U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-11-2010, 12:59 PM
 
15 posts, read 66,599 times
Reputation: 13

Advertisements

Hello everyone,

I'm curious if linking Norwalk & Danbury via an expressway will ever come to fruition.

The last few weeks I have been commuting to Norwalk from the Danbury area and I'm in disbelief at the amount of congestion, especially between Walmart & DMV in Norwalk.

Thank you,
Uconn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2010, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,027 posts, read 54,650,008 times
Reputation: 10856
Probably won't happen in our lifetime. Wilton, Ridgefield and Redding so opposed the expressway that I believe it has been removed from all transportation plans. I guess these towns would rather deal with nightmare traffic than a safe modern highway. Again shortsighted IMHO, Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 06:46 AM
 
Location: Northern Virginia
1,418 posts, read 3,397,613 times
Reputation: 435
well but the road has been widened. If you are new to the area, you may not remember how route 7 was single lane from Wilton all the way up to Danbury. Now at least it's been widened to two for a significant portion of that trip. It's a huge improvement.

This is an interesting article on the failure of Super 7 and potential plans for a "Greenway", which would be nice, though certainly wouldn't alleviate traffic.

Long-planned super highway may yield to greenway - Connecticut Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Florida
11,669 posts, read 17,462,401 times
Reputation: 8229
I highly doubt U.S. 7 will ever be upgraded to a limited access highway between Norwalk and Danbury for the entire length. At least not within the next decade or two. They did, however, make such an upgrade north of Danbury, heading through Brookfield and into New Milford. CT has numerous unfinished highways; the most notorious being Route 11, which ends in Salem with an abandoned bridge. Another one is Route 9 in Farmington. There are unused ramps and cleared out land there, when the highway was supposed to go all the way up to Granby, but later was cancelled. Others include:
  • I-384, which was supposed to go to Providence, but currently ends in Bolton, CT.
  • I-291, which was supposed to be a large beltway around Hartford's immediate suburbs. Only one segment was ever built (from Windsor to Manchester).
  • Route 10 was supposed to be a major highway from New Haven to Granby for its entire length.
  • Route 20 was supposed to be a highway from Granby to Vernon and would have crossed the river.
  • Route 189 was supposed to be a highway from Hartford to Granby center. One portion was built in North Bloomfield. It's 1/2 mile long and has one exit. Also, you can see huge flyover ramps around exit 46 off I-84 in Hartford, which is where the two highways would have junctioned.
  • Route 140 was supposed to be a full highway.
There are many more CT routes that were supposed to be limited access highways, but they were either opposed by locals or the state lacked the funds necessary to build them. Now, the state suffers from traffic congestion in many of these areas, and we can see why. Route 10 is awful IMO, and is the main artery through numerous town centers with no nearby highway access.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Texas
2,394 posts, read 3,992,761 times
Reputation: 1410
Quote:
Originally Posted by nep321 View Post
[/list]There are many more CT routes that were supposed to be limited access highways, but they were either opposed by locals or the state lacked the funds necessary to build them. Now, the state suffers from traffic congestion in many of these areas, and we can see why. Route 10 is awful IMO, and is the main artery through numerous town centers with no nearby highway access.
Same story for CT25 -- stopped at Trumbull, was supposed to connect to I-84 in Newtown. It would have been a great benefit to Trumbull, Monroe and Newtown to take all the truck and through traffic off their main n/s arterial street. CT25 is 2 lane the whole way from Trumbull northward.

Now the plan is to disassemble the ramps from I-84 in Newtown, giving up entirely on the possibility of finishing 25.

Connecticut - the land of unfinished highways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 10:42 AM
 
680 posts, read 1,543,294 times
Reputation: 180
Try convincing the million dollar mc mansion owners beside route 7 that its a good idea for their property value. Good Luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Northern Virginia
1,418 posts, read 3,397,613 times
Reputation: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Konig1985 View Post
Try convincing the million dollar mc mansion owners beside route 7 that its a good idea for their property value. Good Luck!

interesting. There really aren't alot of "million dollar mc mansion" owners right "beside route 7". In fact, much of the opposition came from owners of historic old houses, which is way more common to find along route 7. Oh and there weren't many "McMansions" here in the early 80s when this was being debated. It was about perserving the more rural, historic character of these towns, not running a super highway through them. And again, as the article I linked mentioned, it was not just a widening of the current route 7, it was going to really mean a significant change to the area. I lived in a cottage in the early 90s in Wilton (a rental on a bigger, historic property - 1700s) about a mile, maybe 1.5 miles from the current route 7, and the "Super 7" was planned to come right by the property lines, which was so hard to fathom that it was so off the current route, but that's why you had opposition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 02:36 PM
 
680 posts, read 1,543,294 times
Reputation: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by arielmina View Post
interesting. There really aren't alot of "million dollar mc mansion" owners right "beside route 7". In fact, much of the opposition came from owners of historic old houses, which is way more common to find along route 7. Oh and there weren't many "McMansions" here in the early 80s when this was being debated. It was about perserving the more rural, historic character of these towns, not running a super highway through them. And again, as the article I linked mentioned, it was not just a widening of the current route 7, it was going to really mean a significant change to the area. I lived in a cottage in the early 90s in Wilton (a rental on a bigger, historic property - 1700s) about a mile, maybe 1.5 miles from the current route 7, and the "Super 7" was planned to come right by the property lines, which was so hard to fathom that it was so off the current route, but that's why you had opposition.
1.5 miles EAST or WEST?

Indeed there are not many Mc Mansions right beside route 7 but a lot of properties affected fetch close to a million. My agent told me some house at the end of chessor ln, Wilton have to drop price to be sold during boom time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Northern Virginia
1,418 posts, read 3,397,613 times
Reputation: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Konig1985 View Post
1.5 miles EAST or WEST?

Indeed there are not many Mc Mansions right beside route 7 but a lot of properties affected fetch close to a million. My agent told me some house at the end of chessor ln, Wilton have to drop price to be sold during boom time.

EAST...off of rt 106. LOTS of old beautiful and historic homes.

Last edited by arielmina; 10-12-2010 at 07:22 PM.. Reason: got my easts and wests confused :)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2010, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Live in NY, work in CT
11,073 posts, read 18,259,408 times
Reputation: 4910
I had heard that at one time way back there were some thoughts of Rt. 7 being a "Super" Super 7 that would've gone from Norwalk to Burlington,VT. Even well north of Danbury there are stretches that are limited-access highway, like one going from Bennington, VT north aways.

All of you pining about the "land of unfinished roads" will like this site: Connecticut Roads
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top