Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Dallas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-11-2020, 12:44 PM
 
13,811 posts, read 27,454,017 times
Reputation: 14250

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by synchronicity View Post
Well, not quite 1 in 10 with "investable assets" over a million. I've seen a number of studies, and the closest I've seen to 1 in 10 is net worth "NIPR" (not including primary residence, basically excluding home equity). that value would include other (rental or commercial) real estate, business interests (partnership/LLC/sole proprietorship) and whatnot, as well as publicly traded securities and bank account balances and whatever. And even there, last I saw that was a shade under 10% (around 9%, I think). So including home equity it probably would be about 1 in 10, give or take.

That said, certainly a "millionaire" today is not nearly the same as a millionaire back in 1996 when the book came out (but having a million in net worth is definitely better than not having a million in net worth).

As a random tangent, there's an approximate rule of 5's - a million net worth is about upper 10%, 5 million net worth is about upper 1%, and 25 million net worth is about upper 0.1%. I think this even holds true for one level above that - that $125 million is about 0.01%, and beyond that I really don't care.
You are correct, I was just dumbing it down and writing it quickly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2020, 03:10 PM
 
Location: Dallas
989 posts, read 2,442,293 times
Reputation: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treasurevalley92 View Post
Just because DFW housing is like 14% overvalued does mean that the definition of upper middle class suddenly goes up 50%-100%

Just saying.

Upper Middle Class for a family of 4 is somewhere between 100-120K regardless of what level yall feel "Comfortable" at.

Baring medical debt, a crazy amount of student loans or something like that, if you feel stretched on that amount of money you are spending too much, simple as that.

I was looking at houses in Kings Highway that in 2012 were 200k and are now around 430k. Thats just how it goes. https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/9...26712638_zpid/

Does this mean the middle class has gone from 200k homes to 430K? Of course not. The neighborhood has cycled up.
Just to be clear, this thread isn't so much about "what is an upper middle class income" as defined by medians or percentiles or any of that, it is about what income is needed to comfortably live an upper-middle class lifestyle in DFW RIGHT NOW - if houses 7 years ago were $200k and are now $430k then by default someone wanting to purchase a home and live an "upper middle class" lifestyle in DFW is going to need more income than what was needed 7 years ago in order to cover the significantly higher monthly housing expenses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2020, 03:38 PM
 
565 posts, read 558,983 times
Reputation: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by justsomeguy View Post
Just to be clear, this thread isn't so much about "what is an upper middle class income" as defined by medians or percentiles or any of that, it is about what income is needed to comfortably live an upper-middle class lifestyle in DFW RIGHT NOW - if houses 7 years ago were $200k and are now $430k then by default someone wanting to purchase a home and live an "upper middle class" lifestyle in DFW is going to need more income than what was needed 7 years ago in order to cover the significantly higher monthly housing expenses.
Yes and No. Most people have been saying 120-150k even though 100-120k might be percentile in the range he stated for kinda that reason (prices have gone up but over-valudation is still apparant)

If you need significantly more than 120-150k then your probably trying to live in an area that "was" upper middle-class but now is majority upper class earners. If the household income of your neighbhorhood magically doubles in 7 years then that's not "the new upper-middle class", your now surrounded by upper class earners (you can't just say "uhhh 7 years passed this is the new upper-middle lifestyle").

It goes both ways. You have to add reasonable value but you can't add artifical value (too much artificial value and like i said, your probably trying to live in an area that's NOW upper-class)

Last edited by mastershake575; 01-11-2020 at 03:48 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2020, 10:32 AM
 
Location: "The Dirty Irv" Irving, TX
4,001 posts, read 3,267,122 times
Reputation: 4832
Quote:
Originally Posted by justsomeguy View Post
Just to be clear, this thread isn't so much about "what is an upper middle class income" as defined by medians or percentiles or any of that, it is about what income is needed to comfortably live an upper-middle class lifestyle in DFW RIGHT NOW - if houses 7 years ago were $200k and are now $430k then by default someone wanting to purchase a home and live an "upper middle class" lifestyle in DFW is going to need more income than what was needed 7 years ago in order to cover the significantly higher monthly housing expenses.
Yeah, just because particular neighborhoods cycled up doesn't change the definition of upper middle class lifestyle. The lifestyle isn't tied to a particular couple neighborhoods.

Neighborhoods in Oak Cliff have jumped from working class to Uppermiddle to Upperclass in the last 10 years. That doesn't mean that being working class now means you have to own a home worth half a million.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2020, 10:33 AM
 
Location: "The Dirty Irv" Irving, TX
4,001 posts, read 3,267,122 times
Reputation: 4832
Quote:
Originally Posted by mastershake575 View Post
Yes and No. Most people have been saying 120-150k even though 100-120k might be percentile in the range he stated for kinda that reason (prices have gone up but over-valudation is still apparant)

If you need significantly more than 120-150k then your probably trying to live in an area that "was" upper middle-class but now is majority upper class earners. If the household income of your neighbhorhood magically doubles in 7 years then that's not "the new upper-middle class", your now surrounded by upper class earners (you can't just say "uhhh 7 years passed this is the new upper-middle lifestyle").

