Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-18-2010, 05:58 PM
 
26,212 posts, read 49,044,521 times
Reputation: 31781

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulysses61 View Post
.... Colorado does not tax pensions....
Actually, for retirees, COLO exempts the first $20k of income; for my wife and I we get $40k deducted from our COLO taxable income, which, at 4.9% amounts to $1960.00 per year.
__________________
- Please follow our TOS.
- Any Questions about City-Data? See the FAQ list.
- Want some detailed instructions on using the site? See The Guide for plain english explanation.
- Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
- Thank you and enjoy City-Data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-18-2010, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
3,158 posts, read 6,123,489 times
Reputation: 5619
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzlover View Post
So, if Colorado would "wise-up" and embrace a "no-growth" policy, it's citizens would ultimately wind up better off, not worse. How? Simply by having government actually QUIT spending taxpayer money doing some things, to wit:

1. Eliminate all government funding for ADDITIONAL road expansion. If developers need new road, street, or highway construction because of their development, make them pay for it--all of it, not the taxpaying public.

2. Eliminate all government funding for any new diversion of water supplies from any source to municipal use. Again, if developers want to secure water supplies for their development, then make the developers pay for it.

3. Eliminate government funding of any public services for illegal immigrants--no exceptions.

Those three steps alone would greatly help assure that any population growth that does occur is required to pay for itself and not become a burden upon existing residents. What a concept.
While I agree that new development does not pay for itself, the steps that you advocate would also have consequences. You can decide for yourself if these consequences are positive or negative.

Such steps would make new development prohibitively expensive, but it would not necessarily decrease the influx of immigrants to this state.

1. The density of the cities would have to increase, as we put more people into the area already developed. This would be accomplished in a couple of ways:

This would increase the likelihood of filtering - the process by which larger single family homes are turned into multi-family apartments. This has happened in many areas near downtown, and the practice would spread further as the need for homes increases.

Many single family areas will be torn down in order to build multiple family housing. It will be cheaper for builders to hook into existing lines.

Higher demand for existing housing will increase housing prices for all. Soon, we will be paying California-type prices for houses. In fact, by limiting growth, we will not turn into Los Angeles, but rather we will become like San Francisco, a city whose growth is not limited by statute, but by geography.

2. Transportation will become increasingly harder as more density means more cars in the same space. More density will make light rail a better option for commuters. It will probably need to be expanded (I don't know why RTD hasn't decided to put a line down Hampden, but that is another story), but more density will make light rail more cost efficient.

3. Because suburbs are seen as desirable places for professionals to live, the transformation of the suburbs into something that is more urban would be detrimental to any effort to lure businesses to our area because of quality of life concerns (real or perceived).

In the business of luring corporations, we will start to lose out to places like Salt Lake City, Boise, and Albuquerque over quality of life concerns.

The population of the United States continues to grow, and I don't believe that closing our state to outsiders will achieve the results that you desire. Promoting smart growth is probably a good compromise between shutting down population growth and allowing unfettered population growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2011, 09:47 PM
 
1 posts, read 1,871 times
Reputation: 14
I can now say that different people, different opinion. I live in CO for almost 8 years now and most of the comments that I had read are not true. Colorado is beautiful, no doubt, one of the most beautiful places I had ever been, beautiful blue skies, great mountains and of course, world class skiing and snowboarding, gorgeous. But as some of you said, same weather? I don't think so, cheaper? craziness, and illegal immigration as bad or worse than CA. I guess its all depends where you live in CO. I live in Breckenridge (summit county), the county outrageously expensive, affordable housing is $300,000, winters are brutal (585 inches of snow last year) average of 400+, and every day we see more and more illegals moving to the county. Yeah, I love this place and you can call me crazy but I am thinking about moving to SoCal. Growing 3 kids is not easy in the mountains of CO, is boring here. There is so much fishing, hiking, mountain biking and skiing, you can do, after a while, it gets old. -32 degrees days in winter? no, thank you, 8 month of winter with no spring or fall? I don't think so. I guess what I am trying to say is that if you want to live in the beautiful, clear air, rivers and beauty of CO you have to suffer the snow, the cold temperatures, long winters and also the illegal immigration. Me, myself, miss the ocean.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 03:52 PM
 
