Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Dallas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-21-2007, 03:58 PM
 
141 posts, read 686,061 times
Reputation: 74

Advertisements

I hope you are right. I work out of my home, my companies headquarters is in chicago. We had a web conference call yesterday, well the Owner and CEO of the companiy did all the talking, but every employee in the US and Europe could log on to it and send in questions. In years past we have had to trek to chicago for a lot of meetings and this was so nice. More companies could do this, think of all the gas that could be saved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-21-2007, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Allen, Texas
670 posts, read 2,998,208 times
Reputation: 203
I think telecommuting for *some* jobs will be the way to go at least on a few days a week basis. My husband has this ability for his old work and really could for his new place of employment, but they are like 20 years behind as far as management (can you say micromanagement issues ). My girlfriend works in Plano and as of tomorrow will be living in Plano, and she telecommutes sometimes...even though work is less than 5 miles from her apartment. My old neighbor across the street would telecommute when the roads were icy or if the kids (they had 3 under 3 at that time, now they have 5 and are expecting No. 6!) were up all night and wife needed help. I think it's fabulous. Oh yeah my mom does too, her company is in Richardson and she's in Frisco. Mine is in South Carolina and currently I work in Georgia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2007, 05:01 PM
 
Location: DFW, TX
2,935 posts, read 6,714,410 times
Reputation: 572
Given the tools, many jobs would work for telecommuting. It's just that today many companies lack the tools that make telecommuting productive.

Given high def video conferencing, ip telephony, online collaboration, meeting capabilities with audio, video, and collaboration tie-ins all make it much easier to virtualize a team. There's less overhead involved for the company since it has to maintain less office space, it has green benefits with reduced emissions due to commuting, and Sun Microsystems found that employees wound up working 60% of the time they would have spent commuting to/from work. It's also a huge win for disaster planning... if your team is spread out across the US, a single natural disaster has limited impact on the workflow of the team.

Eventually the tools and bandwidth will be available to provide a ubiquitous environment for remote workers. The earlier statement was about 20 years from now we will all live close to cities, and I feel the opposite way. The technology available in 20 years will enable us to do the opposite.

But back to the subject at hand... home appreciation I feel people will come into this market from the coasts where there is a high cost of living. These are the people that will flock to Plano, Frisco, McKinney, Southlake, Keller, etc. I would guess the areas of highest potential appreciation would be in Collin and Denton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2007, 05:26 PM
 
9 posts, read 71,543 times
Reputation: 14
How did the topic go from home appreciation to telecommuting?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2007, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
937 posts, read 2,905,969 times
Reputation: 320
People in the suburbs trying to justify why they think the burbs will appreciate faster than Dallas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2007, 05:53 PM
 
16,087 posts, read 41,147,800 times
Reputation: 6376
The MLS reports are against them!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2007, 12:03 AM
 
Location: Lake Highlands (Dallas)
2,394 posts, read 8,593,636 times
Reputation: 1040
Quote:
Originally Posted by twojciac View Post
The earlier statement was about 20 years from now we will all live close to cities, and I feel the opposite way. The technology available in 20 years will enable us to do the opposite.
Actually, I believe if you read my entire statement, you will see that I said that densities in the US are going to increase along with public transportation, encouraged by steadily increasing energy and materials costs. As that happens, appreciation near downtown locations will happen at a faster rate than the outlying areas.

Surely, technology has offered telecommuting as a viable option and will increase in popularity over the next 20 years, but I highly doubt it will replace the office. Until there can be a virtual reality office world from home - offices are going to remain the main business places. Telecommuting is not going to play a role in housing appreciation (atleast not to any notable extent).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2007, 05:54 AM
 
Location: Allen, Texas
670 posts, read 2,998,208 times
Reputation: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by lh_newbie View Post
Actua Telecommuting is not going to play a role in housing appreciation (atleast not to any notable extent).
Oh I agree with that, I was just sharing my experience with telecommuting because to be honest I *like* the burbs and in some areas/regions...the country.

From my life experience the closer to the major cities you are, the faster your home appreciates AND sells if you want it to AND is in demand. I mean I remember Riverside, California or Temecula NO ONE would live there and want to commute, but a house there was significantly less than say Anaheim or some areas of Los Angeles county. Same with Baton Rouge versus say Watson, Louisiana. I think that's the nature of the beast, and it makes sense the closer you ARE to the majority of the jobs, the more valuable your real estate is.

Last edited by USA_Mom; 08-22-2007 at 05:54 AM.. Reason: Added slash between areas/regions
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2007, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Lake Highlands (Dallas)
2,394 posts, read 8,593,636 times
Reputation: 1040
Quote:
Originally Posted by USA_Mom View Post
Oh I agree with that, I was just sharing my experience with telecommuting because to be honest I *like* the burbs and in some areas/regions...the country.
Totally cool with that. In fact, I think even in the future, suburbs are going to continue to be popular. My posts were about macro trends as they apply to home appreciation. I do feel that DFW is a rather extreme example of suburbanization - and in the future, that trend will slow. It's not, IMO, ever going to stop - there are too many people with different wants/needs. But the trend in the future will slowly shift toward higher density developments with work/live/play designs.

Speaking of far reaching burbs - if you've been to California, you're well aware that people will drive 2 hours to the office so they can get an affordable home. It's obviously a long, LONG ways away before Dallas has that sort of issue since we have one thing California doesn't - large quantities of flat, buildable land (yup, it's a strength as well as a weakness - no ocean means more land). Public transportation can, and has in CA, made living further from the more densely packed job centers a viable option. For this reason, I believe home appreciation will also be higher the closer to a transit station a home is located.

Brian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2007, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Allen, Texas
670 posts, read 2,998,208 times
Reputation: 203
I think in the future that being closer to public transportation will be a big seller, Americans love their cars (I do!) but at some point there is going to be a cut off if things don't change.

I noticed also even in the suburbs the trend towards work/play/live lifestyles. There is a place up in Frisco trying to do that (I think it's called Frisco Square but I'm in Georgia and don't drive by it regularly enough to remember obviously ) and the one at Legacy and the Tollway. If I was single or married without 3 kids, I think it would be a blast to be in an area like that. When I moved out initially as a 19-year-old I got an apartment in downtown Huntington Beach just for that experience. It was fun and I never regreted the then $535 a month for 535 square feet. My husband, being from the South, couldn't believe rent was that much for my first place--but you pay for the niceties and well the ocean.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Dallas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top