Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Her looks are very relevant to this entire fiasco. If she hadn't been pseudo-pretty and young, this man probably would never have looked twice at her, would never have taken her home. His art would still be intact in his home. Her looks/youth probably fueled her sense of entitlement that she could get drunk and be an arse and it would be overlooked. Women who look like she does often get away with all kinds of garbage. In this case, she didn't. It's an interesting point of discussion to talk about attractive people who think they can be jerks.
In response to this
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBeisbol
I wonder what it says about CD, or people in general, that so many of the comments here are about the woman's appearance?
Why would you do that unless there was some connection between the two.
Quote:
People can talk about her looks if they want to.
So?
Have I, or anyone, claimed that they couldn't?
I just said
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBeisbol
I wonder what it says about CD, or people in general, that so many of the comments here are about the woman's appearance?
I thought the same thing most of you did when I saw her cheap tattoo looking eyebrows and spots on face. But I looked so hard and thought those spots must not be real. Lens has to be dirty or she got dirt on her from the crazy night ? I didn't look her up like Clara C did (she says she was a stunner in other pics). Unless this is her face - blotchy beneath the excessive make up she typically wears. She could normally wear make up for deep scars? And this is beneath. It evaporated? I don't know why he would date her if she showed up with the spots on face. It is so bad for his career to be seen with that. So I have to assume they appeared later.
Andy Warhol is laughing. He made fun of art. He didn't intend for it to go for these crazy rates.
And this guy has insurance and will be AOK. He can find other artist to support that may be alive. More noble to support living artist.
I have not read all comments in thread but somebody put down CD b/c we are speaking on her looks. I would not if she was not juxtaposed with a very very well known conservative lawyer from Texas. Not what you expect. If Trump dumps stunning Melania for this lady people would be in SHOCK. I think this is why most are speaking on her looks. Odd match up. Who cares about the art. Insurance takes care of it. And it was Warhol. He didn't even believe in art. He was a drug addict con man. Still a very enjoyable person.
Her looks are very relevant to this entire fiasco. If she hadn't been pseudo-pretty and young, this man probably would never have looked twice at her, would never have taken her home. His art would still be intact in his home. Her looks/youth probably fueled her sense of entitlement that she could get drunk and be an arse and it would be overlooked. Women who look like she does often get away with all kinds of garbage. In this case, she didn't. It's an interesting point of discussion to talk about attractive people who think they can be jerks.
You don't really believe any of that do you ?
She was likely a hooker who didn't get her asking price. No other reason she should just lose it and inflicts millions in damage.
That guy should have just paid her. It would have worked out cheaper.
And because it was for charity, the million cost was then tax deductible.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.