It goes both ways. You have to add reasonable value but you can't add artifical value (too much artificial value and like i said, your probably trying to live in an area that's NOW upper-class)
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2020, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Dallas
989 posts, read 2,442,293 times
Reputation: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treasurevalley92 View Post
Yeah, just because particular neighborhoods cycled up doesn't change the definition of upper middle class lifestyle. The lifestyle isn't tied to a particular couple neighborhoods.

Neighborhoods in Oak Cliff have jumped from working class to Uppermiddle to Upperclass in the last 10 years. That doesn't mean that being working class now means you have to own a home worth half a million.....

The lifestyle is tied to YOUR ANNUAL EXPENSES which are significantly higher when a home cost $400k that used to cost $200k.

I don't understand why people keep bringing up the past, the past has nothing to do with the basic question of "How much income do you need right now to life a comfortable upper-middle class lifestyle in DFW?" It is about existing costs RIGHT NOW.

You wouldn't say an upper-middle class income is $120k in San Francisco because a home in San Francisco costs over $1M, your annual expenses are way higher if you have to buy a $1M home, thus $120k income is not going to cut the mustard in an area where homes costs over $1M. It is the same principle here, if homes now cost $400k then you need more income to cover that expense and still have all the other luxuries associated with upper-middle class living.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2020, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Dallas
989 posts, read 2,442,293 times
Reputation: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by mastershake575 View Post
Yes and No. Most people have been saying 120-150k even though 100-120k might be percentile in the range he stated for kinda that reason (prices have gone up but over-valudation is still apparant)

If you need significantly more than 120-150k then your probably trying to live in an area that "was" upper middle-class but now is majority upper class earners. If the household income of your neighbhorhood magically doubles in 7 years then that's not "the new upper-middle class", your now surrounded by upper class earners (you can't just say "uhhh 7 years passed this is the new upper-middle lifestyle").

It goes both ways. You have to add reasonable value but you can't add artifical value (too much artificial value and like i said, your probably trying to live in an area that's NOW upper-class)

The question has absolutely nothing to do with the income or class characteristics of certain neighborhoods, it is a very simple question, HOW MUCH INCOME IS NEEDED TO COVER YOUR ANNUAL EXPENSES AT CURRENT HOUSE PRICES + LIVE COMFORTABLY + INCREASE SAVINGS aka live an upper-middle class lifestyle; the descriptor of upper-middle class is just a generic way of classifying the parameters given in the original question (own a home, take vacations, etc. etc.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2020, 12:53 PM
 
565 posts, read 558,983 times
Reputation: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by justsomeguy View Post
The question has absolutely nothing to do with the income or class characteristics of certain neighborhoods
Given the context of the post (comfterable lifestyle within a 1 hour commute of Dallas), yes neighborhoods characteristics and income is gonna be gigantic factors.

Quote:
Originally Posted by justsomeguy View Post
it is a very simple question
No it's a very difficult question with many factors that can literally have 3 different answers in just a 2 mile span........ (if it was a simple question you would of done basic googling on home prices/bills and gotten your answer, you didn't wonder why )

If your idea of the answer you wanted was "simple" then you would of found the answer yourself in less than a day. Instead all you did was argue with people who live in these area's because it doesn't fit your narrative (if the narrative is already in your head and you already know everything then you should probably stop acting like your trying to get help and just move on)
Quote:
Originally Posted by justsomeguy View Post
live an upper-middle class lifestyle; the descriptor of upper-middle class is just a generic way of classifying the parameters given in the original question (own a home, take vacations, etc. etc.)
That's not how it works in DFW. That's not only too vague of a question but it's area specific (120k could fit everything you said in East Richarson but wouldn't even get you an apartment in other areas).

For most area's either around Dallas or North of it 120k-150k is gonna be the budget your looking for. If you need significantly more than that to get into a specific area then your leaning more towards an upper class budget/area (really nothing else needs to be said from this point on).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2020, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Dallas
989 posts, read 2,442,293 times
Reputation: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by mastershake575 View Post
Given the context of the post (comfterable lifestyle within a 1 hour commute of Dallas), yes neighborhoods characteristics and income is gonna be gigantic factors.
But that only matters in the context of RIGHT NOW, not 7 years ago or historically.

The historical income or class or rise and fall of any particular neighborhood is irrelevant for answering the question at hand (the one exception is if you are using the historical trend to forecast into the future: e.g. is this neighborhood declining.

The only thing that matters is: Current house price in neighborhoods with nice homes and good schools, and how much money is left over after paying the PITI mortgage on that house, and is it enough money left over to live what one might call "upper-middle class" (i.e. strong positive monthly cash flow, strong retirement savings, vacations, kids activities, etc.).

This thread isn't an argument about "what defines an upper-middle class income/neighborhood", at least not in my mind, it's basically a simple math equation as far as I am concerned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2020, 01:32 PM
 
565 posts, read 558,983 times
Reputation: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by justsomeguy View Post

The only thing that matters is: Current house price in neighborhoods with nice homes and good schools, and how much money is left over after paying the PITI mortgage on that house, and is it enough money left over to live what one might call "upper-middle class" (i.e. strong positive monthly cash flow, strong retirement savings, vacations, kids activities, etc.).
This question has literally be answered by 6 different users (most of which live in the area's with good schools ) and your still not happy with the answers they gave

Nice homes with good extra circular activities/cash flow in popular top 5% feeder highschools (Allen, Boyd, Wylie High, Coppell, Pearce, Plano Senior, Richardson) 120-150k is what your looking for
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Dallas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top