Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Colleges and Universities
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2013, 02:00 PM
 
20,793 posts, read 61,338,491 times
Reputation: 10695

Advertisements

I have no issues with these top football players (or basketball or whatever) taking a soft business degree to go along with their football career. It makes sense that they have some background in dealing with large salaries, etc. Not all of these players are going to make it big in the pro's but even at the base NFL salary, that is a large salary for someone right out of college.

I guess I don't see the problem...it's better than these kids ending up on the street or welfare....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2013, 05:24 AM
 
11,642 posts, read 23,925,141 times
Reputation: 12274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
I don't know why you find it offensive. The brain-injury problem in the NFL is well known. I don't know any retired pro athletes. I know some college football players from D1 schools who didn't make it.
The brain injury problem in the NFL is not as prevalent as you suggest. The link below suggests a 3.7% rate of CTE among former NFL players. Elevated risk for illness is not a 100% guarantee that they will be "probably brain-damaged by age 40."

Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: A Potential Late Effect of Sport-Related Concussive and Subconcussive Head Trauma

I think it is easy to write an entire group of people off as "probably brain-damaged" when you do not know any. I know quite a few retired NFL players. They are all pretty normal people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 05:43 AM
 
11,642 posts, read 23,925,141 times
Reputation: 12274
Quote:
Originally Posted by MN-Born-n-Raised View Post
I know almost a dozen. Each and everyone has done very well for themselves after retirement to various levels. These were "old school" pro athletes though and before the massive pay checks. All of the ones I know are not household names outside of MN. But inside of state of MN, they are known to people who follow hockey and football.
Most of the guys I know are coaches or parents at my kids school. I know a handful from youth football. We live close to the Dolphins practice facility and many current/former players live in this area. Most of the former NFL players that I know are very concerned about the education their kids get and send their kids to private school. I don't know why it is hard for some people to understand that while there are some stupid athletes, there are also some stupid non athletes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 06:29 AM
 
20,793 posts, read 61,338,491 times
Reputation: 10695
Quote:
Originally Posted by Momma_bear View Post
Most of the guys I know are coaches or parents at my kids school. I know a handful from youth football. We live close to the Dolphins practice facility and many current/former players live in this area. Most of the former NFL players that I know are very concerned about the education their kids get and send their kids to private school. I don't know why it is hard for some people to understand that while there are some stupid athletes, there are also some stupid non athletes.
I would say that the vast majority of athletes from all sports are above average intelligence..but like everything else, you only hear about the worst cases. The average GPA on my daughter's team is about a 3.8--all STEM majors. Other teams we have been involved with have had similar results. The top students at our high school are ALL athletes. Most college athletes are top students as well. Look at most successful business people, doctors, etc. and they were almost ALL athletes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 08:25 AM
 
2,991 posts, read 4,292,553 times
Reputation: 4270
Most of the negative comments here concern division-1 football and basketball, not minor sports, not athletes in general, and not lower-division schools. I remember when South Carolina, for example, left the ACC because too many of their football and basketball athletes at that time couldn't meet the conference requirements for SAT scores, which were (if memory serves, which it may not) about 750 combined.

For more recent information, see http://www.usnews.com/education/blog...-in-sat-scores
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,854,411 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfgal View Post
I would say that the vast majority of athletes from all sports are above average intelligence..but like everything else, you only hear about the worst cases. The average GPA on my daughter's team is about a 3.8--all STEM majors. Other teams we have been involved with have had similar results. The top students at our high school are ALL athletes. Most college athletes are top students as well. Look at most successful business people, doctors, etc. and they were almost ALL athletes.
I posted earlier about how female athletes have higher grades than males. Not too surprising, since females in general get higher grades. It hasn't been that long since my own kids were in HS, and I wouldn't say all the top students were athletes, nor would I say all the athletes were top students. My own experience in college, and that of my daughter who went to a D1 college, are otherwise than the above regarding college students, as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 03:07 PM
 
5,644 posts, read 13,236,029 times
Reputation: 14170
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfgal View Post
Well, passing the MCAT is required for reputable medical schools so they pretty much go hand in hand...
No they don't go hand in hand....

The changes in the MCAT don't require any new required classes to pass the exam...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 04:37 PM
 
11,642 posts, read 23,925,141 times
Reputation: 12274
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedevilz View Post
No they don't go hand in hand....

The changes in the MCAT don't require any new required classes to pass the exam...
But if the test is testing new material students would need those subjects to do well on the exam. Most students would get that background by taking undergrad classes in those subjects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 05:38 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,854,411 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Momma_bear View Post
The brain injury problem in the NFL is not as prevalent as you suggest. The link below suggests a 3.7% rate of CTE among former NFL players. Elevated risk for illness is not a 100% guarantee that they will be "probably brain-damaged by age 40."

Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: A Potential Late Effect of Sport-Related Concussive and Subconcussive Head Trauma

I think it is easy to write an entire group of people off as "probably brain-damaged" when you do not know any. I know quite a few retired NFL players. They are all pretty normal people.
Interesting that they could come up with such a precise figure in living individuals, since CTE can only be diagnosed at autopsy.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/809902

Actually, this is what your link says:

Quote:
To date, there have been no randomized neuropathological studies of CTE in deceased athletes, and as such, there is a selection bias in the cases that have come to autopsy. If one considers the prevalence in deceased professional American football players who died between February 2008 and June 2010, there were 321 known player deaths [14] and the brains of 12 of the 321 underwent postmortem neuropathological examination at Boston University Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy (BU CSTE). All 12 examined neuropathologically showed evidence of CTE, suggesting an estimated lifetime prevalence rate of at least 3.7%. If one assumes that all deceased players who did not come to autopsy did not have CTE, and that the amount of head trauma in professional football has remained fairly constant over the past 5 decades, a prevalence rate of 3.7% would result.
Do no harm: Retired NFL players endure a lifetime of hurt
Quote:
Nearly 90% of retired football players report aches and pains on a daily basis, and 91% of these attribute their problems to football. Also, 90% report receiving concussions, with 60% reporting two or more. 2/3 who had concussions said they had recurring problems from their concussions.

Last edited by toobusytoday; 09-18-2013 at 06:49 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 06:09 PM
 
11,642 posts, read 23,925,141 times
Reputation: 12274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Interesting that they could come up with such a precise figure in living individuals, since CTE can only be diagnosed at autopsy.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/809902

Actually, this is what your link says:

To date, there have been no randomized neuropathological studies of CTE in deceased athletes, and as such, there is a selection bias in the cases that have come to autopsy. If one considers the prevalence in deceased professional American football players who died between February 2008 and June 2010, there were 321 known player deaths [14] and the brains of 12 of the 321 underwent postmortem neuropathological examination at Boston University Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy (BU CSTE). All 12 examined neuropathologically showed evidence of CTE, suggesting an estimated lifetime prevalence rate of at least 3.7%. If one assumes that all deceased players who did not come to autopsy did not have CTE, and that the amount of head trauma in professional football has remained fairly constant over the past 5 decades, a prevalence rate of 3.7% would result.
There is still no reason to believe that the VAST MAJORITY of former football players are brain damaged is there? There is higher risk of brain damage but are talking about 3.7% (I don't have a better number) and 11%, not the VAST MAJORITY.

Last edited by toobusytoday; 09-18-2013 at 06:47 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Education > Colleges and Universities
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top