Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2015, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Northeast states
14,055 posts, read 13,934,018 times
Reputation: 5198

Advertisements

How feel about this ? Pepsi and M&M's would cost bit more.

Bill would tax sugary drinks, candy in Connecticut - Connecticut Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2015, 11:07 PM
 
Location: USA
2,753 posts, read 3,312,539 times
Reputation: 2192
So is the state turning into Mrs Obama? Telling people what to eat and not to eat. Just kidding but...

I kind of knew this was going to happen. The state lowering sales tax and raising something else under the publics eye. I think it's a good idea to try and lower obesity but if they want to eat it then so be it. It's there choice not the states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2015, 11:08 PM
 
684 posts, read 812,295 times
Reputation: 766
It scares me that people like this that are so out of touch with reality are coming up with bills. If you dont want your child to be obese then dont let them eat what they want and stop feeding them junk food. WTF is wrong with people and this country? It is sickening that we need taxes and laws for common sense.

Are people this ignorant and brain washed? Wow. What makes me laugh even more is how they want to use the extra money for programs to fight obesity ... Yea my ass, just extra money into the states pockets while everyone else picks up the bills. So if people dont buy these drinks then what do the big companies do ? Just close up and then more people on unemployment ? Yea that is the liberal brain at work, so backwards.

Last edited by MiaMia411; 02-17-2015 at 11:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2015, 11:30 PM
 
64 posts, read 151,810 times
Reputation: 57
Probably isn't going to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2015, 03:47 AM
 
Location: Northeast states
14,055 posts, read 13,934,018 times
Reputation: 5198
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanExplorer View Post
So is the state turning into Mrs Obama? Telling people what to eat and not to eat. Just kidding but...

I kind of knew this was going to happen. The state lowering sales tax and raising something else under the publics eye. I think it's a good idea to try and lower obesity but if they want to eat it then so be it. It's there choice not the states.

So higher taxes on cigarettes stop people from smoking
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2015, 05:29 AM
 
1,231 posts, read 2,688,061 times
Reputation: 582
Boo .... Stupid people in Hartford should get their eyes offa the Easter Bunny's Basket.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2015, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
5,104 posts, read 4,833,833 times
Reputation: 3636
I saw this too in the news again a few days ago. Rosa Delauro first proposed it last year. I think the guy now is a state of Ct rep not a Fed Rep.

If they want to do something about obesity they should cut the subsidies to the food manufacturers and the corn growers first. Then there's no need to tax the end products.

A politician in Puerto Rico just proposed a bill that would fine parents of obese children. These politicians are getting crazier every year.

Puerto Rico Wants to Fine Parents of Obese Children - NBC News

or

Obesity.org - puerto-rico-blames-parents-of-children-with-obesity-considers-fines
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2015, 09:09 AM
 
14 posts, read 32,471 times
Reputation: 14
What's next, a tax on unhealthy meals?
We could have a food patrol. They will randomly check homes and tax them accordingly.
Then we could have a security guard in all supermarkets making sure you buy the right food.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2015, 09:39 AM
 
Location: ATL
170 posts, read 235,158 times
Reputation: 302
I figure these would be a bit like vice taxes. I think it's reasonable. It doesn't solve the root problem, but making clean food more affordable than junk certainly helps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2015, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
470 posts, read 1,665,247 times
Reputation: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by UsernameCreativity View Post
I figure these would be a bit like vice taxes. I think it's reasonable. It doesn't solve the root problem, but making clean food more affordable than junk certainly helps.
Yes and no. It makes the junk food more expensive by an artificial price control. The underlying problem is that healthy food is far too expensive compared to junk food.

Making junk food more expensive won't solve the problem. They need to find a way to make healthy food less expensive. There is no excuse for the fact that the 4 oreos i had with my lunch cost a fraction of what the single apple I had with it as well did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top