Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-17-2009, 10:10 AM
 
9 posts, read 40,066 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

Hi everyone. I'm looking in N. Stamford, 1st time home buyer. Most of the houses in our price range (mid to upper 600's) were built in the 1960's. We saw one that was build in 1940.

Can anyone comment on the age of homes here, when a house would be considered "too" old, etc.? We are staying away from homes build in the 20's just because that just sounds antique at that point, but what do we know!!

Many thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-17-2009, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,948 posts, read 56,980,181 times
Reputation: 11229
No home is too old as long as it has been maintained and updated. Some of the best and most desirable homes in New England are hundreds of years old. As my father always said "Just because it is old does not mean it is no good". Rather than limiting yourself by the age of the home, limit your search to the condition of home. There are MANY older homes that are in better condition than homes built just a few years ago. Things to look for would be age of the roof, furnace, air conditioner and electrical system. A good home inspector will tell you the life of these and other major items. Also check the appliances, flooring and other sort of cosmetic things. These are things you could change easily over time if necessary and to your taste. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Danbury CT covering all of Fairfield County
2,636 posts, read 7,434,951 times
Reputation: 1378
It depends on how well it is maintained & if the location, layout, property & neighborhood works for you. With any propety, I highly recommend havinga building inspection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2009, 07:21 PM
 
Location: The brown house on the cul de sac
2,080 posts, read 4,846,341 times
Reputation: 9314
Quote:
Originally Posted by futureNoStamforder View Post
Hi everyone. I'm looking in N. Stamford, 1st time home buyer. Most of the houses in our price range (mid to upper 600's) were built in the 1960's. We saw one that was build in 1940.

Can anyone comment on the age of homes here, when a house would be considered "too" old, etc.? We are staying away from homes build in the 20's just because that just sounds antique at that point, but what do we know!!

Many thanks!
A home is never too old....old homes have such character! I agree with the above posts...many of the older homes in the state have already been updated or have replaced the roof, heating, added ac ..that kind of stuff! If you like the house and the neighborhood and it is in good condition...then don't worry about the age of the house! You will have to have a home inspection anyway! Keep in mind, they don't build em these days like they used to!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2009, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Cheshire, Conn.
2,102 posts, read 7,760,058 times
Reputation: 539
Some folks have a real aversion to houses made between 1973 - 1982 claiming shoddy workmanship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2009, 11:22 AM
 
418 posts, read 1,411,372 times
Reputation: 154
I would pick a 1920s house over 1960s anyday- just get it insulated and you'll be set.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2009, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Groton, CT
181 posts, read 557,665 times
Reputation: 103
I agree with most of the other posters, the age of the home really doesn't matter so much, but rather the condition. My parent's house was built just before 1900 and it is in great condition, and actually doesn't require much upkeep at all. And on the other hand, I know people that own houses that have been built in the last 30 years that are falling apart despite their best efforts to maintain them. And like Silli said, I would pick a 1920s house over a 1960s house anyday if for no other reason than the styling.

Good luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top