Chicago mother fatally attacks 2-year-old because she wouldn't eat her noodles

[InchingWest]

Oh well, two less welfare recipients.

Of course it's a wash considering taxpayers are going to be funneling money directly to Corrections Corporation of America instead of indirectly to Wal-Mart, PhillipMorris, Anheuser-Busch, overpriced convenience stores, and the local slumlord.

[WeHa]

Originally Posted by InchingWest

Oh well, two less welfare recipients.

Of course it's a wash considering taxpayers are going to be funneling money directly to Corrections Corporation of America instead of indirectly to Wal-Mart, PhillipMorris, Anheuser-Busch, overpriced convenience stores, and the local slumlord.

Wow, not a lot blows me away on this site anymore. But I mean really? You're reducing the murder of a child to a "positive" because we won't have to pay welfare?

What kind of sick mind do you have to even make that connection.

[Teckeeee]

Originally Posted by Minervah

Don't make excuses for her. No one needs to learn "parenting skills" at any age to tell them you don't punch a two year old in the stomach for not eating noodles or for any other reason. Anyone who doesn't know that shouldn't be having kids in the first place.

Wow, sad

[parentologist]

Actually there IS something that you can do! It's called Project Prevention, and it pays people who are addicts to get on long term birth control (think implant) or to get sterilized.

Project Prevention - Children Requiring a Caring Community

Donations are tax deductible.

[rhiannon67]

Originally Posted by Ringo1

I hope they take that baby and NEVER, EVER give her back to her "mother'. And I use that term very, very loosely. She's an incubator.

an egg donor.

POS deserves a public execution. She's no parent.

Poor baby girl...

[sheena12]

Originally Posted by NLVgal

Why the hell did dcfs give that kid back after mom threw her over a balcony for crying out loud?!

Because according to dcfs, children are always best with their biological "parents" and reunification should ALWAYS be the goal.

Then stuff like this happens.

[sheena12]

Originally Posted by WeHa

Wow, not a lot blows me away on this site anymore. But I mean really? You're reducing the murder of a child to a "positive" because we won't have to pay welfare?

What kind of sick mind do you have to even make that connection.

I agree. Not sure which makes me more sick - the murder of this child or that bizarre and cruel comment?

Equally sick.

[rhiannon67]

Originally Posted by InchingWest

Oh well, two less welfare recipients.

Of course it's a wash considering taxpayers are going to be funneling money directly to Corrections Corporation of America instead of indirectly to Wal-Mart, PhillipMorris, Anheuser-Busch, overpriced convenience stores, and the local slumlord.

One of the most uncouth comments I have ever had the displeasure to read on here.

How would you react if someone said this about a child in your family?

Despicable.

[TXNGL]

Originally Posted by sheena12

I agree. Not sure which makes me more sick - the murder of this child or that bizarre and cruel comment?

Equally sick.

Yes. I'm stunned. That sort of crass thinking amazes me and scares me just as much as the actions of the "mother" in question.

[author1986]

and people are worried about the police? Sounds like the vast majority of people in Chicago are nuts and violent. Almost makes LA seem like a model city, although I'll stick with PDX.