U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Dallas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is the beauty of the Metroplex underrated?
Yes, definitely! 22 32.84%
No, not at all 23 34.33%
Somewhat, not entirely 22 32.84%
Voters: 67. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-13-2013, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,390 posts, read 25,165,923 times
Reputation: 10566

Advertisements

Same answer I gave in the "Is Houston beautiful" thread. It has some nice spots, but overall no it isn't beautiful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2013, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,471 posts, read 9,531,180 times
Reputation: 3249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
North Texas' topography is monotonous. I don't think its underrated at all.

Wide open prairie with clusters of small trees scattered here & there. Thank God for man made lakes otherwise it really would be horrible.
I'm starting to think trees is the only thing you consider beautiful. That's mostly what you talk about. If so, East Texas must be the most beautiful area of the state.

In Texas, the majority of the major cities are not areas you would brag about when it comes to topography. With that being said, I don't really find Dallas as a whole to be beautiful, but there are pockets of areas that are really pretty.

BTW I guess the whole state is ugly as heck because every lake in Texas is man-made except one. So, saying "Thank God for man-made lakes otherwise it really would be horrible" doesn't only apply for North Texas, it applies for the whole State.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2013, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Houston
1,189 posts, read 1,366,969 times
Reputation: 1370
As a native Texan, I'd have to say that I don't think we have any cities that are beautiful as a whole ... but the pockets of beauty we have are valuable and should be appreciated.

As a Houstonian, I'm used to my city getting no respect (a la Rodney Daingerfield), but even we have some areas that I would call beautiful. However I admit (due to having more rainfall and warmer winters), I think we could have done better with what we had to work with.

OTOH, I think Dallas has done a much better job in working with what it has. One natural advantage you guys have is not being quite so flat-as-a-pancake everywhere like H-town. I've seen a lot of places in DFW that humans have taken advantage of -- rather than destroying -- when developing, often near small streams that provide a bit of topographic relief. I can't name many of them. Obviously Turtle Creek would be one. In the 70's I noticed that Dallas Community College was building campuses that took advantage of creeks and bits of limestone outcrop. Also, in those years, I remember driving up Greenville Avenue when there was still a lot of undeveloped farmland ... it was actually rather picturesque, so I'm curious how well it was developed to take advantage of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2013, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,506 posts, read 26,496,274 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz View Post
I'm starting to think trees is the only thing you consider beautiful. That's mostly what you talk about. If so, East Texas must be the most beautiful area of the state.

In Texas, the majority of the major cities are not areas you would brag about when it comes to topography. With that being said, I don't really find Dallas as a whole to be beautiful, but there are pockets of areas that are really pretty.

BTW I guess the whole state is ugly as heck because every lake in Texas is man-made except one. So, saying "Thank God for man-made lakes otherwise it really would be horrible" doesn't only apply for North Texas, it applies for the whole State.
There are "pockets" of beautiful neighborhoods in Dallas, most of them being in North & East Dallas.

That said, North Texas as a whole is one of the least picturesque areas of the state. Its lack of trees on 100+ degree days with all of that heat radiating off of the concrete is not a comfortable feeling.

Here in East Texas I can find a shade tree pretty much anywhere I go. Not the case in North Texas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2013, 08:34 PM
 
5,627 posts, read 7,232,386 times
Reputation: 2732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
There are "pockets" of beautiful neighborhoods in Dallas, most of them being in North & East Dallas.

That said, North Texas as a whole is one of the least picturesque areas of the state. Its lack of trees on 100+ degree days with all of that heat radiating off of the concrete is not a comfortable feeling.

Here in East Texas I can find a shade tree pretty much anywhere I go. Not the case in North Texas.
Tyler is alot smaller than Dallas. So with that being said..Im sure Dallas has just as many and most likely MORE shade trees or areas that are heavily shaded. Here you go acting as if Dallas is TOTALLY treeless...please dont start this tree mess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2013, 08:46 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,471 posts, read 9,531,180 times
Reputation: 3249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
There are "pockets" of beautiful neighborhoods in Dallas, most of them being in North & East Dallas.

