
New Orleans: 1,517,000 - 1.05%
Greenville-Spartanburg: 1,446,000 - .88%
Memphis: 1,376,000 - .25%
Birmingham: 1,324,000 - .24%
Richmond: 1,290,000 - .98%
Knoxville: 1,115,000 - .56%
Cape Coral-Ft Myers: 1,096,000 - 2.3%
Sarasota: 1,001,000 - 1.65%

Last edited by rnc2mbfl; 02-23-2017 at 02:08 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 02:34 PM
 
Location: charlotte
614 posts, read 523,895 times
Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by EndersDrift View Post
Interesting but it is 6 years old.

And this is all opinion especially since we didn't select any cities like 10 from each state or something to sort. We also didn't set any sort of criteria. Some seem to be doing it on population some on economic output some on global importance. I put Tampa up at the top because its a great metro of over 4 million people. I just can't see putting a metro of 4 million people in the same grouping as metros of around 2 million people. If I left in a Tier 1a thing I would've put Tampa there but I didn't see the need to have a sub tier for 1 city.

I think people often overlook just how big Tampa Bay Area is but Tampa Bay Area is over 4 million. New Orleans for example is just over 1 million. Orlando is just over 2 million as is Charlotte.
You should check your data again. tampa's msa population is 2.9 in 2015 and Charlotte's was 2.4 million. I agree that New orleans is only slightly over 1 million and is growing slowly. It can only compare as a tourist destination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,500 posts, read 33,311,608 times
Reputation: 12109
Quote:
Originally Posted by Western Urbanite View Post
Forth worth should be grouped with Dallas, and Dallas is not really tier one if it doesn't include Ft. Worth.
DC is thoroughly Northern, and you can argue that Richmond and Hampton Roads are too.

Other than that, I agree with Taynxtlvl
Nah. Richmond and Hampton Roads are Southern.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2017, 04:32 PM
 
307 posts, read 326,463 times
Reputation: 286
There is no way Fort Worth should be in tier 2. Only someone from Dallas or Fort Worth would think that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top