Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2009, 12:40 PM
 
438 posts, read 1,192,202 times
Reputation: 275

Advertisements

Here's a quote from a copy of the regulations, which may not be entirely up to date:

Quote:
“Steering” means to restrict or attempt to restrict, because of race, creed, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, familial status, marital status, age, sexual orientation, lawful source of income, learning disability, mental retardation or physical or mental disability, including but not limited to blindness or deafness, the choices of a person by word or conduct in connection with seeking, negotiating for, buying or renting a dwelling so as to perpetuate, or tend to perpetuate, segregated housing patterns, or to discourage or obstruct choices in a community, neighborhood or development.
I don't think it could be any more clear, really. If an individual wants to seek out an area where a particular demographic is present or absent, they have to do it on their own. Talking about the good or bad quality of a "neighborhood" is a known euphemism for its racial makeup, and was a means through which real estate agents steered white clients away from minority neighborhoods, and helped to enforce de facto segregation.

HeadedWest, how would you suggest the state proceed, so that on the one hand real estate agents are permitted to be "frank", but on the other hand things like blockbusting and Gentleman's Agreement scenarios are prevented?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2009, 05:27 PM
 
438 posts, read 1,192,202 times
Reputation: 275
One example of the hot water that an agency can get into: here's a press release about a real estate company that got sued for telling white clients that a particular area had "bad schools", while saying nothing of the sort to its black and Latino cllents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Texas
2,394 posts, read 4,067,225 times
Reputation: 1411
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldenband View Post
HeadedWest, how would you suggest the state proceed, so that on the one hand real estate agents are permitted to be "frank", but on the other hand things like blockbusting and Gentleman's Agreement scenarios are prevented?
Just give me the damn master key and I'll go look at the houses on my own. If you won't answer serious questions, of what use are you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 06:23 PM
 
438 posts, read 1,192,202 times
Reputation: 275
That's not actually an answer to my question, though. What do you think CT state policy SHOULD be? Should agencies be prevented from steering, and if so, how -- or, for that matter, is steering a-OK with you?

(BTW I am not a real estate agent, nor anything like one, in case there's any confusion.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Cheshire, Conn.
2,102 posts, read 7,732,829 times
Reputation: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadedWest View Post
Just give me the damn master key and I'll go look at the houses on my own. If you won't answer serious questions, of what use are you?
It's not a matter of won't, but can't, which has been mentioned several times. If the general public has a problem with this, they can certainly voice it with their legislators.

Now, as for what buyer agents do, here are a few things:

1) We let buyers in to see the properties (as you mentioned). We are entrusted by sellers that we will make sure that nothing gets vandalized, stolen, etc. We also leave the premises the way they were before our visit.

2) We provide buyers with CMA's and other data so that they have the most current information on what is happening in the market when making their offer.

3) We remind buyers of important dates in their contract (inspection, mortgage commitment) and prepare extensions when needed.

4) We do tell them about geographical information on a town or area (highway access, census data in a macro sense, etc.).

What we don't do:

1) We don't tell buyers which town(s) from their list would be the best one for them.

2) We don't tell buyers how much a property will appreciate in the future.

3) We don't give an opinion on the schools though we can provide web sites that give ranking information.

4) We don't promise or guarantee that an area is "safe."

5) We don't alert them to churches or correctional institutions. If the faith of a particular buyer requires him/her to walk to worship on certain holidays, we ask them to provide the address of the church/temple/mosque and an acceptable walking distance. We then find the streets that would satisfy the criteria. Once we know the streets, we then can search for available properties.

6) We don't advise on property (structural) condition or whether an inspection should be waived.

7) We don't comment on which segment of the population might live in a certain part of town.

8) We don't comment on why prices are lower (or higher) in a certain part of town except to state that that is the historical trend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top