Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Denver
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-06-2012, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
7,138 posts, read 11,032,050 times
Reputation: 7808

Advertisements

I found this on the RTD website, showing the proposed bus routes after the Gold Line and W Line opens. I know some people here have posted wondering what the service to Golden will be like after the west light rail line opens. It doesn't look good. Seems that RTD is planning to cut virtually all local and express bus service west of Wadsworth Blvd. except for a couple of main routes. See the discontinued routes in black on the below map.

This looks to me to be the single biggest cut in bus service ever for RTD. IMHO, it going to be a FAIL. Most of the new rail stations on the W Line will have no feeder bus service what so ever. I believe this is pretty much unprecedented for a rail system anywhere. Every rail system I know of depend on feeder bus routes to get people to the station. RTD seems to actually be encouraging people to drive, by providing no feeder bus service.

By discontinuing Route 17 service to the Jeffco Government Center, RTD is eliminating the only bus route that people could possibly use to get from there to Downtown Golden. Without having to go all the way to the Federal Center and transfer. This will leave Golden residents with no direct bus service to the Jeffco Government Center.

I think I've found an even bigger FAIL though. RTD plans to continue to run limited bus routes 30L and 36L from Federal Blvd. to Downtown to provide a connection for light rail riders who want to continue into the Central Business District. What the hell? They actually expect people to get off the light rail and transfer to buses at Federal Blvd. just to continue Downtown.

Thats the single biggest design flaw in the west line IMHO. I can't think of any good reason why that they couldn't have half the trains on the west line run Downtown to California St. The same way they do an the southeast and southwest lines. I guess they need to prop up their Union Station redevelopment some how.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-06-2012, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Berkeley Neighborhood, Denver, CO USA
17,710 posts, read 29,829,274 times
Reputation: 33301
No surprise.
RTD is trying to "drive" people to the train so they can say: "See, people are riding the rails. It was worth the bazillion $".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2012, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
7,138 posts, read 11,032,050 times
Reputation: 7808
Quote:
Originally Posted by davebarnes View Post
No surprise.
RTD is trying to "drive" people to the train so they can say: "See, people are riding the rails. It was worth the bazillion $".
Yes, but are they really driving people to the trains, by forcing them to drive their cars? Aren't a certain number of people just going to say to hell with it, and just drive Downtown? Especially when the light rail doesn't even get them near the center of Downtown, without having to transfer to an additional bus just to complete the trip? And what about people who don't own cars, and can't get to the light rail because RTD cut their bus route?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2012, 04:05 PM
 
977 posts, read 1,328,629 times
Reputation: 1211
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaaBoom View Post
Thats the single biggest design flaw in the west line IMHO. I can't think of any good reason why that they couldn't have half the trains on the west line run Downtown to California St. The same way they do an the southeast and southwest lines. I guess they need to prop up their Union Station redevelopment some how.
The DT loop is at capacity and can't support additional trains. This is the sole reason that the West Line was built w/o the connector. To add additional capacity to the DT loop you have to put the rail lines on a separate grade either above or below the streets. Or you have to add another rail transit access line into DT from the south such as the old proposal for the Broadway connector, though that line would still likely involve going above or below grade through DT. Another possibility would be to eliminate the F line, increase the frequency of E, and also have the H go to Union Station, to provide the slots for trains from the West Corridor. Though this wouldn't support the train frequencies anticipated in 2030.

As for the bus lines, RTD will likely bring back the routes that elicit the most opposition. For the lines that serve marginal ridership in areas with declining populations or stagnating ones.... sucks to be you.

Last edited by wong21fr; 04-06-2012 at 04:21 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2012, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
7,138 posts, read 11,032,050 times
Reputation: 7808
Quote:
Originally Posted by wong21fr View Post
The DT loop is at capacity and can't support additional trains. This is the sole reason that the West Line was built w/o the connector. To add additional capacity to the DT loop you have to put the rail lines on a separate grade either above or below the streets. Or you have to add another rail transit access line into DT from the south such as the old proposal for the Broadway connector, though that line would still likely involve going above or below grade through DT. Another possibility would be to eliminate the F line, increase the frequency of E, and also have the H go to Union Station, to provide the slots for trains from the West Corridor. Though this wouldn't support the train frequencies anticipated in 2030.
Interesting. I'm sure thats RTDs story, but I don't buy it. The D, F, and H lines each run every 15 min. in rush hour. Thats a combined service of every 5 min. Last year, in order to accommodate four car trains the city retimed the the traffic lights downtown, from 1 min. 15 sec. to 1 min. 30 sec. cycles. That means that theoretically they should be able to push four car trains through the Downtown loop one train every minute and a half (same headway as the Mall Shuttles busses), or over 3x as many trains as now use the tracks. But nobody would expect them to do that. They would only need to run the trains at 3 min. intervals in order to accommodate the W Line trains. That would mean one train every second green light instead of every third green light. Which shouldn't be a big deal.

Which means that RTD is hold back on the capacity of the tracks, or they are just too lazy or incompetent to utilize the tracks to the full potential.

If they just can't handle that, then rerouting the H Line to Union Station would be the next best option. Since all the station except for two on the H Line already have duplicated service with the F line to Downtown. Whereas non of the stations on the W Line will have any direct service to Downtown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2012, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Berkeley Neighborhood, Denver, CO USA
17,710 posts, read 29,829,274 times
Reputation: 33301
Default @ KaaBoom

You are going about this all wrong.

1. You assume that RTD thought this through. They did not.

2. RTD woke up one morning and said: "we have spent a lot of money on the trains and we need to get people to use them".
"Oh, I know. We will drop bus service 'near' the trains and everyone will then use the trains.

3. RTD has no clue what they are doing other than:
a. How to spend money.
b. "Trains good, buses bad."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2012, 04:35 PM
 
556 posts, read 1,200,301 times
Reputation: 561
it is obvious that the focus of fasttracks has always been to encourage park-n-ride use and to raise property values for developers. they have shown no inclination to serve existing neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Denver
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top