529 posts, read 1,547,861 times
Reputation: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raf Suarez View Post
I can now say that different people, different opinion. I live in CO for almost 8 years now and most of the comments that I had read are not true. Colorado is beautiful, no doubt, one of the most beautiful places I had ever been, beautiful blue skies, great mountains and of course, world class skiing and snowboarding, gorgeous. But as some of you said, same weather? I don't think so, cheaper? craziness, and illegal immigration as bad or worse than CA. I guess its all depends where you live in CO. I live in Breckenridge (summit county), the county outrageously expensive, affordable housing is $300,000, winters are brutal (585 inches of snow last year) average of 400+, and every day we see more and more illegals moving to the county. Yeah, I love this place and you can call me crazy but I am thinking about moving to SoCal. Growing 3 kids is not easy in the mountains of CO, is boring here. There is so much fishing, hiking, mountain biking and skiing, you can do, after a while, it gets old. -32 degrees days in winter? no, thank you, 8 month of winter with no spring or fall? I don't think so. I guess what I am trying to say is that if you want to live in the beautiful, clear air, rivers and beauty of CO you have to suffer the snow, the cold temperatures, long winters and also the illegal immigration. Me, myself, miss the ocean.
Good Point!

I support your decision to move back to CA. And please tell everyone in CA that CO sucks and is a terrible place to live.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Wherabouts Unknown!
7,841 posts, read 18,999,002 times
Reputation: 9586
Jmm64 wrote:
And please tell everyone in CA that CO sucks and is a terrible place to live.
The same could be said for any state. Colorado does not hold a monopoly on people who say that it sucks. If you think Colorado sucks, then you will probably feel the same way wherever you are. Thinking that a place sucks is an inside job. It's not the place that sucks, but rather your outlook.

Where ever you go, there you are.....and the same sucky attitude is there with you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 04:34 PM
 
529 posts, read 1,547,861 times
Reputation: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicWizard View Post
Jmm64 wrote:
And please tell everyone in CA that CO sucks and is a terrible place to live.
The same could be said for any state. Colorado does not hold a monopoly on people who say that it sucks. If you think Colorado sucks, then you will probably feel the same way wherever you are. Thinking that a place sucks is an inside job. It's not the place that sucks, but rather your outlook.

Where ever you go, there you are.....and the same sucky attitude is there with you.
You didn't catch my tone did you? Read it again and then see what I REALLY meant ; ).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 04:38 PM
 
Location: Wherabouts Unknown!
7,841 posts, read 18,999,002 times
Reputation: 9586
Oh, I caught your tone all right, and I chose to comment on the ignorance that inspired it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 04:51 PM
 
529 posts, read 1,547,861 times
Reputation: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicWizard View Post
Oh, I caught your tone all right, and I chose to comment on the ignorance that inspired it.
You didn't catch what I meant, but you can make what you want of it and are entitled to. USA!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2012, 05:29 PM
 
26,212 posts, read 49,044,521 times
Reputation: 31781
Me? I'm tone-deaf and need a copy of Tone For Dummies to figger it all out....
__________________
- Please follow our TOS.
- Any Questions about City-Data? See the FAQ list.
- Want some detailed instructions on using the site? See The Guide for plain english explanation.
- Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
- Thank you and enjoy City-Data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2012, 12:38 AM
 
67 posts, read 159,462 times
Reputation: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMM64 View Post
Good Point!

I support your decision to move back to CA. And please tell everyone in CA that CO sucks and is a terrible place to live.
I second that motion...Please tell all the CA folks how bad it is and we Coloradans will just sit in our own "misery" alone. wink, wink.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top