Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2016, 12:55 PM
 
29,522 posts, read 22,674,035 times
Reputation: 48244

Advertisements

While I feel for her, there is obviously going to be huge risks for someone so large.

If somehow the surgery was allowed, and she suffered terrible complications, I'm sure the family would then file a lawsuit for negligence and all of that.

Lose-lose situation.

Houston 740-lb. woman needs gallbladder surgery but doctors refuse | CW39 NewsFix

Quote:
Desperately in need of gall-bladder surgery, Katrina Randall, was rushed to the hospital on Friday. Her family hopes her latest trip leads to a life-saving procedure but there's a catch - her family says doctors wont operate because of her size. She weighs 740 pounds.

"Most doctors say if she can't walk in, we can't see her," said her father Kenneth Randall.

"We transferred her to the hospital hoping someone would actually take the next step in doing the gallbladder surgery."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2016, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Sarasota, FL
2,682 posts, read 2,181,994 times
Reputation: 5170
The people who are in the best position to weigh the risks of surgery vs no surgery are her doctors. If they chose to operate, liability for malpractice wouldn't be an issue if she were willing to sign a detailed document showing her informed consent and waiver of liability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 02:05 PM
 
Location: When you take flak it means you are on target
7,646 posts, read 9,956,572 times
Reputation: 16466
They'd need an excavation team to get deep enough to find it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Murphy, North Carolina
2,141 posts, read 1,388,625 times
Reputation: 1724
I don't mean to be the bad guy here...

But with her size, you really can't blame the doctors here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Honolulu
137 posts, read 255,854 times
Reputation: 122
Can't blame the doctors. They know what they are doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 03:38 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,600,924 times
Reputation: 16439
If they did do surgery and she died people would say that medical errors killed her. But don't worry, it's all big pharma propaganda anyway. I'm sure all she needs is some pot and a spinal adjustment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 03:51 PM
 
2,301 posts, read 1,887,699 times
Reputation: 2802
Geez how can anyone eat that much??? Poor woman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 05:09 PM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,155 posts, read 12,970,933 times
Reputation: 33185
The doctors' position is understandable. Gallbladder surgery is not a surgery required to save her life. Performing the surgery at her weight could likely end it. She needs to lose weight before they proceed, for her safety.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Stuck on the East Coast, hoping to head West
4,641 posts, read 11,943,169 times
Reputation: 9887
The 740lb weight would concern me far more than the gall bladder. I would think that just weighing that much puts her life at risk every single day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2016, 06:05 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
11,495 posts, read 26,886,067 times
Reputation: 28036
The anesthesia is the big issue here, that and having an operating table that can support her weight.

She would probably have to lose more than half her body weight before they could use general anesthesia safely. I have no idea if they could use a spinal block or epidural for a gall bladder procedure, but any anesthesia that still had her breathing on her own (assuming she can breathe when she's laying flat on her back, and that's a big if) would be less risky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top