Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-12-2008, 11:30 AM
 
197 posts, read 798,330 times
Reputation: 102

Advertisements

I have a co-worker who seems to believe that having alot of email in your inbox (someone who never deletes email) actually slows down the application. Is this possible?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2008, 02:42 PM
 
8,409 posts, read 7,402,622 times
Reputation: 8747
Define "a lot".

I've created software that among other things displayed a visual list of objects (sort of like the list of files in Windows Explorer) and I didn't take into account the number of items that would appear in a list. When the list approached 10,000 objects the application would take minutes to load the visual list. When the list was only 100 objects, the application would load the list in a few seconds. From the application user's point of view, the application was "slowed down" when loading the 10K list of items.

So no, a large list of emails will not slow down the application...unless one is trying to display all 10,000 emails at once.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2008, 03:00 PM
 
Location: West Virginia
16,663 posts, read 15,654,903 times
Reputation: 10916
I recently saw one user that had never file any messages in folders, but had them set to move into an Archive after 30 days. When he got a new computer, moving the archive meant moving 15000 old messages. Yes, it was slow.

Remember, Outlook Express stores all messages in one folder. There is an index and a database for each message folder you have created. It stands to reason that the same slowdown will occur when there are too many indices and databases, with too many records in each one. I've commented before that Outlook Express seems to begin to lose some performance after it hold 1000-2000 messages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2008, 03:13 PM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,675,571 times
Reputation: 37905
The OP never told us what email app he is talking about....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2008, 04:36 PM
 
23,589 posts, read 70,358,767 times
Reputation: 49216
Tek_Freek is right, it really depends on the application and how it was configured. However, speed downloading and uploading shouldn't be affected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2008, 11:41 AM
 
197 posts, read 798,330 times
Reputation: 102
Email application is Microsoft Outlook.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2008, 01:46 PM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,675,571 times
Reputation: 37905
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832925
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Computers
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top