Woman is arrested for shooting and killing driver who cut her off and then bragging about the murder on Facebook
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wow. I owned my first real gun around 1980 at the age of 10. (I had a BB-gun long before that lol.)
Guns are a tool, an object and can therefore be a defensive, offensive etc. weapon.
Heck, you can use them to plant flowers in or throw at squirrels if you so choose but the idea that their usage is predetermined to be non-offensive is patently ridiculous.
I hope you just mistyped and didn't think through your argument fully.
...I don't know why people get so angry from road issues...
I don't even know what it means, "to cut someone off". What is that? When someone makes a lane change too close to the car behind? How often does that happen to anyone, and why would it make someone mad? Some people don't figure out which lane they need to be in, until they're almost at their turn. Or they're weaving in and out, but I've never been "cut off" by someone doing that. Or maybe I just don't find it problematic. What's all the fuss about? And how could it be bad enough to shoot someone over?
A man was murdered, but somehow the attractiveness of his killer is important?? Who cares what she looks like... How it that in any way relevant to the story?
A man was murdered, but somehow the attractiveness of his killer is important?? Who cares what she looks like... How it that in any way relevant to the story?
It's relevant (and you would know this if you bothered to read all the posts) because that is not a woman. Jumping to conclusions is not an "attractive" trait.
Wow. I owned my first real gun around 1980 at the age of 10. (I had a BB-gun long before that lol.)
Guns are a tool, an object and can therefore be a defensive, offensive etc. weapon.
Heck, you can use them to plant flowers in or throw at squirrels if you so choose but the idea that their usage is predetermined to be non-offensive is patently ridiculous.
I hope you just mistyped and didn't think through your argument fully.
As tools go.. While anyone can use them in any method.. Responsible gun owners don't use them in an offensive manner.. At least against people. Leaving hunting and target practice out of this..
Defensive? Sure. I would certainly hope that is the intent of anyone who owns a gun. The mentality of "This is for my protection".. Not "I can use this to go out and shoot people"
Is it your position that an acceptable use of a gun is "If someone pisses me off, I can shoot them"?
If you like.. Next time someone makes you mad.. Pull out a gun.. See how that ends. I suspect it will end with you not being able to own a gun anymore. A citizen with a gun should only be using it in a defensive, not offensive, manner.
Provide one example where an ordinary citizen should be using a gun in an offensive manner that isn't illegal, keeping as mentioned above, hunting and target practice out.
IT is annoying that the media hasn’t mastered pronouns yet.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.