Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Being from Brooklyn, I love this comment. He should drink a Brass Monkey to ease his pain.
Im surprised this guy still had hard copy media of the films, including magazines. Everything is digital now. He could have simply converted it and moved it anonymously. I don't think his parents had a right to destroy his belongings though. It does not sound like the content was if an illegal nature.
Status:
"This too shall pass. But possibly, like a kidney stone."
(set 15 days ago)
36,037 posts, read 18,311,343 times
Reputation: 51093
If I were sitting on that jury, and he is able to give a convincing account of what he owned and the value, I'd certainly consider awarding that amount to him.
This is no different, IMHO, from a person who rounds up their ex's property in their home and sets fire to it in the front yard.
A typical 'both parties at fault' situation that could easily have ben avoided with a little common sense being applied. He had no business bringing something into his parents home that he knew they disapproved of, and they had no right to destroy his property.
You can bet there are other 'issues' at play here, and this guy's first mistake was moving back home at all. But if he had no other choice, then rent a small storage shed, or borrow space from a friend for his porn.
If I was on the jury, I'd be tempted to find for the plaintiff and award damages in the amount of $1.00 .
A typical 'both parties at fault' situation that could easily have ben avoided with a little common sense being applied. He had no business bringing something into his parents home that he knew they disapproved of, and they had no right to destroy his property.
You can bet there are other 'issues' at play here, and this guy's first mistake was moving back home at all. But if he had no other choice, then rent a small storage shed, or borrow space from a friend for his porn.
If I was on the jury, I'd be tempted to find for the plaintiff and award damages in the amount of $1.00 .
Im a guy but Ive never understood why so many guys love porn like this, back in younger days, I preferred the real thing... looking at a magazines was a waste of time!
I think what Dad was trying to say with his comment about emotional and mental health is that the son's marriage failed because he preferred his cherished porn and sex toys to a live woman.
And since Sonny felt the "need" to move all that crap into his parent's house despite being told not to, it looks like Dad might have been right.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
