Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:23 AM
 
3,038 posts, read 2,414,036 times
Reputation: 3765

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Sounds scary to me.
I hear they can go through schools and are fired from the shoulder thing that goes up.

 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:23 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,276 posts, read 47,032,885 times
Reputation: 34063
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpm1 View Post
Military guns are not really any more effective than common civilian firearms.
Plus, almost every style of weapon is used by some military at some point in time.
 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:23 AM
 
1,994 posts, read 1,520,837 times
Reputation: 2924
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
I'm not sure I agree. I have seen people at the range who are just hopeless with a handgun ... even at 5 yards One of them was a former cop
There are people who can't hit the broadside of a barn with a shotgun too. Doesn't mean much.
 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:24 AM
 
3,038 posts, read 2,414,036 times
Reputation: 3765
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
BINGO!

That confiscation strawman was introduced in this thread by a gun nut.

No thinking person is even suggesting confiscation of firearms legally owned. Controlling WHO would be legally entitled to own one and their usage as the SWISS very aggressively do is what people wanting to discuss.
Bingo? This person is advocating for banning things already in possession. What do you do with things that are already in peoples possession and you ban them? The word is confiscate.
 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:24 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,276 posts, read 47,032,885 times
Reputation: 34063
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpm1 View Post
I hear they can go through schools and are fired from the shoulder thing that goes up.
with visible abs? (cal guns)
 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:24 AM
 
1,994 posts, read 1,520,837 times
Reputation: 2924
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
BINGO!

That confiscation strawman was introduced in this thread by a gun nut.

No thinking person is even suggesting confiscation of firearms legally owned. Controlling WHO would be legally entitled to own one and their usage as the SWISS very aggressively do is what people wanting to discuss.
Legally owned. According to...?
 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:24 AM
 
7,413 posts, read 6,228,034 times
Reputation: 6665
What were the racist comments?
 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:25 AM
 
3,038 posts, read 2,414,036 times
Reputation: 3765
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Plus, almost every style of weapon is used by some military at some point in time.
My Mosin Nagant is a tactical gun with the shoulder thing that goes up a BAYONET and HIGH POWERED AMMUNITION!!
 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:25 AM
 
Location: God's Country
5,182 posts, read 5,250,973 times
Reputation: 8689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
I love it when people try to claim that European gun laws only work because they're mostly white. Why is it that cities like Paris, Amsterdam are still safer than the vast majority of American cities when they're very, very ethnically diverse? The murder rate of Paris is like 1.2/100k. Chicago is 15/100k. NYC is around 3.8/100k. Seattle which is considered a safe American city is 3.4/100k.
Show us the data to prove that they Euro cities are "very, very ethnically diverse," por favor.
 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
5,751 posts, read 10,377,273 times
Reputation: 7010
Quote:
Originally Posted by no1brownsfan View Post
Gun control to me means use 2 hands. Quite honestly, I think EVERY red-blooded American (who is not a felon) should properly train themselves in the use and handling of firearms. There would be less accidents, and it may just put a dent in crime."
Agree... We also need to account for the extremely intellectually challenged in our mist. You know, the morons who leave a loaded, unlocked gun on a bedstand for the 2 year old to grab. I think women, in particular, should have a gun and train themselves on how to safely use it, as a gun is the "great equalizer' - protection against a bigger, armed person(s).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top