That said, North Texas as a whole is one of the least picturesque areas of the state. Its lack of trees on 100+ degree days with all of that heat radiating off of the concrete is not a comfortable feeling.

Here in East Texas I can find a shade tree pretty much anywhere I go. Not the case in North Texas.
Moderator cut: Off Topic

In a city it's called the heat island effect. Because of all the concrete and buildings the temp will always be hotter than the surrounding area.

Last edited by Willsson; 07-14-2013 at 09:57 AM.. Reason: Off Topic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2013, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,422 posts, read 32,677,640 times
Reputation: 11956
Lets end the talk of trees before it starts because it will go several pages.

I think Dallas probably made a mistake not utilizing the trinity more. Many inland cities uses their river and does it well. DC is one example. Mountains are not seen for most of DC and its 3 hours from an ocean. But they didnt neglect their natural wonder staring them right in the face and as a result, they beautifued it, fixed up any problems, and DC is not seen as ugly. Dallas utilized that more, I honestly don't think we would be having this conversation.

I remember I think back in June of 2007 when Dallas started the summer with tons of rain. A picture thread was made and it showed the downtown skyline with a filled up trinity river and people noticed how massively different Dallas looked especially at night with the alpine reflecting it in the river. People wished it was like that all the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2013, 10:37 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,471 posts, read 9,531,180 times
Reputation: 3249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Lets end the talk of trees before it starts because it will go several pages.

I think Dallas probably made a mistake not utilizing the trinity more. Many inland cities uses their river and does it well. DC is one example. Mountains are not seen for most of DC and its 3 hours from an ocean. But they didnt neglect their natural wonder staring them right in the face and as a result, they beautifued it, fixed up any problems, and DC is not seen as ugly. Dallas utilized that more, I honestly don't think we would be having this conversation.

I remember I think back in June of 2007 when Dallas started the summer with tons of rain. A picture thread was made and it showed the downtown skyline with a filled up trinity river and people noticed how massively different Dallas looked especially at night with the alpine reflecting it in the river. People wished it was like that all the time.

I agree, we do need to utilize our river more but I guess they felt like it was more important to make sure our city was protected from floods. The Trinity River use to be in the place where Dealey Plaza is today. The Army Corps of Engineers created the floodplain, moved the river, and built the levees. For additional flood control, lakes were constructed to control the River. (lakes include: Lake Ray Hubbard, Lake Lewisville, Lake Grapevine, Joe Pool Lake, and more)

In the early days, (before any bridges were built) if you wanted to cross the Trinity River, you had to ride a ferry. I read when John Neely Bryan first surveyed the area, he noticed that the Trinity River was impassable but it narrowed at a point (because of the Austin Chalk) which made it possible to cross it in that particular part of the river. With that being said, I wonder how the river looked when he first surveyed the area?

BTW The Trinity River has the 3rd largest annual flow of any river in Texas (the Brazos and Sabine being larger)

Last edited by Dallaz; 07-13-2013 at 10:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2013, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,506 posts, read 26,496,274 times
Reputation: 4890
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallasboi View Post
Tyler is alot smaller than Dallas. So with that being said..Im sure Dallas has just as many and most likely MORE shade trees or areas that are heavily shaded. Here you go acting as if Dallas is TOTALLY treeless...please dont start this tree mess.
A lot smaller true, but its in an entirely different region of the state.

Dallas is prairies & lakes, Tyler is piney woods. Also, I wouldn't call an area with over 260,000 people small by any means. That's the size of some of Dallas' largest suburbs (Plano & Garland).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2013, 02:11 PM
 
5,627 posts, read 7,232,386 times
Reputation: 2732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
A lot smaller true, but its in an entirely different region of the state.

Dallas is prairies & lakes, Tyler is piney woods. Also, I wouldn't call an area with over 260,000 people small by any means. That's the size of some of Dallas' largest suburbs (Plano & Garland).
Key word: "Suburb" of Dallas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Dallas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top