Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2015, 03:53 PM
 
6,892 posts, read 8,267,952 times
Reputation: 3877

Advertisements

SACRAMENTO already resembles a mixture of Portland and Austin, by 10 years even more so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2015, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
1,912 posts, read 2,089,144 times
Reputation: 4048
Minneapolis will look like Minneapolis, but 75K-100K people larger. Saint Paul will be where Minneapolis is today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 09:48 AM
 
2,639 posts, read 1,993,613 times
Reputation: 1988
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwguy2 View Post

Seattle is an interesting case study. The skyline is growing probably better than anywhere in the US right now, and adjacent Bellevue, (not in Seattle), is huge. So, I would go out on a limb and say Seattle could resemble current day Chicago, without the supertalls.

when this question was posed, I first thought of Seattle as an eventual cousin.
Downtown Bellevue seems like a smaller version of downtown Seattle.

With all the construction in downtown Seattle, it has reminded me of Manhattan. But yes, Chicago seems like an apt comparison.

Last edited by Tim Randal Walker; 05-26-2015 at 10:12 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 10:20 AM
 
2,639 posts, read 1,993,613 times
Reputation: 1988
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post

Houston, probably LA both 10-20 years because of it's city layout.
LA expanded as a streetcar suburb, and has been evolving into its own beast. Perhaps Houston will somewhat resemble LA, but evolve into its own style?

Last edited by Tim Randal Walker; 05-26-2015 at 10:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 10:22 AM
 
22 posts, read 36,633 times
Reputation: 29
I hope Kansas City starts to resemble Austin/Denver. Wish it luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 11:41 AM
 
2,823 posts, read 4,491,160 times
Reputation: 1804
Quote:
Originally Posted by metroboi View Post
Here is my take on Raleigh:

-Raleigh in ten years: Charlotte
-Raleigh in 20 years: Denver

As for Charlotte:

The Queen city will resemble Denver in 10 years and Seattle in 20 years

What current city will your city resemble in 10 years and 20 years?

Things to consider: Economy, population, urbanity, nightlife, art scene, etc.
I hope this will never happen, Raleigh/Durham and Charlotte have enough transplants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Louisville
5,294 posts, read 6,059,103 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by desert_sw_77 View Post
lol, the springs is reaching for the stars.
lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 05:19 PM
 
2,324 posts, read 2,906,235 times
Reputation: 1785
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
I doubt it.

LA has serious land constraints that force very high density while Atlanta is wide open.

But the demographics will be similar in 10-20

Pittsburgh ==== Seattle
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 05:24 PM
 
Location: USA
2,753 posts, read 3,311,159 times
Reputation: 2192
Hartford is a tough one...

10 years -> Richmond
20 years -> Milwaukee?

It's tough to say because Hartford's only 18 square miles yet roughly 130,000 live there in a metropolitan area of 1.2 million people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 05:50 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,738,907 times
Reputation: 17398
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaBurgh View Post
Pittsburgh ==== Seattle
Interestingly, I actually read an urban studies blogger a couple of years ago who said that the vibe he got in Pittsburgh at the time was similar to the vibe he got in Seattle during the 1980s, after the city's economic doldrums of the 1970s, but before its emergence as a premier American city during the 1990s. If that's true, then I guess the big difference would be that Seattle had a bad decade before things began to change, whereas Pittsburgh had a bad three decades before things began to change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top