Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-10-2014, 05:08 PM
 
Location: Charleston, SC
7,103 posts, read 5,997,085 times
Reputation: 5712

Advertisements

There's seems to be praise and fallout already even though this is going to take several years to take full effect. The coalitions pushing for the raise were fighting under the stance that $500 million would be pumped into Seattle's economy.

The opposing side says that they will have to trickle down the increased wages to the consumer by way of "cost of living" charges.

It will be interesting to see this play out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2014, 07:10 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,933,857 times
Reputation: 18305
It does go into effect for some years from what I read. Of course the cost has to be covered in cost which is probably why they did make it immediately effective. it just adds to inflation cost in state as cost are covered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2014, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,626 posts, read 12,307,998 times
Reputation: 5233
Historically inflation has always outpaced minimum wage increases over the last 40 years. When you factor in the middle class job loss putting cash in the hands of consumers can't be worse than what we have now.
The Chinese have gone from bicycles to cars while Americans are going from cars to bicycles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 08:26 AM
 
865 posts, read 2,164,341 times
Reputation: 954
The problem isn't McDonalds paying their employees $7 an hour. The problem is - the only employer is McDonalds, who is paying their employees $7 an hour.

The powers that be don't allow real jobs any more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 02:34 PM
 
741 posts, read 765,023 times
Reputation: 577
Quote:
A federal lawsuit filed Wednesday challenges Seattle's adoption of what would
be the nation's highest minimum wage as unfair to small franchises.

The Seattle City Council voted unanimously this month
to gradually raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. The plan gives businesses
with more than 500 employees nationally at least three years to phase in the
increase — four if they provide health insurance. Smaller employers get seven
years.
Read the story in its entirety, here: Lawsuit Challenges Seattle's $15 Minimum Wage - ABC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 03:25 PM
 
Location: La Mesa Aka The Table
9,825 posts, read 11,569,318 times
Reputation: 11900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller88 View Post
The problem isn't McDonalds paying their employees $7 an hour. The problem is - the only employer is McDonalds, who is paying their employees $7 an hour.

The powers that be don't allow real jobs any more.
This^^^^.... End of Thread
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Charleston, SC
7,103 posts, read 5,997,085 times
Reputation: 5712
The Socialist party in Seattle was totally against the ramp up period as well and were planning on suing. They were looking for an immediate raise in minimum wage and were upset at the agreement reached.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 07:02 PM
 
Location: NW AR
2,438 posts, read 2,814,824 times
Reputation: 2285
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiseManOnceSaid View Post
There's seems to be praise and fallout already even though this is going to take several years to take full effect. The coalitions pushing for the raise were fighting under the stance that $500 million would be pumped into Seattle's economy.

The opposing side says that they will have to trickle down the increased wages to the consumer by way of "cost of living" charges.

It will be interesting to see this play out.
Does that mean Bezos is willing to pay his baby kindles- fifteen bucks and change? Or, is he going to claim that Amazon is actually on the moon and considered to be a distributor with warehouses that does not produce anything along with his third party asteroids? ( That is the strategy that he took against sales tax in previous years)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 07:37 PM
 
Location: DMV
10,125 posts, read 13,999,497 times
Reputation: 3222
Is making a living and trying to raise a family in a major metropolitan area like Seattle, really realistic? Things are expensive for a reason. When you want to live close to things that everybody else wants, you have to pay for it. It's called demand. I think it's stupid to think that we are enabling so many people to try to make a living without going out getting skills, and education that would put them in a better position to earn even more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2014, 08:30 PM
 
Location: NW AR
2,438 posts, read 2,814,824 times
Reputation: 2285
Quote:
Originally Posted by justtitans View Post
Is making a living and trying to raise a family in a major metropolitan area like Seattle, really realistic? Things are expensive for a reason. When you want to live close to things that everybody else wants, you have to pay for it. It's called demand. I think it's stupid to think that we are enabling so many people to try to make a living without going out getting skills, and education that would put them in a better position to earn even more.
Actually the cost of goods will have to go up to cover it. So, the $15.00 isn't going to solve anything. I can't imagine this going off in just one state.. but good luck to Washington. I hope this works-out for them. So, if a dozen roses are $75, they will have to go up to at least $125.. Again, the wealthy will be paying for the double wage increase.. or paying for/to their children ( basically) through a wage hike.

I guess that's better than the annual family BBQ dinner in the backyard. Or a room in the old house.. These kids are paying taxes through their $7 an hour

Last edited by thegreenflute334; 06-11-2014 at 08:41 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top