Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > College Football
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-05-2019, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,081,036 times
Reputation: 7099

Advertisements

In college, the hash marks are much further apart, and the kickers aren't near as good as those in the NFL.

I would love to see a rule change in college football that if a team is lined up to kick a field goal and the defense calls a time out, the kicking team would be permitted to have the refs move the ball along the line of scrimmage to any point between the hash marks. It wouldn't cost any more time in the game, since it could be done during the timeout. and it might actually speed up the game if it keeps them from burning a time out in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-06-2019, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma
17,772 posts, read 13,665,953 times
Reputation: 17806
That's an interesting idea. Yesterday for the first time I saw a team use all three timeouts to "ice" the kicker at the end of the game. They ended up making all of them 30 second time outs.

I think there should be a rule that if you are going to call a time out on a FG it has to be taken before or at the time the referee signals the ball ready for play. That would keep this nonsense of calling time outs right before the snap from occurring over and over again where the kicker kicks it after the play has been blown dead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2019, 11:50 PM
 
Location: Trumbull/Danbury
9,753 posts, read 7,460,573 times
Reputation: 4111
I thought there was a rule where the defending team couldn't take back-to-back timeouts on a field goal attempt otherwise they'd get a delay of game penalty. Did they get rid of that??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2019, 09:18 AM
 
Location: King County, WA
15,821 posts, read 6,527,022 times
Reputation: 13310
I think Football has too many rules. Why add more?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2019, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Oklahoma
17,772 posts, read 13,665,953 times
Reputation: 17806
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7express View Post
I thought there was a rule where the defending team couldn't take back-to-back timeouts on a field goal attempt otherwise they'd get a delay of game penalty. Did they get rid of that??
Never heard of that being a rule in the first place. As I said, it was Northwestern that took three time outs in a row at the end of the Nebraska game to ice the kicker but they were all made into 30 second time outs. Usually you get two full time outs and one 30 second time out per half.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 10:42 AM
 
17,563 posts, read 15,226,764 times
Reputation: 22875
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7express View Post
I thought there was a rule where the defending team couldn't take back-to-back timeouts on a field goal attempt otherwise they'd get a delay of game penalty. Did they get rid of that??

That is certainly a rule in the NFL.. I don't know about college.


In the NFL, back to back timeouts to ice a kicker earns a 15 yard unsportsmanlike penalty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 12:21 PM
 
Location: South of Cakalaki
5,716 posts, read 4,682,005 times
Reputation: 5163
College allows to time outs to be taken whenever, including all in a row.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2019, 02:38 PM
 
17,563 posts, read 15,226,764 times
Reputation: 22875
Has anyone ever looked at the odds when icing? How many were missed on the first attempt vs made on the second and vice versa?


Has always seemed to me that icing doesn't work.

I would think that the second attempt would be better because rather than giving the kicker time to stew, it gives him a chance to think it through, settle down and be calmer on the attempt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2019, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,081,036 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Labonte18 View Post
Has anyone ever looked at the odds when icing? How many were missed on the first attempt vs made on the second and vice versa?


Has always seemed to me that icing doesn't work.

I would think that the second attempt would be better because rather than giving the kicker time to stew, it gives him a chance to think it through, settle down and be calmer on the attempt.
Hard to say, because most of the time they don't kick the first time, when timeout is called.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2019, 12:20 PM
 
18,560 posts, read 7,362,427 times
Reputation: 11372
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie gein View Post
That's an interesting idea. Yesterday for the first time I saw a team use all three timeouts to "ice" the kicker at the end of the game. They ended up making all of them 30 second time outs.

I think there should be a rule that if you are going to call a time out on a FG it has to be taken before or at the time the referee signals the ball ready for play. That would keep this nonsense of calling time outs right before the snap from occurring over and over again where the kicker kicks it after the play has been blown dead.
I agree they need to do something to stop that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > College Football

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top